Guest editor's note

Journal of Environment and Development

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 7-26

  Leifman, Michael ^a   Heil, Mark ^a  

^a U S ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 14844311923     PISSN: 10704965     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1070496504274037     Document Type: Editorial

References (31)

1. Aldy, J. E. (2005). An environmental Kuznets curve analysis of U.S. state-level carbon dioxide emissions. Journal of Environment & Development, 14(1), 48-72.
2. Canes, M. (2003). Unraveling the puzzle: Differing economic estimates of climate policy. Retrieved December 2, 2004, from www.marshall.org/ pdf/materials/192.pdf
3. Dasgupta, S., Laplante, B., Wang, H., & Wheeler, D. (2002). Confronting the environmental Kuznets curve. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16, (1), 147-168.
4. DeCanio, S. J. (2003). Economics models of climate change. A critique New York: Pargrave MacMillan.
5. 2: Heterogeneity versus homogeneity. Retrieved November 4, 2004, from www.wif.ethz.ch/ sured/programme/sured_dijkgraaf_meelenberg_vollebergh.pdf
6. Edmonds, J. A., & Moreira, J. (2003). Cross cutting theme: Technology in AR4. Retrieved November 2, 2004, from www.ipcc.ch/ activity/cct7.pdf
7. Fischer, C., & Morgenstern, R. (2003). Carbon abatement costs: Why the wide range of estimates? (Discussion Paper 03-42). Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
8. Goulder, L. H. (2004). Induced technological change and climate policy. Retrieved November 2, 2004, from www.pewclimate.org/ docUploads/ITC%5FReport%5FF2%2Epdf
9. Grossman G., & Krueger, A. (1995). Economic growth and the environment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(2), 353-377.
10. Heil, M. T., & Selden, T. M. (2001). Carbon emissions and economic development: Future trajectories based on historical experience. Environment and Development Economics, 6, 63-83.
11. Huntington, H. I., & Weyant, J. P. (2002). Modeling energy markets and climate change policy. Retrieved December 2, 2004, from www.stanford.edu/group/EMF/publications/doc/op52.pdf
12. 2 emissions from fuel combustion 1971/2001-2003 edition. Energy, 2003(18), 1-557.
13. Laitner, J. A., DeCanio, S. J., & Peters, I. (2000). Incorporating behavioral, social, and organizational phenomena in the assessment of climate change mitigation options. In E. Jochem, J. Sathaye, & D. Bouille (Eds.), Society, behavior, and climate change mitigation (pp. 1-64). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
14. List, J. A., & Gallet, C. (1999). The environmental Kuznets curve: Does one size fit all? Ecological Economics, 31, 409-423.
15. López, R., & Galinato, G. I. (2005). Deforestation and forest-induced carbon dioxide emissions in tropical countries: How do governance and trade openness affect the forest-income relationship? Journal of Environment & Development, 14(1), 73-100.
16. 2 emission trends in developing countries differ from historic trends in the United States. Journal of Environment & Development, 14(1), 125-148.
17. 2 emissions. Environment and Development Economics, 2, 451-463.
18. Munasinghe, M. (1999). Is environmental degradation an inevitable consequence of economic growth: Tunneling through the environmental Kuznets curve. Ecological Economics, 29, 89-109.
19. Nakicenovic, N., & Swart, R. (Eds.). (2000). Special report on emissions scenarios. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
20. Panayotou, T. (1993). Empirical tests and policy analysis of environmental degradation at different stages of economic development (Working Paper WP238 Technology & Employment Programme). Geneva, Switzerland: International Labor Office.
21. Panayotou, T. (1997). Demystifying the environmental Kuznets curve: Turning a black box into a policy tool. Environment and Development Economics, 2, 465-484.
22. Parson, E. A., & Fisher-Vanden, F. (1995). In search of integrated assessment. Retrieved December 2, 2004, from http://sedac.ciesin.org/ mva/iamcc.tg/insearchof.html
23. Pepper, W., Sankovski, A., & Leggett, J. (2005). Probabilistic modeling of sulfur and nitrogen pollution controls and their relations with income. Journal of Environment & Development, 14(1), 197-219.
24. Perman, R., & Stern, D. I. (2003). Evidence from panel unit root and cointegration tests that the environmental Kuznets curve does not exist. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 47, 325-347.
25. Selden, T. M., & Song, D. (1994). Environmental quality and development: Is there a Kuznets curve for air pollutant emissions? Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 27, 147-162.
26. Selden, T. M., Forrest, A. S., & Lockhart, J. E. (1999). Analyzing reductions in U.S. air pollution emissions: 1970 to 1990. Land Economics, 75, 1-21.
27. Shafik, N., & Bandyopadhyay, S. (1992). Economic growth and environmental quality: Time series and cross-section evidence (World Bank Policy Research Working Paper #WPS904). Washington, DC: World Bank.
28. bjECTS MiniCAM model. Journal of Environment & Development, 14(1), 175-196.
29. Stern, D. I. (2003). The environmental Kuznets curve. Retrieved November 4, 2004, from www.ecoeco.org/publica/encyc_entries/Stern.pdf
30. Stern, D. I. (2004). The rise and fall of the environmental Kuznets curve. World Development, 32(8), 1419-1439.
31. Stern, D. I. (2005). Beyond the environmental Kuznets curve: Diffusion of sulfur-emissions-abating technology. Journal of Environment & Development, 14(1), 101-124.