Determination of constraint limits for cleavage initiated toughness data

Engineering Fracture Mechanics

Volumn 72, Issue 10, 2005, Pages 1559-1579

  Joyce, J A ^a   Tregoning, R L ^b  

^a UNITED STATES NAVAL ACADEMY   (United States)

^b U S NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BRITTLENESS; CONSTRAINT THEORY; DATA REDUCTION; DEFORMATION; DUCTILITY; FRACTURE; MONTE CARLO METHODS; THERMAL EFFECTS;

CLEAVAGE INITIATED TOUGHNESS; CONSTRAINT LIMITS; INDEXING TEMPERATURE; TOUGHNESS ENHANCEMENT;

TOUGHNESS;

CLEAVAGE;

EID: 14844307116     PISSN: 00137944     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2004.11.001     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. T. Anderson R.H. Dodds Jr Specimen size requirements for fracture toughness testing in the ductile-to-brittle transition regime J Test Eval 19 1991 123-134
2. c testing of bend specimens. In: Kirk M, Ad Bakker, editors. Constraint effects in fracture theory and applications: Second volume. ASTM STP 1244, 1995
3. M. Nevalainen R.H. Dodds Jr Numerical investigation of 3-D constraint effects on brittle fracture in SE(B) and C(T) specimens Int J Fract 74 1995 131-161
4. 0, for ferritic steels in the transition regime. Annual Book of ASTM Standards, vol. 3.01. West Conshohocken, PA, 2002
5. E1820-99a. Standard test method for measurement of fracture toughness. Annual Book of ASTM Standards, vol. 3.01. West Conshohocken, PA, 2001
6. Wallin K. Statistical Aspects of constraint with emphasis on testing and analysis of laboratory specimens in the transition region. In: Hackett EM et al., editors. Constraint effects in fracture. ASTM STP 1171, 1993
7. Nevalainen M, Wallin K, Rintamaa R. Crack depth effects measured by dynamic fracture toughness tests. In: Landes JD, McCabe DE, Boulet JAM, editors. Fracture mechanics: Twenty-fourth symposium. ASTM STP 1207, 1995
8. Theiss TJ, Bryson JW. Influence of crack depth on the fracture toughness of reactor pressure vessel steel. In: Hackett EM et al., editors. Constraint effects in fracture. ASTM STP 1171, 1993
9. 0, for ferritic steels in the transition range. NUREG/CR-5504, US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 1998
10. X. Gao R.H. Dodds Jr Constraint effects on the ductile-to-brittle transition temperature of ferritic steels: A Weibull stress model Int J Fract 102 2000 43-69
11. C. Ruggieri R.H. Dodds Jr A transferability model for brittle fracture including constraint and ductile tearing effects: A probabilistic approach Int J Fract 79 1996 309-340
12. 0, for ferritic steels in the transition regime Engng Fract Mech 60 1 1998 19-36
13. 0 reference temperature. ECF13, San Sebastian, Spain, 2000
14. A.P. Kfouri Some evaluations of the elastic T-term using Eshelby's method Int J Fract 30 1986 301-315
15. T.-L. Sham The determination of the elastic T-term using higher order weight functions Int J Fract 48 1991 81-102
16. A.H. Sherry C.C. France M.R. Goldthorpe Compendium of T-stress solutions for two and three dimensional cracked geometries Fatigue Fract Engng Mater Struct 18 1 1995 141-155
17. X. Gao R.H. Dodds An engineering approach to access constraint effects on cleavage fracture toughness Engng Fract Mech 68 2001 263-284
18. 0 shift between specimens of different constraints using the T-stress based F-functions Int J Fract 104 2000 L3-L8
19. Tregoning RL, Joyce JA. Application of a T-stress based constraint correction to A533B steel fracture toughness data. In: Piascik RS, Reuter WG, editors. Fatigue and fracture mechanics: Vol. 33. ASTM STP1417, 2002. p. 307-27
20. Zhang XJ, Tregoning RL. The effect of localized carbide banding on the fracture toughness of heavy section A533B steel. Materials Solution, ASM, 1999. p. 75-83
21. 0 evaluation in common specimen geometries. In: The 2000 ASME pressure vessel and piping conference, Seattle, PVP, vol. 412, 2000. p. 133-42
22. 0. ECF13, San Sebastian, Spain, 2000
23. Rathbun HJ. On the size scaling of cleavage toughness in the transition: a single variable experiment and model based analysis. NUREG/CR-6790, US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC, to be published
24. Wallin K. Validity of small specimen fracture toughness estimates neglecting constraint corrections. In: Kirk M, Ad Bakker, editors. Constraint effects in fracture theory and applications: Second volume. ASTM STP 1244, 1995
25. J. Heerens D. Hellmann Development of the euro fracture toughness dataset Engng Fract Mech 69 4 2002 421-450
26. K. Wallin Quantitative experimental method for studying brittle fracture constraint loss in C(T) and 3PB specimens In: J. Pan editor. Fracture, fatigue, and residual stress - PVP, vol. 393 1999 American Society of Mechanical Engineers
27. Ingham T, Knee N, Milne I, Morland E. Fracture toughness in the transition for A533B steel: Prediction of large specimen results from small specimen tests. In: Wei RP, Gangloff RP, editors. ASTM STP 1020, 1989. p. 369-89
28. Morland E. Fracture toughness in the transition regime for A533B-1 steel: The effect of specimen sidegrooving. In: Gudas JP, Joyce JA, editors. ASTM STP 1074, 1990. p. 215-37
29. D. Lidbury R. Moskovic Assessment of the ductile-to-brittle transition toughness behavior of an A508 class 3 PWR pressure vessel steel by a statistical approach Pressure vessel integrity, PVP vol. 250 1993 The American Society of Mechanical Engineers 283-294
30. Gibson GP, Capel M. A note on the tensile and cleavage fracture stress properties for a modern Creusot-Loire A508 Class 3 Forging. PWR/RDMC/MWG/ p(87) 125M, Harwell, 1987
31. Petti J, Dodds RH. Constraint differences between C(T) and SE(B) specimens: 3-D analyses. Presented at the ASTM Committee Week, Kansas City, MO, May 2003
32. Kirk MT, Dodds Jr RH. J and CTOD estimation equations for shallow cracks in single edge notch bend specimens. NUREG/CR-5969, US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC, July 1993
33. R. Moskovic Modeling of fracture toughness data in the ductile to brittle transition region by statistical analysis Engng Fract Mech 69 2002 511-530