Assessment of aerial photography as a method for monitoring aquatic vegetation in lakes of varying trophic status

Boreal Environment Research

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 57-66

  Valta Hulkkonen, Kirsi ^a   Kanninen, Antti ^b   Ilvonen, Riitta ^a   Leka, Jarkko ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OULU   (Finland)

^b Finland's Environmental Administration   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 14844304371     PISSN: 12396095     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Ackleson S.G. & Klemas V. 1987. Remote sensing of submerged aquatic vegetation in Lower Chesapeake Bay: a comparison of Landsat MSS to TM imagery. Remote Sens. Environ. 22: 235-248.
2. Ahmad S.P. & Deering D.W. 1992. The role of specular reflectance in surface anisotropy. In: Proceedings in geoscience and remote sensing symposium IGARSS'92, 26-29 May, Houston, Texas, pp. 514-516.
3. Council of the European Communities 2000. Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy. Official Journal of the European Communities L327.
4. Duarte C.M. & Kalff J. 1986. Patterns in the submerged macrophyte biomass of lakes and the importance of the scale of analysis in the interpretation. Can. J. Aquat. Sci. 47: 357-363.
5. Hellsten S. 2000. Environmental factors and aquatic macrophytes in the littoral zone of regulated lakes. Acta Universitas Ouluensis A 348.
6. Ilmavirta V. & Toivonen H. 1986. Comparative studies on macrophytes and phytoplankton in ten small, brown-water lakes of different trophic status. Aqua Fennica 16: 125-142.
7. Jensen J.R., Narumalani S., Weatherbee O. & Halkard E.M.Jr. 1993. Measurement of seasonal and yearly Cattail and Waterlily changes using multidate SPOT panchromatic data. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 59: 519-525.
8. Lehmann A., Jaquet J.-M. & Lachavanne J.B. 1997. A GIS approach of aquatic plant spatial heterogeneity in relation to sediment and depth gradients, Lake Geneva, Switzerland. Aquat. Bot. 58: 347-361.
9. Leka J., Valta-Hulkkonen K., Kanninen A., Partanen S., Hellsten S., Ustinov A., Ilvonen R. & Airaksinen O. 2003. Vesimakrofyytit järvien ekologisen tilan arvioinnissa ja seurannassa. Alueelliset ympäristö julkaisut 312.
10. Liliesand T.M. & Kiefer R.W. 2000. Remote sensing and image interpretation. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., USA.
11. Littlejohn C., Nixon S., Cassazza G., Fabiani C., Premazzi G., Heinonen P., Ferguson A. & Pollard P. 2002. Guidance on Monitoring for the Water Framework Directive. Water Framework Directive (WFD) Common Implementation Strategy Working Group 2.7., Monitoring.
12. Malthus T.J. & George D.G. 1997. Airborne remote sensing of macrophytes in Cefri Reservoir, Anglesey, UK. Aquat. Bot 58: 317-332.
13. Marshall T.R. & Lee P.F. 1994. Mapping aquatic macrophytes through digital image analysis of aerial photographs: an assessment. J. Aquat. Plant. Manage. 32: 61-66.
14. Narumalani S., Jensen J.R., Althausen J.D., Burkhalter S. & Halkard E.M.Jr. 1997. Aquatic macrophyte modeling using GIS and logistic multiple regression. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 63: 41-49.
15. Pellikka P. 1998. Development of correction chain for multi-spectral airborne video camera data for natural resource assessment. Fennia 176: 1-110.
16. Penuelas J., Gamon J.A., Griffin K.L. & Field C.B. 1993. Assessing community type, plant biomass, pigment composition, and photosynthetic efficiency of aquatic vegetation from spectral reflectance. Remote Sens. Environ. 46: 110-118.
17. Pilke A., Heinonen P., Karttunen K., Koskenniemi E., Lepistö L., Pietiläinen O.-P., Rissanen J. & Vuoristo H. 2002. Finnish draft for typology of lakes and rivers. TemaNord 2002(566): 42-43. Helsinki, Nordic Council of Ministers.
18. Riis T. & Hawes I. 2003. Effect of wave exposure on vegetation abundance, richness and depth distribution of shallow water plants in a New Zealand lake. Freshwater Biology 48: 75-87.
19. Rørslett B. 1991. Principal determinants of aquatic macrophyte richness in northern European lakes. Aquat. Bot. 39: 173-193.
20. Seddon B. 1972. Aquatic macrophytes as limnological indicators. Freshwater Biology 2: 107-130.
21. Smith V.H. & Wallsten M. 1986. Prediction of emergent and floating-leaved macrophyte cover in central Swedish lakes. Can. J. Aquat. Sci. 43: 2519-2523.
22. Spence D.H.N. 1967. Factors controlling the distribution of freshwater macrophytes with particular reference to the lochs of Scotland. J. Ecol. 55: 147-170.
23. Toivonen H. 2000. Botanical aspects in lake monitoring and assessment. In: Heinonen P., Ziglio G. & van der Beken A. (eds.), Hydrological and limnological aspects of lake monitoring. John Wiley & Sons, pp. 119-130.
24. Toivonen H. & Back S. 1989. Changes in aquatic vegetation of a small eutrophicated and lowered lake (Southern Finland). Ann. Bot. Fennici 26: 27-38.
25. Toivonen H. & Nybom C. 1989. Aquatic vegetation and its recent succession in the waterfowl wetland Koijärvi, S. Finland. Ann. Bot. Fennici 26: 1-14.
26. Toivonen H. & Huttunen P. 1995. Aquatic macrophytes and ecological gradients in 57 small lakes in southern Finland. Aquat. Bot. 51: 197-221.
27. US EPA 1998. Lake and reservoir bioassessment and biocriteria: technical guidance document (1998) - US Environmental Protection Agency. EPA 822-B00-98-001.
28. Valta-Hulkkonen K., Partanen S. & Kanninen A. 2003a. Remote sensing as a tool in aquatic macrophyte mapping of a eutrophic lake: a comparison between visual and digital classification. Proceedings of the 9th Scandinavian Research Conference on Geographical Information Science, 4.-6.6.2003, Espoo, Finland, pp. 79-90.
29. Valta-Hulkkonen K., Pellikka P., Tanskanen H., Ustinov A. & Sandman O. 2003b. Digital false colour aerial photographs for discrimination of aquatic macrophyte species. Aquat. Bot. 75: 71-88.
30. Valta-Hulkkonen K., Kanninen A. & Pellikka P. 2004a. Remote sensing and GIS for detecting changes in the aquatic vegetation of a rehabilitated lake. Int. J. Remote Sens. 25. [In print].
31. Valta-Hulkkonen K., Pellikka P. & Peltoniemi J. 2004b. Assessment of bi-directional reflectance over aquatic macrophyte vegetation in CIR aerial photographs. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 70: 581-587.
32. Wallin M., Wiederholm T. & Johnson R.K. 2003. Guidance on establishing reference conditions and ecological status class boundaries for inland surface waters. REFCOND Guidance. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
33. Welch R., Remillard M.M. & Slack R.B. 1988. Remote sensing and geographic information system techniques for aquatic resource evaluation. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 54: 177-185.
34. Zhang X. 1998. On the estimation of biomass of submerged vegetation using Landsat thematic mapper (TM) imagery: a case study of the Honghu Lake, PR China. Int. J. Remote Sens. 19: 11-20.