|
|
|
Volumn 32, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 317-340
|
|
Seeking an answer: questioning the validity of forcible medication to ensure mental competency of those condemned to die.
|
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
|
Indexed keywords
NEUROLEPTIC AGENT;
ARTICLE;
CIVIL RIGHTS;
DEATH AND EUTHANASIA;
EIGHTH AMENDMENT;
FORD V. WAINWRIGHT;
FORENSIC PSYCHIATRY;
FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT;
GOVERNMENT;
HUMAN;
JURISPRUDENCE;
LEGAL APPROACH;
LEGAL ASPECT;
MENTAL CAPACITY;
MENTAL HEALTH THERAPIES;
MENTAL PATIENT;
PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATION;
PRISONER;
PSYCHOSIS;
PUNISHMENT;
TREATMENT REFUSAL;
UNITED STATES;
WASHINGTON V. HARPER;
DEATH AND EUTHANASIA;
EIGHTH AMENDMENT;
FORD V. WAINWRIGHT;
FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT;
LEGAL APPROACH;
MENTAL HEALTH THERAPIES;
WASHINGTON V. HARPER;
ANTIPSYCHOTIC AGENTS;
ARKANSAS;
CAPITAL PUNISHMENT;
CIVIL RIGHTS;
COERCION;
HUMANS;
INSANITY DEFENSE;
LOUISIANA;
MENTAL COMPETENCY;
MENTALLY ILL PERSONS;
PRISONERS;
PSYCHOTIC DISORDERS;
STATE GOVERNMENT;
SUPREME COURT DECISIONS;
TREATMENT REFUSAL;
UNITED STATES;
|
|
EID: 14844299411
PISSN: 15209245
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: None Document Type: Article |
|
Times cited : (2)
|
|
References (0)
|
