Comparison of two approaches for identifying job preferences among persons with disabilities using video CD-ROM

Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities

Volumn 37, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 300-309

  Ellerd, David A ^a   Morgan, Robert L ^a   Salzberg, Charles L ^a  

^a UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 14844292399     PISSN: 10793917     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Agran, M., Blanchard, C., & Wehmeyer, M. L. (2000). Promoting transition goals and self-determination through student self-directed learning: The self-determined learning model of instruction. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 35, 351-364.
2. Apple Computer, Inc. (2000). QuickTime 4.1.2 [on-line]. Available: http://www.apple.com/quick-time/download/
3. Barlow, D. H., & Hersen, M. (1973). Single case experimental designs: Uses in applied clinical research. Archives of General Psychiatry, 29, 319-325.
4. Field, S., Martin, J., Miller, R., Ward, M., & Wehmeyer, M., (1998). A practical guide for teaching self-determination. Reston, VA: Division on Career Development and Transition, Council for Exceptional Children.
5. Fisher, W. W., Piazza, C. C., Bowman, L. G., Hagopian, L. H., Owens, J. C., & Slevin, I. (1992). A comparison of two approaches for identifying reinforcers for persons with severe and profound disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 491-498.
6. Hughes, C., Pitkin, S. E., & Lorden, S. W. (1998). Assessing preferences and choices of persons with severe and profound mental retardation. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 33, 299-316.
7. The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Amendments of 1997 (IDEA), Public Law 105-17. Retrieved August 3, 2001, from http:/www.ed.gov/offices/OSERS/IDEA.
8. Mithaug, D. E., & Hanawalt, D. A. (1978). The validation of procedures to assess prevocational task preferences in retarded adults. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 153 162.
9. Pace, G. M., Ivancic, M. T., Edwards, G. L., Iwata, B. A., & Page, T.J. (1985). Assessment of stimulus preference and reinforcer value with profoundly retarded individuals. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 18, 249-255.
10. Piazza, C. C., Fisher, W. W., Hagopian, L. H., Bowman, L. B., & Toole, L. (1996). Using a choice assessment to predict reinforcer effectiveness. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29, 1-9.
11. Reid, D. H., Parsons, M. B., & Green, C. W. (1998). Identifying work preferences among individuals with severe multiple disabilities prior to beginning supported work. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 31, 218-285.
12. US Department of Labor (1991). Dictionary of occupational titles (4th Ed.). Indianapolis, IN: JIST.