The influence of various conditioner agents on the interdiffusion zone and microleakage of a glass ionomer cement with a high viscosity in primary teeth

Operative Dentistry

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 105-112

  Yilmaz, Y ^a,b   Gurbuz, T ^a   Kocogullari, M E ^a  

^a ATATÜRK UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b Dis Hekimligi Fakultesi   (Turkey)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GLASS IONOMER; HYDROGEN PEROXIDE; MALEIC ACID; PHOSPHORIC ACID; TOOTH CEMENT;

ARTICLE; DENTAL DEBONDING; DENTIN; DISSOLUTION; ENAMEL; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; STEREOMICROSCOPY; TOOTH EXTRACTION; TOOTH FILLING;

ACID ETCHING, DENTAL; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; DENTAL ENAMEL PERMEABILITY; DENTAL LEAKAGE; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTIN PERMEABILITY; DRUG COMBINATIONS; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HUMANS; HYDROGEN PEROXIDE; MALEATES; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; MOLAR; PHOSPHORIC ACIDS; RANDOM ALLOCATION; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TOOTH, DECIDUOUS; VISCOSITY;

EID: 14844288459     PISSN: 03617734     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Aboush YE & Jenkins CB (1987) The effect of poly(acrylic acid) cleanser on the adhesion of a glass polyalkenoate cement to enamel and dentine Journal of Dentistry 15(4) 141-152.
2. Ben-Amar A, Liberman R, Apatowsky U & Pilo R (1999) pH changes of glass-ionomer lining materials at various time intervals Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 26(11) 847-852.
3. Blunck U (2000) Adhesives: Principles and State of the Art in Adhesion: The Silent Revolution edited by Jean-François R & Michel DA Chicago, Quintessence Publishing Co p 29-44.
4. Bourke AM, Walls AW & McCabe JF (1994) Bond strength to dentine of two light-activated glass polyalkenoate (ionomer) cements Journal of Dentistry 22(4) 242-246.
5. Castro A & Feigal RE (2002) Microleakage of a new improved glass ionomer restorative material in primary and permanent teeth Pediatric Dentistry 24(1) 23-28.
6. Charlton DG & Haveman CW (1994) Dentin surface treatment and bond strength of glass ionomers American Journal of Dentistry 7(1) 47-49.
7. Douglas WH (1989) Clinical status of dentine bonding agents Journal of Dentistry 17(5) 209-215.
8. Ferrari M & Davidson CL (1997) Interdiffusion of a traditional glass ionomer cement into conditioned dentin American Journal of Dentistry 10(6) 295-297.
9. Glasspoole EA, Erickson RL & Davidson CL (2002) Effect of surface treatment on the bond strength of glass ionomers to enamel Dental Materials 18(6) 454-462.
10. Goes MF, Sinhoreti MA, Consani S & Silva MAP (1998) Morphological effect of the type, concentration and etching time of acid solutions on enamel and dentin surfaces Brazilian Dental Journal 9(1) 3-10.
11. Gwinnett AJ (1984) Smear layer: Morphological considerations Operative Dentistry 3(Supplement 3) 2-12.
12. Hewlett ER, Caputo AA & Wrobel DC (1991) Glass ionomer bond strength and treatment of dentin with polyacrylic acid Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 66(6) 767-772.
13. Hinoura K, Moore BK & Phillips RW (1986) Influence of dentin surface treatments on the bond strengths of dentin lining cements Operative Dentistry 11(4) 147-154.
14. Hotz P, McLean JW, Sced I & Wilson AD (1977) The bonding of glass-ionomer cements to metal and tooth substrates British Dental Journal 142(2) 41-47.
15. Joynt RB, Davis EL, Wieczkowski G Jr & Pierce L (1990) Effect of dentinal pretreatment on bond strength between glass ionomer cement and dentin Operative Dentistry 15(5) 173-177.
16. Lacefield WR, Reindl MC & Retief DH (1985) Tensile bond strength of a glass-ionomer cement Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 53(2) 194-198.
17. Matos AB, Palma RG, Saraceni CH & Matson E (1997) Effects of acid etching on dentin surface: SEM morphological study Brazilian Dental Journal 8(1) 35-41.
18. Nakabayashi N & Pashley DH (1998) Evolution of dentin-resin bonding in Hybridization of Dental Hard Tissues Tokyo, Quintessence Publishing Co p 1-4, 17-20.
19. Ngo H, Mount GJ & Peters MC (1997) A study of glass-ionomer cement and its interface with enamel and dentin using a low-temperature, high-resolution scanning electron microscopic technique Quintessence International 28(1) 63-69.
20. Nitta Y (1992) Effect of surface treatment on microleakage and tensile bond strength of glass polyalkenoate cement Japanese Journal of Conservative Dentistry 35 1346-1373.
21. Pashley DH (1984) Smear layer: Physiological considerations Operative Dentistry 3(Supplement 3) 13-29.
22. Powis DR, Folleras T, Merson SA & Wilson AD (1982) Improved adhesion of a glass ionomer cement to dentin and enamel Journal of Dental Research 61(12) 1416-1422.
23. Saito S, Tosaki S & Hirota K (1999) Characteristics of glass-ionomer cements in Advances in Glass-Ionomer Cements edited by Davidson CL & Mjör IA Chicago Quintessence Publishing Co p 15-50.
24. 3 Scandinavian Journal of Dental Research 89(4) 348-353.
25. Tanumiharja M, Burrow MF, Cimmino A & Tyas MJ (2001) The evaluation of four conditioners for glass ionomer cements using field-emission scanning electron microscopy Journal of Dentistry 29(2) 131-138.
26. Tanumiharja M, Burrow MF & Tyas MJ (2000) Microtensile bond strengths of glass ionomer (polyalkenoate) cements to dentine using four conditioners Journal of Dentistry 28(5) 361-366.
27. Watson TF (1999) Bonding glass-ionomer cements to tooth structure in Advances in Glass-Ionomer Cements edited by Davidson CL & Mjör IA Chicago Quintessence Publishing Co p 121-135.
28. White GJ, Beech DR & Tyas MJ (1989) Dentin smear layer: An asset or liability for bonding? Dental Materials 5(6) 379-383.
29. Yilmaz Y & Kirzioglu Z (1998) The evaluation of microleakage of four different restorative materials on the primary molars: An in vivo study Atatürk University Dental Faculty Journal 8 23-28.