A US valuation of the EQ-5D

Medical Care

Volumn 43, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 199-200

  Fryback, Dennis G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CORRELATION ANALYSIS; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; EDITORIAL; HEALTH CARE; HEALTH SERVICE; HEALTH STATUS; HEALTH SURVEY; MEDICAL RESEARCH; QUESTIONNAIRE; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; UNITED KINGDOM; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; EUROPE; HUMAN; QUALITY OF LIFE; SOCIOECONOMICS; UNITED STATES;

ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; EUROPE; HEALTH STATUS; HUMANS; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; UNITED STATES; VALUE OF LIFE;

EID: 14844285436     PISSN: 00257079     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00005650-200503000-00001     Document Type: Editorial

References (10)

1. Gold MR, Patrick DL, Torrance GW, et al. Identifying and valuing outcomes. In: Gold MR, Siegel JE, Russell LB, et al, eds. Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1996:82-134.
2. Busschbach J, Weijnen T, Nieuwenhuizen M, et al.A comparison of EQ-5D time trade-off values obtained in Germany, the United Kingdom, and Spain. In: Brooks R, Rabin R, de Charro F, eds. The Measurement and Valuation of Health Status Using EQ-5D: A European Perspective. Evidence From the EuroQol BIOMED Research Programme. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2003.
3. Shaw JW, Johnson JA, Coons SJ. US valuation of the EQ-5D health states: development and testing of the D1 valuation model. Med Care. 2005;43:203-220.
4. Feeny D, Torrance GW, Furlong W. Health Utilities Index. In: Spilker B, ed. Quality of Life and Pharmacoeconomics in Clinical Trials. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott-Raven Publishers; 1996:239-252.
5. Kaplan RM, Anderson JP. A general health policy model: update and applications. Health Serv Res. 1988;23:203-235.
6. Andresen EM, Rothenberg BM, Kaplan RM. Performance of a self-administered mailed version of the Quality of Well-Being (QWB-SA) questionnaire among older adults. Med Care. 1998;36:1349-1360.
7. Dolan P. Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states. Med Care. 1997;35:1095-1108.
8. Kind P. Guidelines for value sets in economic and non-economic studies using EQ-5D. In: Brook RH, Rabin R, de Charro F, eds. The Measurement and Valuation of Health Status Using EQ-5D: A European Perspective. Evidence From the EuroQol BIOMED Research Programme. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2003.
9. Johnson JA, Luo N, Shaw JW, et al. Valuations of EQ-5D health states: are the United States and United Kingdom different? Med Care. 2005; 43:221-228.
10. McHorney CA, Kosinski M, Ware JE Jr. Comparisons of the costs and quality of norms for the SF-36 health survey collected by mail versus telephone interview: results from a national survey. Med Care. 1994; 32:551-567.