An alternative way to model merit good arguments

Journal of Public Economics

Volumn 89, Issue 5-6, 2005, Pages 957-966

  Schroyen, Fred ^a  

^a NORWEGIAN SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (Norway)

Author keywords

Commodity taxation; Merits goods

Indexed keywords

EID: 14844284550     PISSN: 00472727     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2004.05.006     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Besley T. A simple model for merit good arguments Journal of Public Economics 35 1988 371-384
2. Capéau B. Ooghe E. Merit goods and phantom agents Economics Bulletin 8 8 2003 1-5
3. Decoster A. Schokkaert E. Equity and efficiency of a reform of Belgian indirect taxes Recherches Économiques de Louvain 55 1989 155-173
4. Feehan J. A simple model for merit good arguments - a comment Journal of Public Economics 43 1990 127-129
5. Fisher F.A. Shell K. Taste and quality change in the pure theory of the true cost-of-living index In: Wolfe J.N. (Ed.) Value, Capital and Growth: Papers in Honour of Sir John Hicks 1967 97-138 Edinburgh University Press Edinburgh
6. Kaplanoglou, G., Newbery, D., 2002. Indirect taxation in Greece: evaluation and possible reform. CES working paper 661, Munich.
7. Madden D. Labour supply, commodity demand and marginal tax reform Economic Journal 105 1995 485-497
8. Musgrave R. The Theory of Public Finance 1959 McGraw-Hill New York
9. Pazner E. Merit wants and the theory of taxation Public Finance 27 1972 460-472
10. Sandmo A. Ex post welfare economics and the theory of merit goods Economica 50 1983 19-33
11. Schroyen, F., 2003. An alternative way to model merit good arguments. Discussion paper 21/2002 (revised October 2003), Department of Economics, Norwegian School of Economics & Business Administration. (Available at (http://www.nhh.no/sam/res&publ/2002 /dp21-revised.pdf)
12. Schroyen F. Aasness J. Indirect marginal tax reform analysis for Norway 2002 Norwegian School of Economics & Business Administration Mimeo