Assessment of Software Measurement: An Information Quality Study

Proceedings - International Software Metrics Symposium

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 314-325

  Berry, Michael ^a,b   Jeffery, Ross ^a,b   Aurum, Aybüke ^b  

^a CSIRO   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION QUALITY (IQ); SOFTWARE MEASUREMENT; SOFTWARE PROJECTS;

COMPUTER SOFTWARE SELECTION AND EVALUATION; INFORMATION SERVICES; PROCESS CONTROL; PROJECT MANAGEMENT; QUALITY ASSURANCE; REQUIREMENTS ENGINEERING;

SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

EID: 14844283788     PISSN: 15301435     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/METRIC.2004.1357917     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (34)

1. Andersen, O. The Use of Software Engineering Data in Support of Project Management. Software Engineering Journal. 1990; (November).
2. Baddo, N., Hall, T. and Wilson D., Implementing a people focused SPI programme. Proc 11th European Software Control and Metrics Conference Munich April 2000. Shaker Publishing 2000
3. Basili, V. Rombach, D. The TAME Project: Towards Improvement Oriented Software Environments. IEEE Trans. Software Engineering. 1988; (SE-14(6)):758-773.
4. Berry, M. and Jeffery, R. An Instrument for Assessing Software Measurement Programs. Empirical Software Engineering An International Journal. 2000; 5(3): 183-200.
5. Berry, M. and Vandenbroek M., A Targeted Assessment of the Software Measurement Process. Proc. 7th International Software Metrics Symposium; London. Los Alamos, California; IEEE Computer Society 2001
6. Budlong, F. and Peterson, J., Software Metrics Capability Evaluation Guide. Version 2.0 ed. Utah: The Software Technology Support Center; 1995 Oct.
7. Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI®) Version 1.1 Staged Representation. Mar. 2002. http://www.sei.cmu.edu/publications/documents/02. reports/02tr029.html accessed: 16 Feb 2004
8. Daskalantonakis, M. K.; Yacobellis, R. H., and Basili, V. R. A Method for Assessing Software Measurement Technology. Quality Engineering. 1990; 3(10 1990):27-40.
9. Fenton, N. Software Metrics: A Rigorous Approach. London: Chapman & Hall, 1991.
10. Fenton, N. and Pfleeger, S. L. Software Metrics - A rigorous and practical approach. 2nd ed. London: Boston, Mass.: International Thomson Computer Press; PWS Publishing Co; 1997.
11. Goldenson, D.; Gopal A., and Mukhopadhyay T. (SEI/Carnegie Mellon University). Determinants of Success in Software Measurement Programs: Initial Results. 6th International Software Metrics Symposium; 1999 Boca Raton USA. IEEE Computer Society; 1999.
12. Goldenson, D.R., Jarzombek, J and Rout T. Measurement and Analysis in Capability Maturity Model Integration Models and Software Process Improvement, Crosstalk July 2003 accessed: Feb 16, 2004 www.stsc.hill.af.mil/crosstalk/2003/ 07/Goldenson.html
13. Grady, R. B. and Caswell, D. L. Software Metrics: Establishing a Company-wide Program. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall; 1987.
14. Hall, T and Fenton, N. Implementing software metrics the critical success factors. Software Quality Journal. 1994; 3((4)): 195-208.
15. Under Secretary of Defense accessed: 16 Feb 2004-02-16 http://www.acq.osd.mil/io/se/Adoption_Notice_for_15939.doc
16. ISO/IEC 15939:2002 Information Technology Software Measurement Process, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, 2002.
17. Jeffery, R. and Berry, M. A Framework for Evaluation and Prediction of Metrics Program Success. Proc. 1st IEEE International Software Metrics Symposium; 1993; Baltimore May 17-21. Los Alamitos: IEEE 1993.
18. Kahn, B.K., Strong, D.M. and Wang, R.Y. Information quality benchmarks: product and service performance, Communications of the ACM 45 (4ve), April 2002
19. Lee, Strong, Kahn and Wang, AIMQ: a methodology for information quality assessment Information and Management 40 (2002) 133-146
20. Lee, Y. W. and Strong, D., Process Knowledge and Data Quality Outcomes, Proc. Eighth International Conf. on Information Quality (ICIQ-03), Boston, November 2003 http://www.iqconference.org/ICIQ/iqproceedings.htm accessed: 16 February 2004
21. McGarry, J., Card, D., Jones, C., Layman, B., Clark, E., Dean, J., Hall, F. Practical Software Measurement Objective Information for Decision Makers, Addison Wesley, Boston; 2002.
22. Mendonca, M. G. and Basili, V.R. Validation of an Approach for Improving Existing Measurement Frameworks. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering. 2000 Jun; 26(6):494-499.
23. Paulk, M. C.; Weber, C. V.; Curtis, B.; Chrissis, M. B., and et al. The Capability maturity Model - Guidelines for Improving the Software Process. SEI Carnegie Mellon University: Addison Wesley Longman Inc.; 1994.
24. Rifkin, S. and Cox, C. Measurement in Practice. Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University; 1991 Jul; Technical Report CMU/SEI-91-TR-16
25. Rivet, M., Desharnais, J. and Abran A., A cognitive approach and the implementation of a measurement programme. Proc 11th European Software Control and Metrics Conf. Munich April 2000. Shaker Publishing 2000
26. Rombach, H. D., Practical benefits of goal-oriented measurement. Proceedings of the Annual Workshop of the Centre for Software Reliability; 1990 Sep: Elsevier.
27. Sauer, C. Deciding the Future for IS Failures. Currie, L. and Galliers B., ed. Rethinking Management Information Systems. New York: Oxford UP; 1999
28. Simmons, R.B. A Win-Win Metric Based Software Management Approach. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. 1992 Feb; Vol 39(No 1).
29. Return-On-Investment from Software Process Improvement Software Tech News: Vol 5:4 accessed: 16 Feb 2004 http://www.softwaretechnews.com/stn5-4/
30. Runeson, P.; Using Students as Experiment Subjects An Analysis on Graduate and Freshman Student Data", Proc 7th Int. Conf. on Empirical Assessment & Evaluation in Software Engineering, April. 2003 http://serg.telecom.lth.se/research/publications/docs/ 175_Students_as_subjects_final.pdf Accessed: May 2004
31. Tichy, W. F., "Hints for Reviewing Empirical Work in Software Engineering", Empirical Software Engineering, V. 5, N. 4, pages 309-312, Dec. 2000.
32. Carver, J.; Jaccheri, L.; Morasca, S.; Shull, F.; "Issues in using students in empirical studies in software engineering education", Software Metrics Symposium, 2003. Proc. 9th International, 3-5 Sep. 2003
33. Eppler, M. J. (2001), "The Concept of Information Quality: An Interdisciplinary Evaluation of Recent Information Quality Frameworks', Studies in Communication Sciences, Vol. 1, pp. 167-182
34. Price, R and Shanks, G. A Semiotic Information Quality Framework, Proc 2004 IFIP Int. Conf. on Decision Support