Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: Which factors influence the decision between the surgical techniques?;Laparoskopische vs. offene appendektomie: Welche faktoren beeinflussen die wahl der operationsmethode?

Zentralblatt fur Chirurgie

Volumn 130, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 48-54

  Horstmann, R ^a,c   Tiwisina, C ^a   Classen, C ^a   Palmes, D ^b   Gillessen, A ^a  

^a Herz Jesu Krankenhaus Munster   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL MÜNSTER   (Germany)

^c Herz Jesu Krankenhaus Munster Hiltrup   (Germany)

Author keywords

Appendicitis; Clinical reality; Conventional appendectomy; Laparoscopic appendectomy

Indexed keywords

C REACTIVE PROTEIN;

ACUTE APPENDICITIS; ADULT; AGE; AMBULATORY SURGERY; ANALGESIA; APPENDECTOMY; CLINICAL FEATURE; COMORBIDITY; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; GENDER; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HOSPITAL; HUMAN; INFLAMMATION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LENGTH OF STAY; LEUKOCYTE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; MORBIDITY; NIGHT; PATIENT SELECTION; PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; REVIEW; SURGEON; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT INDICATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ACUTE DISEASE; ADULT; ALGORITHMS; APPENDECTOMY; APPENDICITIS; APPENDIX; C-REACTIVE PROTEIN; CIRCADIAN RHYTHM; DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GERMANY; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; LENGTH OF STAY; LEUKOCYTE COUNT; MALE; OUTCOME AND PROCESS ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PATIENT SATISFACTION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS;

EID: 14744299510     PISSN: 0044409X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-836240     Document Type: Review

References (18)

1. Bauwens K, Schwenk W, Bohm B, Hasard O, Neudecker J, Muller JM. Recovery and duration of work disability after laparoscopic and conventional appendectomy. A prospective randomized study. Chirurg 1998; 69: 541-545
2. Gastinger I, Koch A, Manisch F, Schmidt U, Köckerling F, Lippert H. Die Bedeutung prospektiver multizentrischer Beobachtungsstudien für den Erkenntnisgewinn in der Chirurgie. Chirurg 2002; 73: 161-164
3. Golup R, Siddiqui F, Pohl D. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a metaanalysis. J Am Coll Surg 1998; 186: 545-553
4. Heikkinen TJ, Haukipuro K, Hulkko A. Cost-effective appendectomy. Open or laparoscopic? A prospective randomized study. Surg Endosc 1998; 12: 1204-1208
5. Hellberg A, Rudberg C, Kullman E. Prospective randomized multicentre study of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy. Br J Surg 1999; 86: 48-53
6. Hermanek P, Burmeister C, Gleisberg C, Bauer H. Perioperatives Management bei Appendektomie, Cholezystektomie und Leistenhernienreparation. Ist-Daten-Analyse der Qualitätssicherung Bayern. Viszeralchirurgie 2003; 38: 27-31
7. Kald A, Kullman E, Anderberg B, Wiren M, Carlsson P, Ringqvist I, Rudberg C. Cost-minimation analysis of laparoscopic and open appendectomy. Eur J Surg 1999; 165: 579-582
8. Kathouda N, Frielander MH, Grant SW. Intraabdominal abscess rate after laparoscopic appendectomy. Am J Surg 2000; 180: 456-461
9. Koch A, Manisch F, Gastinger I. Appendizitis: Wann laparoskopisch und wann konventionell operieren? Chir Gastroenterol 2000; 16: 126-130
10. Larsson PG, Henriksson G, Olsson M, Boris J, Ströberg P, Tronstad SE, Skullman S. Laparoscopy reduces unnecessary appendectomies and improves diagnosis in fertile woman. A randomized study. Surg Endosc 2001; 15: 200-202
11. Lippert H, Koch A, Marusch F, Wolff S, Gastinger I. Offene versus laparoskopische Appendektomie. Chirurg 2002; 73: 791-798
12. Milewczyk M, Michalik M, Ciesielski M. A prospective randomized unicenter study comparing laparoscopic and open treatments of acute appendicitis. Surg Endosc 2003; 17: 1023-1028
13. Ohmanns C, Frank C, Kraemer M, Yang Q. Neues zur Epidemiologie der akuten Appendizitis. Chirurg 2002; 73: 769-779
14. Pedersen AG, Petersen OB, Wara P, Running H, Qvist N, Laurberg S. Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy. Br J Surg 2001; 88: 200-205
15. Sauerland S, Lefering R, Holthausen U, Neugebauer EAM. Laparoscopic vs. conventional appendectomy - a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Langenbecks Arch Surg 1998; 383: 289-295
16. Temple LK, Litwin DE, McLeod RS. A meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in patients suspected of having acute appendicitis. Can J Surg 1999; 42: 377-383
17. Williams MD, Collins JN, Wright TF, Fenoglio ME. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy. South Med J 1996; 89: 668-674
18. Zaninotto G, Rossi M, Anselmino M, Costantini M, Pianalto S, Baldan N, Pizzato D, Ancona E. Laparoscopic versus conventional surgery for suspected appendicitis in women. Surg Endosc 1995; 9: 337-340