Stroboscopy as a research instrument: Development of a perceptual evaluation tool

Laryngoscope

Volumn 115, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 423-428

  Rosen, Clark A ^a  

^a University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine   (United States)

Author keywords

Analysis; Laryngeal; Perceptual; Stroboscopy; Video

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONSENSUS DEVELOPMENT; DIGITALIZATION; EVALUATION; HUMAN; LARYNX DISORDER; PARAMETER; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY; STROBOSCOPY; VALIDATION PROCESS; VIDEORECORDING; VIDEOTAPE; VOCAL CORD;

HUMANS; LARYNGEAL DISEASES; OBSERVER VARIATION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RESEARCH; STROBOSCOPY; VIBRATION; VIDEOTAPE RECORDING; VOCAL CORDS; VOICE; VOICE DISORDERS;

EID: 14744295469     PISSN: 0023852X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.mlg.0000157830.38627.85     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Czermak J. Ueber den Kehlkopfspiegel. Wiener Med Wochenschrift 1858;13:196-198.
2. Garcia M. Observation on the Human Voice. 1855;7:397-410.
3. Oertel M. Ueber eine neue laryngostroboskopische Untersuchungsmethode des Kehikopfes. Centralbl Med Wiss 1878;16:81-82.
4. Oertel M. Laryngo-stroboskop und die laryngostroboskopische Untersuchung. Arch Laryngol Rhinol 1895;3:1-16.
5. Woo P. Quantification of videostrobolaryngoscopic findings: measurements of the normal glottal cycle. Laryngoscope 1996;106:1-16.
6. Zeitels SM. Atlas of Phonomicrosurgery and Other Endolaryngeal Procedures for Benign and Malignant Disease. San Diego, CA: Singular, 2001, p 8.
7. Colden D, Zeitels SM, Hillman RE, Jarobe J, Bunting G, Spanou K. Stroboscopic assessment of vocal fold keratosis and glottic cancer. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2001;110:293-298.
8. Sercarz JA, Berke GS, Arnstein D, Gerratt B, Natividad M. A new technique for quantitative measurement of laryngeal videostroboscopic images. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1991;117:871-875.
9. Noordzij JP, Woo P. Glottal Area Waveform Analysis of Benign Vocal Fold Lesions Before and After Surgery. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2000;109:441-446.
10. Kreiman J, Gerratt BR, Kempster GB, Erman A, Berke GS. Perceptual evaluation of voice quality: review, tutorial, and a framework for future research. J Speech Hearing Res 1993;36:21-40.
11. Kent RD. Hearing and believing: some limits to the auditory-perceptual assessment of speech and voice disorders. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 1966;5:7-23.
12. M., H., Clinical Examination of the Voice. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981, pp 1-98.
13. Bless D, Hirano M, Feder RJ. Video stroboscopic evaluation of the larynx. Ear Nose Throat J 1987;289-296.
14. Rosen CA, Murry T. Diagnostic laryngeal endoscopy. In The Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America Voice Disorders and Phonosurgery I, Rosen CA, Murry T, editors. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders, 2000, p 751-758.
15. Hirano M, Bless D. Videostroboscopic Examination of the Larynx, San Diego, CA: Singular Publishing Group, 1993.
16. Ebel R. Estimation of the reliability of ratings. Psychometrika 1951;16:407-424.
17. Fleiss JL. The Design and Analysis of Clinical Experiments. New York: Wiley, 1986.
18. Landis JR, Koch GG. The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data. Biometrics 1977;33:159-174.
19. Donner A, Eliasziw M. Sample size requirements for reliability studies. Stat Med 1987;6:441-448.
20. Eliasziw M, Donner A: A cost-function approach to the design of reliability studies. Stat Med 1987;6:647-655.