메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 218, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 293-298

North American axle failure experience

Author keywords

Axle failures; Failure statistics; Stress

Indexed keywords

COAL; FAILURE ANALYSIS; LOADING; LOADS (FORCES); RAILROADS; STATISTICS; STRESS ANALYSIS;

EID: 14744292483     PISSN: 09544097     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1243/0954409043125941     Document Type: Conference Paper
Times cited : (34)

References (9)
  • 1
    • 33646175147 scopus 로고
    • Section G, Part I, (Association of American Railroads, Washington, DC)
    • Manual of Standards and Recommended Practices, Section G, Part I, 1990, pp. 65-88 (Association of American Railroads, Washington, DC).
    • (1990) Manual of Standards and Recommended Practices , pp. 65-88
  • 2
    • 14744306628 scopus 로고
    • Wheel, axle, and rail stress problems related to higher capacity cars - Axle problems
    • Anthology of Rail Vehicle Dynamics, (American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York)
    • Horger, O. Wheel, axle, and rail stress problems related to higher capacity cars - axle problems. In Anthology of Rail Vehicle Dynamics, Vol. 3, Axles, Wheels, and Rail-Wheel Interaction, 1973, pp. 49-58 (American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York).
    • (1973) Axles, Wheels, and Rail-wheel Interaction , vol.3 , pp. 49-58
    • Horger, O.1
  • 3
    • 24544448147 scopus 로고
    • Railroad axle design factors
    • 23 January
    • Byrne, R. Railroad axle design factors. ASME paper 67-RR-3, 23 January 1967.
    • (1967) ASME Paper 67-RR-3
    • Byrne, R.1
  • 4
    • 14744292749 scopus 로고
    • Axles with improved fatigue strength
    • United States Steel, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
    • Axles with improved fatigue strength. Railroad Facts Technical Report 3, United States Steel, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 1969.
    • (1969) Railroad Facts Technical Report , vol.3
  • 5
    • 84866349330 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • A comparison of railroad axle stress results using different design sizes, loading criteria, and analysis methods
    • paper RTD 25721 (American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York)
    • Dedmon, S., Pilch, J. and Lonsdale, C. A comparison of railroad axle stress results using different design sizes, loading criteria, and analysis methods. In Proceedings of the 2001 ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress, 2001, Vol. 3, paper RTD 25721 (American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York).
    • (2001) Proceedings of the 2001 ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress , vol.3
    • Dedmon, S.1    Pilch, J.2    Lonsdale, C.3
  • 7
    • 14744285166 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Railway applications - Wheelsets and bogies, non-powered axles - Method of design
    • CEN prEN 13103, European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, January
    • Railway applications - wheelsets and bogies, non-powered axles - method of design. CEN prEN 13103, Final Draft, European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, January 1999.
    • (1999) Final Draft


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.