The locus and time course of long-term morphological priming

Language and Cognitive Processes

Volumn 20, Issue 1-2, 2005, Pages 115-138

  Rueckl, Jay G ^a,b   Galantucci, Bruno ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

^b HASKINS LABORATORIES   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LANGUAGE ABILITY; LANGUAGE TEST; LATENT PERIOD; MORPHOLOGY; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE; TIME; VISUAL INFORMATION; VISUAL STIMULATION; WORD RECOGNITION;

EID: 14644444510     PISSN: 01690965     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01690960444000188     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Baayen, R. H., Dijkstra, T., & Schreuder, R., (1997). Singulars and plurals in Dutch: Evidence for a parallel dual route model. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 94-117.
2. Bentin, S., & Feldman, L. B. (1990). The contribution of morphological and semantic relatedness to repetition priming at short and long lags: Evidence from Hebrew. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 42A (4), 693-711.
3. Bowers, J. S. (1996). Different perceptual codes support priming for words and pseudowords: Was Morton right all along? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 1336-1353.
4. Brown, J. S., & Carr, T. H. (1993). Limits on perceptual abstraction in reading: Asymmetric transfer between surface forms differing in typicality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 1277-1296.
5. Caramazza, A., Laudanna, A., & Romani, C. (1988). Lexical access and inflectional morphology. Cognition, 28, 297-332.
6. Drews, E., & Zwisterlood, P. (1995). Morphological and orthographic similarity in visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 1098-1116.
7. Feldman, L. B. (1991). The contribution of morphology to word recognition. Psychological Research, 53, 33-41.
8. Feldman, L. B. (Ed.). (1995). Morphological aspects of language processing. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
9. Feldman, L. B. (2000). Are morphological effects distinguishable from the effects of shared meaning and shared form? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26 1431-1444.
10. Feldman, L. B. & Fowler, C. A. (1987). The inflected noun system in Serbo-Croatian: Lexical representation of morphological structure. Memory and Cognition, 15 (1), 1-12.
11. Frauenfelder, U. H., & Schreuder, R. (1991). Constraining psycholinguistic models of morphological processing and representation: The role of productivity. In G. E. Booij & J. van Marle (Eds.), Yearbook of morphology 1991 (pp. 165-183). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
12. Frost, R., Forster, K., & Deutsch, A. (1997). What can we learn from the morphology of Hebrew? A masked priming investigation of morphological representation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 1-28.
13. Frost, R., & Grainger, J. (Eds.). (2000). Cross-linguistic perspectives on morphological processing. [Special Issue of Language and Cognitive Processes.] Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
14. Giraudo, H., & Grainger, J. (2001). Priming complex words: Evidence for supralexical representation of morphology. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 127-131.
15. Gonnerman, L., Devlin, J., Andersen, E. S., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1995). "Morphological" priming without a morphological level of representation. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 1, 142.
16. Henderson, L. (1985). Towards a psychology of morphemes. In A. W. Ellis (Ed.), Progress in the psychology of language, vol. 1 (pp. 15-72). Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd.
17. Henderson, L., Wallis, J., & Knight, K. (1984). Morphemic structure and lexical access. In H. Bouma & D. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and performance X: Control of language processes (pp. 211-226). Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd.
18. Jacoby, L. (1983). Perceptual enhancement: Persistent effects of an experience. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9, 21-38.
19. Kirsner, K., Dunn, J., & Standen, P. (1989). Domain-specific resources in word recognition. In S. Lewandowsky, J. C. Dunn, & K. Kirsner (Eds.), Implicit memory: Theoretical issues (pp. 99-122). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
20. Klein, J. P., & Moeschberger, M. L. (1997). Survival analysis: Techniques for censored and truncated data. Berlin: Springer.
21. Kucera, H., & Francis, W. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
22. Laudanna, A., & Burani, C. (1995). Distributional properties of derivational affixes: implications for processing. In L. B. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 345-364). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
23. Lee, E. T. (1992). Statistical methods for survival data analysis. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
24. Lukatela, G., Gligorijevic, B., Kostic, A., & Turvey, M. T. (1980). Representation of inflected nouns in the internal lexicon. Memory and Cognition, 8, 415-423.
25. Manelis, L., & Tharp, D. A. (1977). The processing of affixed words. Memory and Cognition, 5, 690-695.
26. Marslen-Wilson, W., Tyler, L. K., Waksler, R., & Older, L. (1994). Morphology and meaning in the English mental lexicon. Psychological Review, 101, 3-33.
27. Marsolek, C. J., Kosslyn, S. M., & Squire, L. R. (1992). Form-specific visual priming in the right cerebral hemisphere. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 492-508.
28. Morton, J. (1969). Interaction of information in word identification. Psychological Review, 76, 165-178.
29. Morton, J. (1979). Facilitation in word recognition: Experiments causing a change in the logogen model. In P. A. Kolers, M. E. Wrostal, & H. Bouma (Eds.), Processing visible language I (pp. 259-268). New York: Plenum Press.
30. Murrell, G. A., & Morton, J. (1974). Word recognition and morphemic structure. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 102, 963-968.
31. Napps, S. E., & Fowler, C. A. (1987). Formal relationships among words and the organization of the mental lexicon. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 16, 257-272.
32. Plaut, D. C., & Gonnerman, L. M. (2000). Are non-semantic morphological effects incompatible with a distributed connectionist approach to lexical processing? Language and Cognitive Processes, 15 445-485.
33. Prinzmetal, W., Treiman, R., & Rho, S. (1986). How to see a reading unit. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 461-475.
34. Ratcliff, R., & McKoon, G. (1996). Bias effects in implicit memory tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 754-767.
35. Raveh, M. & Rueckl, J. (2000). Equivalent effects of inflected and derived primes: Long-term morphological priming in fragment completion and lexical decision. Journal of Memory and Language, 42 103-119.
36. Roediger, H. L. (1990). Implicit memory: Retention without awareness. American Psychologist, 45, 1043-1056.
37. Roediger, H. L., & McDermott, K. B. (1993). Implicit memory in normal human subject. In H. Spinnler & F. Boller (Eds.), Handbook of neuropsychology, (Vol. 8, pp. 63-130). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
38. Rueckl, J. G. (2002). A connectionist perspective on repetition priming. In J. S. Bowers & C. Marsolek (Eds.), Rethinking implicit memory (pp. 67-104). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
39. Rueckl, J. G., & Mathew, S. (1999). Implicit memory for phonological processes in visual stem completion. Memory and Cognition, 27, 1-11.
40. Rueckl, J. G., & Raveh, M. (1999). The influence of morphological regularities on the dynamics of a connectionist network. Brain and Language, 68, 110-117.
41. Rueckl, J. G., Mikolinski, M., Raveh, M., Miner, C., & Mars, F. (1997). Morphological priming, fragment completion, and connectionist networks. Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 382-405
42. Seidenberg, M., & Gonnerman, L. (2000). Explaining derivational morphology as the convergence of codes Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 353-361.
43. Stolz, J. A., & Feldman, L. B. (1995). The role of orthographic and semantic transparency of the base morpheme in morphological processing. In L. B. Feldman (Ed.). Morphological aspects of language processing. (pp. 109-130). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
44. Taft, M. (1994). Interactive-activation as a framework for understanding morphological processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9, 271-294.
45. Taft, M., & Forster, K. I. (1975). Lexical storage and retrieval of prefixed words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 638-647.
46. Tenpenny, P. L. (1995). Abstractionist vs. episodic theories of repetition priming and word identification. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 2, 339-363.
47. Weldon, M. S. (1991). Mechanisms underlying priming on perceptual tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 17, 526-541.
48. Weldon, M. S. (1993). The time course of perceptual and conceptual contributions to word fragment completion priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 19, 1010-1023.
49. Winnick, W. A., & Daniel, S. A. (1970). Two kinds of response priming in tachistoscopic recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 84, 74-81.