Autocorrelated SPC for non-normal situations

Quality and Reliability Engineering International

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 131-161

  Castagliola, Philippe ^a   Tsung, Fugee ^b  

^a ECOLE DES MINES DE NANTES   (France)

^b HONG KONG UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Non normality; Residual based control chart; Scaled weighted variance

Indexed keywords

APPROXIMATION THEORY; CONDITION MONITORING; CORRELATION METHODS; MARKOV PROCESSES; MONTE CARLO METHODS; NORMAL DISTRIBUTION; QUALITY CONTROL; WEIBULL DISTRIBUTION;

NON-NORMALITY; RESIDUAL-BASED CONTROL CHART; SCALED WEIGHTED VARIANCE; STATISTICAL PROCESS CONTROL (SPC);

PROCESS CONTROL;

EID: 14644444228     PISSN: 07488017     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/qre.612     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Tsung F, Apley DW. The dynamic T-squared chart for monitoring feedback-controlled processes. IIE Transactions 2002; 34:1043-1053.
2. Montgomery DC, Mastrangelo CM. Some statistical process control methods for autocorrelated data. Journal of Quality Technology 1991; 23:179-204.
3. Apley DW, Tsung F. The autoregressive T-squared chart for monitoring univariate autocorrelated processes. Journal of Quality Technology 2002; 34:80-96.
4. Alwan LC, Roberts HV. Time-series modeling for statistical process control. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 1988; 16:83-95.
5. Moskowitz H, Wardell DG, Plante RD. Run-length distributions of special-cause control charts for correlated processes. Technometrics 1994; 36:3-27.
6. Vander Wiel SA. Monitoring processes that wander using integrated moving averages. Technometrics 1996; 38:139-151.
7. Hu SJ, Roan C. Change patterns of time series-based control charts. Journal of Quality Technology 1996; 28:302-312.
8. Superville CR, Adams BM. The performance of tracking signals and control charts in process monitoring. International Journal of Operations and Quantitative Management 1995; 1(2):131-143.
9. Burrows PM. X̄ control schemes for a production variable with skewed distribution. The Statistician 1962; 12(4):296-312.
10. Burr IW. The effect of non-normality on constants for X̄ and R charts. Industrial Quality Control 1967; 24:563-569.
11. Schilling EG, Nelson PR. The effect of non-normality on the control limits of X̄ charts. Journal of Quality Technology 1976; 8(4):183-188.
12. Balakrishnan N, Kocherlakota S. Effects of non-normality on X̄ charts: Single assignable cause model. Sankhyā B 1986; 48:439-444.
13. Hapuarachchi KP, Chan LK, Macpherson BD. Robustness of X̄ and R charts. IEEE Transactions on Reliability 1988; 37:117-123.
14. Yourstone SA, Zimmer WJ. Non-normality and the design of control charts for average. Decision Sciences 1992; 23(5): 1099-1113.
15. Borror CM, Montgomery DC, Runger GC. Robustness of the EWMA control chart to non-normality. Journal of Quality Technology 1999; 31:309-316.
16. Stoumbos ZG, Sullivan JH. Robustness to non-normality of the multivariate EWMA control chart. Journal of Quality Technology 2002; 34:260-276.
17. Testik MC, Runger GC, Borror CM. Robustness properties of multivariate EWMA control charts. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 2003; 19:31-38.
18. Ferrell EB. Control Charts for log-normal universe. Industrial Quality Control 1958; 15:4-6.
19. Nelson PR. Control charts for Weibull processes with standards given. IEEE Transactions on Reliability 1979; 28:283-288.
20. Cowden DJ. Statistical Methods in Quality Control. Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1957.
21. Choobineh F, Ballard JL. Control-limits of QC charts for skewed distribution using weighted-variance. IEEE Transactions on Reliability 1987; 36:473-477.
22. Choobineh F, Branting D. A simple approximation for semivariance. European Journal of Operational Research 1986; 27:364-370.
23. Bai DS, Choi IS. X̄ and R control charts for skewed populations. Journal of Quality Technology 1995; 27(2):120-131.
24. Plante R, Seppala T, Moskowitz H, Tang J. Statistical process control via the subgroup bootstrap. Journal of Quality Technology 1995; 27(2):139-153.
25. Jones LA, Woodall WH. The performance of bootstrap control charts. Journal of Quality Technology 1998; 30(4):362-375.
26. Willemain TR, Runger GC. Designing control charts using an empirical reference distribution. Journal of Quality Technology 1996; 28(1):31-38.
27. Alloway Jr JA, Raghavachari M. Control charts based on the Hodges-Lehmann estimator. Journal of Quality Technology 1991; 23(4):336-347.
28. Pappanastos EA, Adams BM. Alternative designs of the Hodges-Lehmann control chart. Journal of Quality Technology 1996; 28(2):213-223.
29. Castagliola P. X̄ control chart for skewed populations using a scaled weighted variance method. International Journal of Reliability, Quality and Safety Engineering 2000; 7(3):237-252.
30. Pyzdek T. Process capability analysis using personal computers. Quality Engineering 1992; 4(3):419-440.
31. Farnum NR. Using Johnson curves to describe non-normal process data. Quality Engineering 1997; 9(2):329-336.
32. Castagliola P. Control charts for data having a symmetrical distribution with a positive kurtosis. Recent Advances in Reliability and Quality Engineering, Pham H (ed.). World Scientific: Singapore, 2001; 1-16.
33. Box GP, Jenkins GM, Reinsel GC. Time Series Analysis. Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1994.
34. Montgomery DC. Introduction to Statistical Quality Control (4th edn). Wiley: New York, 2001.
35. Adams BM, Tseng I. Robustness of forecast-based monitoring schemes. Journal of Quality Technology 1998; 30:328-339.