Levels of abstraction in designs of human-computer interaction: The case of e-mail

Computers in Human Behavior

Volumn 21, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 817-830

  Te'eni, Dov ^a   Sani Kuperberg, Zohar ^b  

^a TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

^b BAR ILAN UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

Design; E mail; Human computer interaction; Levels of abstraction

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; DATA PROCESSING; ELECTRONIC MAIL; HUMAN ENGINEERING; PROBLEM SOLVING; USER INTERFACES;

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION DESIGN; LEVELS OF ABSTRACTION (LOA);

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION;

EID: 14644435155     PISSN: 07475632     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2004.02.028     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Adams A.D., Todd P.A., Nelson R.R. A comparative evaluation of the impact of electronic and voice mail on organizational communication. Information & Management. 24(1):1993;9-21
2. Batra D., Antony S.R. Consulting support during conceptual database design in the presence of redundancy in requirements specifications: An empirical study. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. 54(1):2001;25-51
3. Berger C.R. Message plans, communication failure and mutual adaptation during social interaction. Palmer M.T., Barnett G.A. Communication Sciences. mutual influence in interpersonal communication: Theory and research in cognition, affect and behavior. Volume XIV:1988;91-111 Ablex Publishing, Stamford, CO
4. Carlson J.R., Zmud R.W. Channel expansion theory and the experimental nature of media richness perceptions. Academy of Management Journal. 42(2):1999;153-170
5. Davern, M., Te'eni, D., Moon, J. Y. (2000). Content versus structure in information environments: A longitudinal analysis of website preferences. In Proceedings of the 21st annual international conference on information systems, ICIS'2000 Brisbane
6. Dennis A.R., Kinney S.T. Testing media richness theory in the new media: The effect of cues, feedback, and task equivocality. Information Systems Research. 9(3):1998;256-273
7. Duncker, K. (1945). In J. F. Dashiell (Ed.), On problem solving, psychological monographs. The American psychological Association, DC
8. Moran T.P. The command language grammar: A representation for the user interface of interactive computer systems. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies. 15(1):1981;3-50
9. Norman D. Cognitive artifacts. Carroll J.M. Designing Interaction Cambridge. 1991;MIT Press, Mass
10. Rasmussen J. Information processing and human-machine interaction - an approach to cognitive engineering. 1986;Elsevier, Amsterdam
11. Satzinger J., Olfman L. User interface consistency across end-user applications: Effects on the mental model development process. Journal of Management Information Systems. 14(4):1998;167-194
12. Shneiderman B. Designing the user interface: Strategies for effective human-computer interaction. 1998;Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA
13. Srinivasan A., Te'eni D. Modeling as constrained problem solving: An empirical study of the data modeling process. Management Science. 3(41):1995;419-434
14. Te'eni, D. (2001). A cognitive-affective model of organizational communication for designing IT, MIS Quarterly (Review), (25)2, 1-62. Available: http://misq.org/archivist/bestpaper/teeni.pdf
15. Tero A., Briggs P. Consistency versus compatibility: A question of levels? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. 40(5):1994;879-894
16. Vallacher R.R., Wegner D.M. What do people think they're doing. Action identification and human behavior. Psychological Review. 94(1):1987;3-15
17. Winer B.J. Statistical Principles in Experimental Design. second ed.:1971;McGraw Hill, New York