Mechanical effects of the extended trochanteric osteotomy

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery

Volumn 87, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 521-529

  Noble, Andrew R ^a   Branham, Daniel B ^a   Willis, Mark C ^a   Owen, John R ^a   Cramer, Benjamin W ^a   Wayne, Jennifer S ^a   Jiranek, William A ^a  

^a VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BONE DENSITY; BONE STRENGTH; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMUR OSTEOTOMY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMPLANTATION; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TORSION; TRONCHANTERIC OSTEOTOMY;

EID: 14644434447     PISSN: 00219355     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.C.00759     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Aribindi R, Paprosky W, Nourbash P, Kronick J, Barba M. Extended proximal femoral osteotomy. Instr Course Lect. 1999;48:19-26.
2. Chen WM, McAuley JP, Engh CA Jr, Hopper RH Jr, Engh CA. Extended slide trochanteric osteotomy for revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000;82:1215-9.
3. Miner TM, Momberger NG, Chong D, Paprosky WL. The extended trochanteric osteotomy in revision hip arthroplasty: a critical review of 166 cases at mean 3-year, 9-month follow-up. J Arthroplasty. 2001;16(8 Suppl 1):188-94.
4. Younger TI, Bradford MS, Magnus RE, Paprosky WG. Extended proximal femoral osteotomy. A new technique for femoral revision arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1995;10:329-38.
5. McGrory BJ, Bal BS, Harris WH. Trochanteric osteotomy for total hip arthroplasty: six variations and indications for their use. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 1996;4:258-67.
6. Huffman GR, Ries MD. Combined vertical and horizontal cable fixation of an extended trochanteric osteotomy site. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85:273-7.
7. Chassin EP, Silverton CD, Berzins A, Rosenberg AG. Implant stability in revision total hip arthroplasty: allograft bone packing following extended proximal femoral osteotomy. J Arthroplasty. 1997;12:863-8.
8. Paprosky WG, Sporer SM. Controlled femoral fracture: easy in. J Arthroplasty. 2003;18(3 Suppl 1):91-3.
9. Leggon RE, Lindsey RW, Panjabi MM. Strength reduction and the effects of treatment of long bones with diaphyseal defects involving 50% of the cortex. J Orthop Res. 1988;6:540-6.
10. Edgerton BC, An KN, Morrey BF. Torsional strength reduction due to cortical defects in bone. J Orthop Res. 1990;8:851-5.
11. Kerry RM, Masri BA, Garbuz DS, Duncan CP. The vascularized scaphoid window for access to the femoral canal in revision total hip arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect. 1999;48:9-11.
12. Ambrose CG, Kiebzak GM, Sabonghy EP, Tabor OB, Peindl RD, Clanton TO, Anderson RA, Davis WH. Biomechanical testing of cadaveric specimens: importance of bone mineral density assessment. Foot Ankle Int. 2002;23:850-5.
13. Carter DR, Hayes WC. Bone compressive strength: the influence of density and strain rate. Science. 1976;194:1174-6.
14. Carter DR, Hayes WC. The compressive behavior of bone as a two-phase porous structure. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1977;59:954-62.
15. Goh JC, Shah KM, Bose K. Biomechanical study on femoral neck fracture fixation in relation to bone mineral density. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 1995;10:304-8.
16. Wu CC, Au MK, Wu SS, Lin LC. Risk factors for postoperative femoral fracture in cementless hip arthroplasty. J Formos Med Assoc. 1999;98:190-4.
17. Masri BA, Campbell DG, Garbuz DS, Duncan CP. Seven specialized exposures for revision hip and knee replacement. Orthop Clin North Am. 1998;29:229-40.