A five-minute, but not a fifteen-minute, conditioning trial duration induces conditioned place preference for cocaine administration into the olfactory tubercle

Synapse

Volumn 56, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 57-59

  Ikemoto, Satoshi ^a   Donahue, Kathleen M ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE   (United States)

Author keywords

Olfactory tubercle; Reinforcement; Reward

Indexed keywords

COCAINE;

ARTICLE; CONDITIONING; INJECTION SITE; NONHUMAN; OLFACTORY BULB; PLACE PREFERENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; REINFORCEMENT; REWARD;

ANIMALS; COCAINE; CONDITIONING, OPERANT; MALE; OLFACTORY PATHWAYS; RATS; RATS, WISTAR; SELF ADMINISTRATION; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 14644432377     PISSN: 08874476     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/syn.20124     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Carr GD, White NM. 1983. Conditioned place preference from intra-accumbens but not intra-caudate amphetamine injections. Life Sci 33:2551-2557.
2. Ettenberg A, Raven MA, Danluck DA, Necessary BD. 1999. Evidence for opponent-process actions of intravenous cocaine. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 64:507-512.
3. Ikemoto S. 2002. Ventral striatal anatomy of locomotor activity induced by cocaine, d-amphetamine, dopamine and D1/D2 agonists. Neuroscience 113:939-955.
4. Ikemoto S. 2003. Involvement of the olfactory tubercle in cocaine reward: intracranial self-administration studies. J Neurosci 23:9305-9311.
5. Iwamoto ET. 1990. Nicotine conditions place preferences after intracerebral administration in rats. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 100:251-257.
6. Liao RM, Chang YH, Wang SH, Lan CH. 2000. Distinct accumbal subareas are involved in place conditioning of amphetamine and cocaine. Life Sci 67:2033-2043.
7. van der Kooy D, Mucha RF, O'Shaughnessy M, Bucenieks P. 1982. Reinforcing effects of brain microinjections of morphine revealed by conditioned place preference. Brain Res 243:107-117.