Problematic interviewee behaviors in qualitative research

Western Journal of Nursing Research

Volumn 27, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 188-199

  Collins, Melinda ^a   Shattell, Mona ^b   Thomas, Sandra P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA   (United States)

Author keywords

Phenomenological study; Qualitative interviewing; Social desirability; Validity threats

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; INTERVIEW; LITERATURE; PHENOMENOLOGY; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; SOCIAL DESIRABILITY;

BEHAVIOR; INTERVIEWS; NURSING METHODOLOGY RESEARCH; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SOCIAL DESIRABILITY;

EID: 14644427149     PISSN: 01939459     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0193945904268068     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Beauvois, M. (2002, Spring). The experience of graduate students in a department of modern foreign languages. Paper presented at Faculty Colloquium, Department of Modern Foreign Languages, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN.
2. Berreman, G. D. (1962). Behind many masks: Ethnography and impression management in a Himalayan village (Monograph 4). New York: Society for Applied Anthropology.
3. Cooley, C. H. (1922). Human nature and the social order. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.
4. Cutcliffe, J. R. (2002). Ethics committees, vulnerable groups and paternalism: The case for considering the benefits of participating in qualitative research interviews. In J. Dooher & R. Byrt (Eds.), Empowerment and participation: Power, influence and control in health care (pp. 204-219). London: Quay Books.
5. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2000). Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
6. Dingwall, R. (1997). Accounts, interviews, and observations. In G. Miller & R. Dingwall (Eds.), Context and method in qualitative research (pp. 51-65). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7. Fontana, A., & Frey, J. H. (2000). The interview: From structured questions to negotiated text. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8. Gadamer, H.-G. (1975). Truth and method. New York: Seabury.
9. Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday Anchor.
10. Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face behavior. Chicago: Aldine.
11. Hutchinson, S., & Wilson, S. K. (1992). Validity threats in scheduled semistructured research interviews. Nursing Research, 41, 117-119.
12. Kvale, S. (1996). Interviews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13. Lawler, J. (1993). Behind the screens: Nursing, somology, and the problem of the body. Redwood City, CA: Benjamin-Cummings.
14. Locker, D. (1981). Symptoms and illness: The cognitive organization of disorder. London: Tavistock.
15. Lipson, J., & Meleis, A. (1989). Methodological issues in research with immigrants. Medical Anthropology, 12, 103-115.
16. Lipson, J., & Meleis, A. (1999). Research with immigrants and refugees. In A. Hinshaw, S. Feetham, & J. Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of clinical nursing research (pp. 87-106). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17. Mazeland, H., & ten Have, P. (1996). Essential tensions in (semi-) open research interviews. In I. Maso & F. Wester (Eds.), The deliberate dialogue: Qualitative perspectives on the interview (pp. 87-113). Brussels, Belgium: VUB University Press. Retrieved January 9, 2004, from www.pscw.uva.nl/emca/ET.htm
18. Muff, J. (1988). Women's issues in nursing: Socialization, sexism and stereotyping. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.
19. Oakley, A. (1981). Interviewing women: A contradiction in terms. In H. Roberts (Ed.), Doing feminist research (pp. 30-61). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
20. Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2004). Nursing research: Principles and methods (7th ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams, & Wilkins.
21. Rapley, T. J. (2001 ). The art(fulness) of open-ended interviewing: Some considerations on analyzing interviews. Qualitative Research, 1, 303-323.
22. Shattell, M. M. (2002a). "Eventually it'll be over:" The dialectic between confinement and freedom in the phenomenal world of the hospitalized patient. In S. P. Thomas & H. R. Pollio (Eds. ), Listening to patients: A phenomenological approach to nursing research and practice (pp. 214-236). New York: Springer.
23. Shattell, M. M. (2002b). "Make them your friend": A phenomenological study of patients' experience soliciting nursing care in the hospital setting. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Tennessee, Knoxville.
24. Shiner, M., & Newburn, T. (1997). Definitely, maybe not? The normalization of recreational drug use amongst young people. Sociology, 31, 511-529.
25. Thomas, S. P., & Pollio, H. R. (2002). Listening to patients: A phenomenological approach to nursing research and practice. New York: Springer.