A place for the future?: Residence and continuity in women’s narratives of their lives

Narrative Inquiry

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 193-215

  Taylor, Stephanie ^a  

^a OPEN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 14644425103     PISSN: 13876740     EISSN: 15699935     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1075/ni.13.1.07tay     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Abell, J., Stokoe, E., & Billig, M. (2000). Narrative and the discursive (re)construction of events. In M. Andrews (Ed.), Lines of narrative: Psychosocial perspectives (pp. 180-192). London and New York: Routledge.
2. Anderson, B. (1983). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. London: Verso.
3. Andrews, M. (2000). Lines of narrative: Psychosocial perspectives. London: Routledge.
4. Billig, M. (1995). Banal nationalism. London: Sage.
5. Billig, M. (1999). Critical discourse analysis and conversation analysis: An exchange between Michael Billig and Emanuel A. Schegloff. Discourse & Society, 10(4), 543-558.
6. Butler, J. (1999). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York and London: Routledge.
7. Carabine, J. (2001). Unmarried motherhood 1830-1990: A genealogical analysis. In M. Wetherell, S. Taylor, & S. Yates (Eds.), Discourse as data: A guide for analysis (pp. 267-310). London: Sage.
8. Cohen, G., & Taylor, S. (1998). Reminiscence and ageing. Ageing and Society, 18, 601-610.
9. Crossley, M. L. (2000a). Narrative psychology, trauma and the study of self/identity. Theory & Psychology, 10(4), 527-546.
10. Crossley, M. L. (2000b). Introducing narrative psychology: Self, trauma, and the construction of meaning. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
11. Edley, N. (2001a). Analysing masculinity: Interpretative repertoires, subject positions and ideological dilemmas. In M. Wetherell, S. Taylor, & S. Yates (Eds.), Discourse as data: A guide for analysis (pp. 189-228). London: Sage.
12. Edley, N. (2001b). Conversation analysis, discursive psychology and the study of ideology: A response to Susan Speer. Feminism & Psychology, 11(1), 136-140.
13. Edwards, D. (1997). Discourse and cognition. London: Sage.
14. Edwards, D., & Potter, J. (1992). Discursive psychology. London: Sage.
15. Falmagne, R. J. (2001, June). On the constitution of ‘self’ and mind: Remarks on the dialectic of the system and the person. Paper presented at the Meeting of the International Society for Theoretical Psychology, Calgary
16. Gergen, K. J. (1997). Realities and relationships: Soundings in social construction Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
17. Horton-Salway, M. (2001). The construction of M.E: The discursive action model. In M. Wetherell, S. Taylor, & S. Yates (Eds.), Discourse as data: A guide for analysis (pp. 147-188). London: Sage.
18. Macnaghten, P., & Urry, J. (1998). Contested natures. London: Sage.
19. Potter, J., & Wetherell, M. (1987). Discourse and social psychology: Beyond attitudes and behaviour. London: Sage.
20. Schegloff, E. A. (1997). Whose text? Whose context? Discourse & Society, 8(2), 165-187.
21. Schegloff, E. A. (1998). Reply to Wetherell. Discourse & Society, 9(3), 413-416.
22. Shakespeare, P. (1998). Aspects of confused speech: A study of verbal interaction between confused and normal speakers. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
23. Speer, S. A. (2001a). Participants’ orientations, ideology and the ontological status of hegemonic masculinity: A rejoinder to Nigel Edley. Feminism & Psychology, 11(1), 141-144.
24. Speer, S. A. (2001b). Reconsidering the concept of hegemonic masculinity: discursive psychology, conversation analysis and participants’ orientations. Feminism & Psychology, 11(1), 107-135.
25. Taylor, S. (2001). Places I remember: Women’s talk about residence and other relationships to place. Auto/Biography, 9(1&2), 33-40.
26. Taylor, S., & Wetherell, M. (1999). A suitable time and place: Speakers’ use of ’time’ to do discursive work in narratives of nation and personal life. Time and Society, 5(1), 39-58.
27. Wetherell, M. (1998). Positioning and interpretative repertoires: Conversation analysis and post-structuralism in dialogue. Discourse & Society, 9(3), 387-412.
28. Wetherell, M., & Edley, N. (1998). Gender practices: Steps in the analysis of men and masculinities. In K. Henwood, C. Griffin, & A. Phoenix (Eds.), Standpoints and differences: Essays in the practice of feminist psychology (pp. 156-173). London: Sage.
29. Wooffitt, R. (2001). Researching psychic practitioners: Conversation analysis. In M. Wetherell, S. Taylor, & S. Yates (Eds.), Discourse as data: A guide for analysis (pp. 49-92). London: Sage.
30. Yngvesson, B., & Mahoney, M. A. (2000). ‘As one should, ought and wants to be’ - Belonging and authenticity in identity narratives. Theory, Culture & Society, 17(6), 77-110.