Stable isotope methods for high-precision proteomics

Drug Discovery Today

Volumn 10, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 353-363

  Schneider, Luke V ^a   Hall, Michael P ^a  

^a Target Discovery Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL MARKER; CYSTEINE; DEUTERIUM; ISOTOPE; LYSINE; MONOCLONAL ANTIBODY; PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN;

ACCURACY; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; DIGESTION; DRUG SCREENING; DRUG TRAFFIC; FOURIER TRANSFORM MASS SPECTROMETRY; FRAGMENTATION REACTION; HUMAN; IMMUNOASSAY; MASS FRAGMENTOGRAPHY; MASS SPECTROMETRY; MUTATION; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR ENERGY; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN DENATURATION; PROTEIN DETERMINATION; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN PHOSPHORYLATION; PROTEIN SYNTHESIS; PROTEOMICS; REVIEW; TANDEM MASS SPECTROMETRY; TECHNOLOGY; TOXICOLOGY; VALIDATION PROCESS;

ISOTOPE LABELING; MASS SPECTROMETRY; PROTEOMICS;

EID: 14644417774     PISSN: 13596446     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1359-6446(05)03381-7     Document Type: Review

References (59)

1. Gygi S.P., et al. Correlation between protein and mRNA abundance in yeast. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19:1999;1720-1730
2. Petricoin E.F., et al. Use of proteomic patterns in serum to identify ovarian cancer. Lancet. 359:2002;572-577
3. Steiner S., Anderson N.L. Expression profiling in toxicology - potentials and limitations. Toxicol. Lett. 112-113:2002;467-471
4. Frost, Sullivan. World in vitro Diagnostic Technologies Market. 2002;Frost & Sullivan. A116-53
5. Ingraham J.L., et al. Growth of the Bacterial Cell. 1983;Sinauer Associates
6. Anderson N.L., Anderson N.G. Proteome and proteomics: new technologies, new concepts, and new words. Electrophoresis. 19:1998;1853-1861
7. Corthais G.L., et al. The dynamic range of protein expression: a challenge for proteomic research. Electrophoresis. 21:2000;1104-1115
8. Kenyon G.L., et al. Defining the mandate of proteomics in the post-genomics era. Mol. Cell. Proteomics. 1:2002;763-780
9. Varnum S.M., et al. Proteomic characterization of nipple aspirate fluid: identification of potential biomarkers of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 80:2003;87-97
10. Sauter E.R., et al. Prostate specific antigen levels in nipple aspirate fluid correlate with breast cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 5:1996;967-970
11. Nedelkov D., et al. High-throughput comprehensive analysis of human plasma proteins: a step toward population proteomics. Anal. Chem. 76:2004;1733-1737
12. Nelson R.W., et al. Mass spectrometric immunoassay. Anal. Chem. 67:1995;1153-1158
13. Kiernan U.A., et al. Proteomic characterization of novel serum amyloid P component variants from human plasma and urine. Proteomics. 4:2004;1825-1829
14. Nedelkov D., Nelson R.W. Detection of staphylococcal enterotoxin B via biomolecular interaction analysis mass spectrometry. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69:2003;5212-5215
15. Kiernan U.A., et al. Detection of novel truncated forms of human serum amyloid A protein in human plasma. FEBS Lett. 537:2003;166-170
16. Nedelkov D., Nelson R.W. Surface plasmon resonance mass spectrometry: recent progress and outlooks. Trends Biotechnol. 21:2003;301-305
17. Nedelkov D., et al. Detection of bound and free IGF-1 and IGF-2 in human plasma via biomolecular interaction analysis mass spectrometry. FEBS Lett. 536:2003;130-134
18. Won Y., et al. Pattern analysis of serum proteome distinguishes renal cell carcinoma from other urologic diseases and healthy persons. Proteomics. 3:2003;2310-2316
19. Zhang R., et al. Controlling deuterium isotope effects in comparative proteomics. Anal. Chem. 74:2002;3662-3669
20. Wehr T. Affinity selection techniques for proteomic studies. LC/GC. 21:2003;274-284
21. Abrams S.A., Wong W.W. Stable Isotopes in Human Nutrition: Laboratory Methods and Research Applications. 2003;CABI Publishing
22. Schoenheimer R., Rittenberg D. Deuterium as an indicator in the study of intermediary metabolism. Science. 82:1935;156-157
23. Hellerstein M.K. Method for measuring in vivo synthesis of biopolymers. US Patent. 5:(338):Apr. 16 1994;686
24. Ong S.E., et al. Stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture, SILAC, as a simple and accurate approach to expression proteomics. Mol. Cell. Proteomics. 1:2002;376-386
25. Gygi S.P., et al. Quantitative analysis of complex protein mixtures using isotope-coded affinity tags. Nat. Biotechnol. 17:1999;994-999
26. Rose K., et al. A new mass-spectrometric C-terminal sequencing technique finds a similarity between γ-interferon and α2-interferon and identifies a proteolytically clipped γ-interferon that retains full antiviral activity. Biochem. J. 215:1983;273-277
27. 18O] Labeling Kit: Instruction Manual, Catalog # 271010 Rev. # 054001 (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA, 2004).
28. 18O-labeled internal standards. Rapid Comm. Mass Spectrom. 14:2000;1226-1232
29. Stewart I.I., et al. 18O labeling: A tool for proteomics. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 15:2001;2456-2465
30. Chakraborty A., Regnier F.E. Global internal standard technology for comparative proteomics. J. Chromatogr. A. 949:2002;173-178
31. Regnier, F.E. et al. Affinity selected signature peptides for protein identification and quantification. WO0186306 (Nov. 15, 2001).
32. Liu P., Regnier F.E. An isotope coding strategy for proteomics involving both amine and carboxy group labeling. J. Proteome Res. 1:2002;443-450
33. Zhang R., Regnier F.E. Minimizing resolution of isotopically coded peptides in comparative proteomics. J. Proteome Res. 1:2002;139-147
34. Regnier, F.E. and Zhang, R. Controlling isotope effects during fractionation of analytes. WO03027682 (Apr. 3, 2003).
35. nd Annual Meeting. Nashville, TN (May 24, 2004).
36. Peters E.C., Horn D. A novel multifunctional labeling reagent for enhanced protein characterization with mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 15:2001;2387-2392
37. Pappin, D.J.C. and Bartlet-Jones, M. Methods, mixtures, kits and compositions pertaining to analyte determination. WO 2004/070352 (Aug. 19, 2004).
38. Ren D., et al. Histidine-rich peptide selection and quantification in targeted proteomics. J. Proteome Res. 3:2004;37-45
39. Wang S., et al. Quantitative proteomics strategy involving the selection of peptides containing both cysteine and histidine from tryptic digests of cell lysates. J. Chromatogr. A. 949:2002;153-162
40. Aebersold, R.H.et al. Rapid quantitative analysis of proteins or protein function in complex mixtures. US6670194 (Dec. 30, 2003).
41. Han D.K., et al. Quanitative profiling of differentiation-induced microsomal proteins using isotope-coded affinity tags and mass spectrometry. Nat. Biotechnol. 19:2001;946-951
42. von Heller P.D., et al. The application of new software tools to quantitative protein profiling via isotope-coded affinity tag (ICAT) and tandem mass spectrometry: II. Evaluation of tandem mass spectrometry methodologies for large-scale protein analysis, and the application of statistical tools for data analysis and interpretation. Mol. Cell. Proteomics. 2:2003;428-442
43. 13C-isotope-coded affinity tag and multidimensional chromatography. Mol. Cell. Proteomics. 2:2003;299-314
44. Li J., et al. Protein profiling with cleavable isotope coded affinity tag (cICAT) reagents: the yeast salinity stress response. Mol. Cell. Proteomics. 2:2003;1198-1204
45. Zhang H., et al. Chemical probes and tandem mass spectrometry: a strategy for the quantitative analysis of proteomes and subproteomes. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 8:2004;66-75
46. Anderson N.L., Anderson N.G. The human plasma proteome: history, character, and diagnostic prospects. Mol. Cell. Proteomics. 1:2002;845-867
47. Halligan B.D., Dratz E. The Qcomp method for rapid peptide identification using qualitative amino acid composition and peptide mass, poster and presentation at the Keystone Symposia. Feb. 15 - 19, 2004;Mass Spectrometry in Systems Biology, Santa Fe, NM
48. Schneider, L.V.et al. Mass defect labeling for the determination of oligomer sequences. US20020172961 (Nov. 21, 2002).
49. Schneider L.V., et al. Mass-defect tagging for proteomic analysis. Genetic Eng. News. 24:2004;28-30
50. Hall M.P., Schneider L.V. Isotope differentiated binding energy shift tags (IDBEST™) for improved targeted biomarker discovery and validation. Expert Rev. Proteomics. 1:2004;1-11
51. Hall M.P., et al. 'Mass defect' tags for biomolecular mass spectrometry. J. Mass Spectrom. 38:2003;809-816
52. Whetstone P.A., et al. Element-coded affinity tags for peptides and proteins. Bioconjug. Chem. 15:2004;3-6
53. nd Ann. Mtg.Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom., Nashville, TN. (May 23-26, 2004).
54. Yates, J.R., III and Eng, J.K. Use of mass spectrometry fragmentation patterns of peptides to identify amino acid sequences in databases. US5538897 (July 23, 1996).
55. Mann M., Wilm M. Error-tolerant identification of peptides in sequence databases by peptide sequence tags. Anal. Chem. 66:1994;4390-4399
56. Kelleher N.L. Top-down proteomics. Anal. Chem. 76:2004;197A-203A
57. McLafferty F.W., et al. Two-dimensional mass spectrometry of biomolecules at the subfemtomole level. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2:1998;571-578
58. Schneider, L.V.et al. Methods for sequencing proteins. US6379971 (Apr. 30, 2002).
59. Krause, M. et al. Method and reagent for specifically identifying and quantifying one or more proteins in a sample, WO04001420 (Dec. 31, 2003).