|
Volumn 60, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 217-219
|
Editorial 2. Progress of the prudent patient: Consent after Chester v Afshar
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ANESTHESIA;
ANESTHESIST;
BLADDER FUNCTION;
CASE REPORT;
CAUDA EQUINA SYNDROME;
EDITORIAL;
HUMAN;
IMMOBILIZATION;
INFORMED CONSENT;
INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION;
INTERVERTEBRAL DISK HERNIA;
LAW;
LAW SUIT;
LOW BACK PAIN;
MEDICAL INFORMATION;
NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;
PATIENT RIGHT;
SURGEON;
SURGICAL RISK;
UNITED KINGDOM;
DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION;
LEGAL APPROACH;
LEGAL ASPECT;
LEGAL LIABILITY;
MEDICOLEGAL ASPECT;
PROFESSIONAL PATIENT RELATIONSHIP;
LEGAL APPROACH;
PROFESSIONAL PATIENT RELATIONSHIP;
DISCLOSURE;
GREAT BRITAIN;
HUMANS;
INFORMED CONSENT;
LEGISLATION, MEDICAL;
LIABILITY, LEGAL;
PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS;
|
EID: 14644412811
PISSN: 00032409
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2005.04150.x Document Type: Editorial |
Times cited : (10)
|
References (17)
|