Commentary: Patients may be less risk averse than committees

British Medical Journal

Volumn 330, Issue 7489, 2005, Pages 471-472

  Nurock, Shirley ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALZHEIMER DISEASE; DEMENTIA; FOLLOW UP; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HEALTH CARE; HUMAN; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL ETHICS; MEDICAL EXPERT; MEDICAL PRACTICE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MEDICAL STAFF; MORALITY; NOTE; PATIENT; PATIENT CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUALITY OF LIFE; RISK ASSESSMENT; SOCIAL CARE; STANDARD; WELLBEING; BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; ETHICS; MEDICAL AUDIT; RESEARCH ETHICS; RISK FACTOR;

BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;

BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; ETHICS, RESEARCH; HUMANS; MEDICAL AUDIT; RISK FACTORS;

EID: 14644408707     PISSN: 09598146     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Note

References (2)

1. Wade D. Ethics, audit, and research: all shades of grey. BMJ 2005;330:468-71.
2. Baldwin C, Hughes J, Hope T, Jacoby, R, Ziebland S. Ethics and dementia: the experience of family carers. Prog Neurol Psychiatry 2004;8(5). http://www.escriber.com/Progress/Features.asp?ID=170&Action=View (accessed 7 Feb 2004).