The effectiveness of metal on metal hip resurfacing: A systematic review of the available evidence published before 2002

BMC Health Services Research

Volumn 4, Issue , 2004, Pages

  Wyness, Laura ^a   Vale, Luke ^a,b   McCormack, Kirsty ^b   Grant, Adrian ^b   Brazzelli, Miriam ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

METAL;

COMPARATIVE STUDY; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HIP DISEASE; HIP OSTEOARTHRITIS; HUMAN; MEDICAL LITERATURE; METAL ON METAL HIP RESURFACING ARTHROPLASTY; REVIEW; SURGICAL PATIENT; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED KINGDOM; AGE; BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DEVICES; ECONOMICS; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HIP PROSTHESIS; OSTEOARTHRITIS, HIP; PROCEDURES;

AGE FACTORS; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; METALS; OSTEOARTHRITIS, HIP; TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, BIOMEDICAL; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 14644406926     PISSN: 14726963     EISSN: 14726963     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-4-39     Document Type: Review

References (23)

1. Northmore-Ball MD: Young Adults with Arthritic Hips. BMJ 1997, 315:265-266.
2. Fitzpatrick R, Shortall E, Sculpher M, Murray D, Morris R, Lodge M, Dawson J, Carr A, Britton A, Briggs A: Primary total hip replacement surgery: a systematic review of outcomes and modelling of cost effectiveness associated with different prostheses. Health Technol Assess 1998, 2(20):1-64.
3. Joshi AB, Porter ML, Trail IA, Hunt LP: Long term results of Charnley low friction arthroplasty in young patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1993, 75(4):616-623.
4. Department of Health: Hospital In-Patient Data [http://www.doh.gov.uk/ hes/standard_data/index.html]. (accessed 10-30-2001)
5. National Institute of Clinical Excellence: Appraisal of new and existing technologies: Interim guidance for manufacturers and sponsors. 1999 [http://server2.nice.org.uk/embcat2.asp?page=oldsite/appraisals/apr_gide.htm]. (accessed 10-30-2001)
6. The Royal Academy of Engineering: Joint replacement: once is forever. The Royal Academy of Engineering; 2000.
7. Frankel S, Eachus J, Pearson N, Greenwood R, Chan P, Peters T, Donovan J, Davey Smith G, Dieppe P: Population requirement for primary hip-replacement surgery: a cross-sectional study. Lancet 1999, 353:1304-1309.
8. National Institute of Clinical Excellence: The effectiveness and cost effectiveness of different prostheses for primary total hip replacement. [http://www.nice.org.uk]. (accessed 5-1-2001)
9. Amstutz HC: Arthroplasty options for advanced osteonecrosis. Orthopedics 2000, 23:927-928.
10. McMinn D, Treacy R, Lin K, Pynsent P: Metal on metal surface replacement of the hip. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 1996, 329S:89S-98S.
11. Schmalzried TP, Fowble VA, Ure KJ, Amstutz HC: Metal on metal surface replacement of the hip. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 1996, 329S:106S-114S.
12. Wagner M, Wagner H: Preliminary results of uncemented metal on metal stemmed and resurfacing hip arthroplasty. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 1996, 329S:78S-88S.
13. Faulkner A, Kennedy LG, Baxter K, Donovan J, Wilkinson M, Bevan G: Effectiveness of hip prostheses in primary total hip replacement: a critical review of evidence and an economical model. Health Technology Assessment 1998, 2(6):.
14. Sharp RJ, O'Leary ST, Falworth M, Cole A, Jones J, Marshall RW: Analysis of the results of the C-Fit uncemented total hip arthroplasty in young patients with hydroxyapatite or porous coating of components. Journal of Arthroplasty 2000, 15:627-634.
15. Cushnaghan J, Dieppe P: Study of 500 patients with limb joint osteoarthritis. Analysis by age, sex, and distribution of symptomatic joint sites. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 1991, 50:8.
16. Dieppe P, Cushnaghan J, Shepstone L: The Bristol 'OA500 study': progression of osteoarthritis (OA) over 3 years and the relationship between clinical and radiographic changes at the knee joint. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 1997, 5:87-97.
17. Dieppe P, Cushnaghan J, Tucker M, Browning S, Shepstone L: The Bristol 'OA500 study': progression and impact of the disease after 8 years. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 2000, 8:63.
18. Corin Group Ltd: Industry Submission 2001. In: Systematic review of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of metal on metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty for treatment of hip disease. Health Technology Assessment 2002, 6:15.
19. Midland Medical Technologies Ltd: Industry Submission 2001. In: Systematic review of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of metal on metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty for treatment of hip disease. Health Technology Assessment 2002, 6:15.
20. Oswestry Outcome Centre: Oswestry Outcome Centre, The Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic and District Hospital NHS Trust. In: Systematic review of the effectiveness and costeffectiveness of metal on metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty for treatment of hip disease. Health Technology Assessment 2002, 6:15.
21. Wright Cremascoli Ortho Ltd: Industry Submission 2001. In: Systematic review of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of metal on metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty for treatment of hip disease. Health Technology Assessment 2002, 6:15.
22. Swedish Hip Registry: Prognosis of Total Hip Replacement. 2000 [http://www.jru.orthop.gu.se].
23. Vale L, Wyness L, McCormack K, McKenzie L, Brazzelli M, Stearns SC: Systematic review of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of metal on metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty for treatment of hip disease. Health Technology Assessment 2002, 6:15.