Multiple herbicide-resistant canola can be controlled by alternative herbicides

Weed Science

Volumn 52, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 152-157

  Beckie, Hugh J ^a   Séguin Swartz, Ginette ^a   Nair, Harikumar ^a   Warwick, Suzanne I ^b   Johnson, Eric ^b  

^a SASKATOON RESEARCH CENTRE   (Canada)

^b AGRICULTURE AND AGRI FOOD CANADA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Gene stacking; Herbicide resistance; Pleiotropic effects; Volunteers

Indexed keywords

CANOLA; CULTIVAR; GENE EXPRESSION; GREENHOUSE ECOSYSTEM; HERBICIDE; PESTICIDE RESISTANCE; RESISTANCE MANAGEMENT;

BRASSICA NAPUS; BRASSICA NAPUS VAR. NAPUS;

EID: 14644400227     PISSN: 00431745     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1614/P2002-163     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Anonymous. 2003. Guide to Crop Protection 2003: Weeds, Plant Diseases, Insects. Regina, SK: Saskatchewan Agriculture, Food and Rural Revitalization; Winnipeg, MB: Manitoba Agriculture and Food. 354 p. [Biprovincial Publication]
2. Beckie, H. J., L. M. Hall, and S. I. Warwick. 2001. Impact of herbicide-resistant crops as weeds in Canada. Pages 135-142 in Proceedings of the Brighton Crop Protection Conference-Weeds. Farnham, Great Britain: British Crop Protection Council.
3. Beckie, H. J., S. I. Warwick, H. Nair, and G. Séguin-Swartz. 2003. Gene flow in commercial fields of herbicide-resistant canola (Brassica napus). J. Ecol. Appl. In press.
4. Canola Council of Canada. 2000. Final Report on Integrated Pest Management Practices in Canola. Winnipeg, MB: Canola Council of Canada. 124 p.
5. [CSGA] Canadian Seed Growers' Association. 2002. Regulations and Procedures for Pedigreed Seed Crop Inspection. Circular 6-94 (revised). www.seedgrowers.ca.
6. Devine, M. D. and J. L. Buth. 2001. Advantages of genetically modified canola: A Canadian perspective. Pages 367-372 in Proceedings of the Brighton Crop Protection Conference-Weeds. Farnham, Great Britain: British Crop Protection Council.
7. Downey, R. K. and H. J. Beckie. 2002. Isolation Effectiveness in Canola Pedigree Seed Production. Final Report to Canadian Seed Growers' Association. Saskatoon, SK, Canada: Saskatoon Research Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada. 14 p.
8. Friesen, L. F., A. G. Nelson, and R. C. Van Acker. 2003. Evidence of contamination of pedigreed canola (Brassica napus) seedlots in Western Canada with genetically engineered herbicide resistance traits. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 43:83.
9. Gomez, K. A. and A. A. Gomez. 1984. Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. 2nd ed. New York: J. Wiley. Pp. 421-422.
10. Gulden, R. H., S. J. Shirtliffe, and A. G. Thomas. 2002. Evidence of cyclical dormancy behaviour in spring B. napus. Pages 41-44 in D. Bernier, R. A. Campbell, and D. Cloutier, eds. Proceedings of the 2001 National Meeting of the Expert Committee on Weeds/Comité d'experts en malherbologie, Quebec City, QC, Canada. Sainte-Anne-de-Bellevue, Canada: ECW-CEM.
11. Gulden, R. H., S. J. Shirtliffe, and A. G. Thomas. 2003. Harvest losses of canola (Brassica napus) cause large seedbank inputs. Weed Sci. 51:83-86.
12. Hall, L., K. Topinka, J. Huffman, L. Davis, and A. Good. 2000. Pollen flow between herbicide-resistant Brassica napus is the cause of multiple-resistant B. napus volunteers. Weed Sci. 48:688-694.
13. Koutsoyiannis, A. 1977. Theory of Econometrics. 2nd ed. London, Great Britain: MacMillan Education. Pp. 81-91.
14. 2. Am. Stat. 39:279-285.
15. Ĺgère, A., M.-J. Simard, A. G. Thomas, D. Pageau, J. Lajeunesse, S. I. Warwick, and D. A. Derksen. 2001. Presence and persistence of volunteer canola in Canadian cropping systems. Brighton Crop Protection Conference-Weeds. Farnham, Great Britain: British Crop Protection Council. Pp. 143-148.
16. Lutman, P.J.W. and F. López-Granados. 1998. The persistence of seeds of oilseed rape (Brassica napus). Asp. Appl. Biol. 51:147-152.
17. Pekrun, C., J.D.J. Hewitt, and P.J.W. Lutman. 1998. Cultural control of volunteer oilseed rape (Brassica napus). J. Agric. Sci. 130:155-163.
18. Retzinger, E. J., Jr. and C. Mallory-Smith. 1997. Classification of herbicides by site of action for weed resistance management strategies. Weed Technol. 11:384-393.
19. [SAS] Statistical Analysis Systems. 1999. SAS/STAT User's Guide. Version 8. Cary, NC: Statistical Analysis Systems Institute. 1243 p.
20. Seefeldt, S. S., J. E. Jensen, and E. P. Fuerst. 1995. Log-logistic analysis of herbicide dose-response relationships. Weed Technol. 9:218-227.
21. Senior, I. J., C. Moyes, and P. J. Dale. 2002. Herbicide sensitivity of transgenic multiple herbicide-tolerant oilseed rape. Pest Manage. Sci. 58: 405-412.
22. Simard, M.-J. and A. Lég̀ere. 2003. Control of volunteer canola with auxinic herbicides. Does cold hardening or plant size matter? Page 166 in H. Beckie, N. Harker, E. Johnson, M. Lawton, A. Mulenga, T. Wolf, and D. Cloutier, eds. Proceedings of the 2002 National Meeting of Can. Weed Sci. Soc. Saskatoon, Canada: Can. Weed Sci. Soc.
23. Simard, M.-J., A. Légère, D. Pageau, J. Lajeunnesse, and S. Warwick. 2002. The frequency and persistence of volunteer canola (Brassica napus) in Québec cropping systems. Weed Technol. 16:433-439.
24. Simard, M.-J., A. Légère, G. Séguin-Swartz, H. Nair, and S. Warwick. 2003. Fitness of double (imidazolinone + glufosinate) vs single herbicide resistant canola (Brassica napus). Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 43: 75-76.
25. StatsCanada. 2001. November Estimate of Production of Principal Field Crops, Canada, 2001. Field Crop Reporting Series 80:8, Catalogue No. 22-002-XPB. Ottawa, Canada: Statistics Canada. 22 p.
26. Steel, G. D. and J. H. Torrie. 1980. Principles and Procedures of Statistics: A Biometrical Approach. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill. Pp. 471-472.
27. Thomas, P. 2001. You Can Control Multiple-Resistant Canola Volunteers. Canola Guide, April 2001. Winnipeg, MB, Canada: Farm Business Communications, www.agcanada.com.
28. Warwick, S. I., H. J. Beckie, and E. Small. 1999. Transgenic crops: new weed problems for Canada? Phytoprotection 80:71-84.
29. Warwick, S. I., M.-J. Simard, A. Légère, H. J. Beckie, L. Braun, B. Zhu, P. Mason, G. Séguin-Swartz, and C. N. Stewart, Jr. 2003. Hybridization between transgenic Brassica napus L. and its wild relatives: B. rapa L., Raphanus raphanistrum L., Sinapis arvensis L., and Erucastrum gallicum (Willd.) O.E. Schulz. Theor. Appl. Genet. 107:528-539.