Altered parcellation of neocortical somatosensory maps in N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor-deficient mice

Journal of Comparative Neurology

Volumn 485, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 57-63

  Lee, Li Jen ^a   Erzurumlu, Reha S ^a,b  

^a LOUISIANA STATE UNIV HLTH SCI C   (United States)

^b LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Barreloids; Barrels; Transgenic mice; Trigeminal system

Indexed keywords

N METHYL DEXTRO ASPARTIC ACID RECEPTOR;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BRAIN MAPPING; BRAIN REGION; BRAIN SIZE; BRAIN STEM; CONTROLLED STUDY; GENETIC MANIPULATION; KNOCKOUT MOUSE; MOUSE; MOUSE STRAIN; NEOCORTEX; NERVE CONDUCTION; NERVE PROJECTION; NEUROANATOMY; NONHUMAN; PARIETAL LOBE; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN FUNCTION; RECEPTOR DENSITY; SENSORY STIMULATION; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SOMATOSENSORY CORTEX; THALAMUS NUCLEUS; TRIGEMINAL NERVE; TRIGEMINAL NUCLEUS; WILD TYPE;

AFFERENT PATHWAYS; ANIMALS; ANIMALS, NEWBORN; BRAIN MAPPING; EXTREMITIES; MICE; MICE, KNOCKOUT; NEURONS; RECEPTORS, N-METHYL-D-ASPARTATE; SOMATOSENSORY CORTEX; THALAMUS; VIBRISSAE;

EID: 14644398107     PISSN: 00219967     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cne.20514     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Belford GR, Killackey HP. 1978. Anatomical correlates of the forelimb in the ventrobasal complex and the cuneate nucleus of the neonatal rat. Brain Res 158:450-455.
2. Bishop KM, Rubenstein JL, O'Leary DDM. 2002. Distinct actions of Emx1, Emx2, and Pax6 in regulating the specification of areas in the developing neocortex. J Neurosci 22:7627-7638.
3. Cline HT, Debski EA, Constantine-Paton M. 1987. N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist desegregates eye-specific stripes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 84:4325-4342.
4. Dawson DR, Killackey HP. 1987. The organization and mutability of the forepaw and hindpaw representations in the somatosensory cortex of the neonatal rat. J Comp Neurol 256:246-256.
5. Erzurumlu RS, Jhaveri S. 1990. Thalamic axons confer a blueprint of the sensory periphery onto the developing rat somatosensory cortex. Brain Res Dev Brain Res 56:229-234.
6. Erzurumlu RS, Jhaveri S. 1992a. Trigeminal ganglion cell processes are spatially ordered prior to the differentiation of the vibrissa pad. J Neurosci 12:3946-3955.
7. Erzurumlu RS, Jhaveri S. 1992b. Emergence of connectivity in the embryonic rat parietal cortex. Cereb Cortex 2:336-352.
8. Erzurumlu RS, Kind PC. 2001. Neural activity: sculptor of "barrels" in the neocortex. Trends Neurosci 24:589-595.
9. Erzurumlu RS, Jhaveri S, Benowitz LI. 1990. Transient patterns of GAP-43 expression during the formation of barrels in the rat somatosensory cortex. J Comp Neurol 292:443-456.
10. Fox K. 2002. Anatomical pathways and molecular mechanisms for plasticity in the barrel cortex. Neuroscience 111:799-814.
11. Fox K, Henley J, Isaac J. 1999. Experience-dependent development of NMDA receptor transmission. Nat Neurosci 2:279-299.
12. Fukuchi-Shimogori T, Groove EA. 2001. Neocortex patterning by the secreted signaling molecule FGF8. Science 294:1071-1074.
13. Garel S, Huffman KJ, Rubenstein JL. 2003. Molecular regionalization of the neocortex is disrupted in Fgf8 hypomorphic mutants. Development 130:1903-1914.
14. Grove EA, Fukuchi-Shimogori T. 2003. Generating the cerebral cortical area map. Annu Rev Neurosci 26:355-380.
15. Hahm JO, Langdon RB, Sur M. 1991. Disruption of retinogeniculate afferent segregation by antagonists to NMDA receptors. Nature 35:568-570.
16. Hevner RF, Shi L, Justice N, Hsueh Y, Sheng M, Smiga S, Bulfone A, Goffinet AM, Campagnoni AT, Rubenstein JL. 2001. Tbr1 regulates differentiation of the preplate and layer 6. Neuron 29:353-366.
17. Hevner RF, Miyashita-Lin E, Rubenstein JL. 2002. Cortical and thalamic axon pathfinding defects in Tbr1, Gbx2, and Pax6 mutant mice: evidence that cortical and thalamic axons interact and guide each other. J Comp Neurol 447:8-17.
18. Huntley GW, Benson DL. 1999. Neural (N)-cadherin at developing thalamocortical synapses provides an adhesion mechanism for the formation of somatopically organized connections. J Comp Neurol 407:453-471.
19. Iwasato T, Erzurumlu RS, Huerta PT, Chen DF, Sasaoka T, Ulupinar E, Tonegawa S. 1997. NMDA receptor-dependent refinement of somatotopic maps. Neuron 19:1201-1210.
20. Iwasato T, Datwani A, Wolf AM, Nishiyama H, Taguchi Y, Tonegawa S, Knop̈fel T, Erzurumlu RS, Itohara S. 2000. Cortex-restricted disruption of NMDAR1 impairs neuronal patterns in the barrel cortex. Nature 406:726-731.
21. Kaas JH. 2002. Sensory loss and cortical reorganization in mature primates. Prog Brain Res 138:167-176.
22. Kaas JH, Catania KC. 2002. How do features of sensory representations develop? Bioessays 24:334-343.
23. Killackey HP. 1973. Anatomical evidence for cortical subdivisions based on vertically discrete thalamic projections from the ventral posterior nucleus to cortical barrels in the rat. Brain Res 51:326-331.
24. Killackey HP, Rhoades RW, Bennett-Clarke CA. 1995. The formation of a cortical somatotopic map. Trends Neurosci 18:402-407.
25. Kutsuwada T, Sakimura K, Manabe T, Takayama C, Katakura N, Kushiya E, Natsume R, Watanabe M, Inoue Y, Yagi T, Aizawa S, Arakawa M, Takahashi T, Nakamura Y, Mori H, Mishina M. 1996. Impairment of suckling response, trigeminal neuronal pattern formation, and hippocampal LTD in NMDA receptor epsilon 2 subunit mutant mice. Neuron 16:333-344.
26. Li Y, Erzurumlu RS, Chen C, Jhaveri S, Tonegawa S. 1994. Whisker-related neuronal patterns fail to develop in the trigeminal brainstem nuclei of NMDAR1 knockout mice. Cell 76:427-437.
27. López-Bendito G, Molnár Z. 2003. Thalamocortical development: how are we going to get there? Nat Rev Neurosci 4:276-289.
28. Ma PM, Woolsey TA. 1984. Cytoarchitectonic correlates of the vibrissae in the medullary trigeminal complex of the mouse. Brain Res 306:374-379.
29. Maier DL, Mani S, Donovan SL, Soppet D, Tessarollo L, McCasland JS, Meiri KF. 1999. Disrupted cortical map and absence of cortical barrels in growth-associated protein (GAP)-43 knockout mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96:9397-9402.
30. Mann F, Ray S, Harris W, Holt C. 2002. Topographic mappings in dorsoventral axis of the Xenopus retinotectal system depends on signaling through ephrin-B ligands. Neuron 35:461-473.
31. O'Leary DDM, Ruff NL, Dyck RH. 1994. Development, critical period plasticity, and adult reorganizations of mammalian somatosensory systems. Curr Opin Neurobiol 4:535-544.
32. Poskanzer K, Needleman LA, Bozdagi O, Huntley GW. 2003. N-cadherin regulates ingrowth and laminar targeting of thalamocortical axons. J Neurosci 23:2294-2305.
33. Prakash N, Vanderhaeghen P, Cohen-Cory S, Frisen J, Flanagan JG, Frostig RD. 2000. Malformation of the functional organization of somatosensory cortex in adult ephrin-A5 knock-out mice revealed by in vivo functional imaging. J Neurosci 20:5841-5847.
34. Ragsdale CW, Groove E. 2001. Patterning the mammalian cerebral cortex. Curr Opin Neurobiol 11:50-58.
35. Rakic P. 2001. Neurobiology. Neurocreationism - making new cortical maps. Science 294:1011-1012.
36. Rakic P. 2002. Evolving concepts of cortical radial and areal specification. Prog Brain Res 136:265-280.
37. Rauschecker JP. 2002. Cortical map plasticity in animals and humans. Prog Brain Res 138:73-88.
38. Riddle DR, Purves D. 1995. Individual variation and lateral asymmetry of the rat primary somatosensory cortex. J Neurosci 15:4184-4195.
39. Senft SL, Woolsey TA. 1991. Growth of thalamic afferents into mouse barrel cortex. Cereb Cortex 1:308-335.
40. Sestan N, Rakic P, Donoghue MJ. 2001. Independent parcellation of the embryonic visual cortex and thalamus revealed by combinatorial Eph/ ephrin gene expression. Curr Biol 11:39-43.
41. Simon DK, Prusky GT, O'Leary DDM, Constantine-Paton M. 1992. N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonists disrupt the formation of a mammalian neural map. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 89:10593-10597.
42. Van der Loos H. 1976. Barreloids in mouse somatosensory thalamus. Neurosci Lett 2:1-6.
43. Vanderhaeghen P, Lu Q, Prakash N, Frisen J, Walsh CA, Frostig RD, Flanagan JG. 2000. Mapping label required for normal scale of body representation in the cortex. Nat Neurosci 3:358-365.
44. Wall JT, Xu J, Wang X. 2002. Human brain plasticity: an emerging view of the multiple substrates and mechanisms that cause cortical changes and related sensory dysfunctions after injuries of sensory inputs from the body. Brain Res Rev 39:181-215.
45. Welker E, Van der Loos H. 1986. Quantitative correlation between barrel-field size and the sensory innervation of the whiskerpad: a comparative study in six strains of mice bred for different patterns of mystacial vibrissae. J Neurosci 6:3355-3373.
46. Woolsey TA. 1990. Peripheral alteration and somatosensory development. In: Coleman EJ, editor. Development of sensory systems in mammals. New York: Wiley. p 461-516.
47. Woolsey TA, Van der Loos H. 1970. The structural organization of layer IV in the somatosensory region (SI) of mouse cerebral cortex. The description of a cortical field composed of discrete cytoarchitectonic units. Brain Res 17:205-242.
48. Yun ME, Johnson RR, Antic A, Donoghue MJ. 2003. EphA family gene expression in the developing mouse neocortex: regional patterns reveal intrinsic programs and extrinsic influence. J Comp Neurol 456:203-216.