메뉴 건너뛰기
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery
Volumn 125, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 70-72
Randomization and concealment in surgical trials: A comparison between orthopaedic and non-orthopaedic randomized trials
Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]
Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY; CLINICAL STUDY; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONSENSUS; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; GENERAL SURGERY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MULTICENTER STUDY; NEUROSURGERY; ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY; PLASTIC SURGERY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; PUBLISHING; QUALITY CONTROL; RANDOMIZATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; SURGICAL PATIENT; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; THORAX SURGERY; VASCULAR SURGERY;
EID: 14544298470     PISSN: 09368051     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00402-004-0762-6     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (11)
References (8)
  • 1
    • 0036512461 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The quality of reporting of randomized trials in The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery from 1988 through 2000
    • 10.1302/0301-620X.84B7.12532
    • Bhandari M, Richards RR, Sprague S, Schemitsch EH (2002) The quality of reporting of randomized trials in The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery from 1988 through 2000. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84:388-396 10.1302/ 0301-620X.84B7.12532
    • (2002) J Bone Joint Surg Am , vol.84 , pp. 388-396
    • Bhandari, M.1    Richards, R.R.2    Sprague, S.3    Schemitsch, E.H.4
  • 2
    • 0003522255 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • (eds) (updated March 2003). The Cochrane Library, issue 2. Update Software, Oxford
    • Clarke M, Oxman AD (eds) (2003) Cochrane reviewers' handbook 4.2.0 (updated March 2003). In: The Cochrane Library, issue 2. Update Software, Oxford
    • (2003) Cochrane Reviewers' Handbook 4.2.0
    • Clarke, M.1    Oxman, A.D.2
  • 3
    • 0032585188 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The unpredictability paradox: Review of empirical comparisons of randomized and non-randomised clinical trials
    • 9794851
    • Kinz R, Oxman AD (1998) The unpredictability paradox: Review of empirical comparisons of randomized and non-randomised clinical trials. BMJ 317:1185-1190
    • (1998) BMJ , vol.317 , pp. 1185-1190
    • Kinz, R.1    Oxman, A.D.2
  • 4
    • 0032558314 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Does the quality of reports of randomized trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?
    • 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)01085-X
    • Moher D, Pham B, Jones A, Cook DJ, Jadad AR, Moher M, Tugwell P, Klassen TP (1998) Does the quality of reports of randomized trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? Lancet 352:609-613 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)01085-X
    • (1998) Lancet , vol.352 , pp. 609-613
    • Moher, D.1    Pham, B.2    Jones, A.3    Cook, D.J.4    Jadad, A.R.5    Moher, M.6    Tugwell, P.7    Klassen, T.P.8
  • 5
    • 0032494764 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Randomisation methods in controlled trials
    • 1:STN:280:DyaK1M%2Fitlylug%3D%3D
    • Roberts C, Torgerson D (1998) Randomisation methods in controlled trials. BMJ 317:1301-1310 1:STN:280:DyaK1M%2Fitlylug%3D%3D
    • (1998) BMJ , vol.317 , pp. 1301-1310
    • Roberts, C.1    Torgerson, D.2
  • 6
    • 0030608236 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Randomized trials, human nature, and reporting guidelines
    • 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)01201-9
    • Schulz KF (1996) Randomized trials, human nature, and reporting guidelines. Lancet 348:596-598 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)01201-9
    • (1996) Lancet , vol.348 , pp. 596-598
    • Schulz, K.F.1
  • 7
    • 0028849245 scopus 로고
    • Subverting randomization in controlled trials
    • 10.1001/jama.274.18.1456
    • Schulz KF (1995) Subverting randomization in controlled trials. JAMA 274:1456-1458 10.1001/jama.274.18.1456
    • (1995) JAMA , vol.274 , pp. 1456-01458
    • Schulz, K.F.1
  • 8
    • 85047692188 scopus 로고
    • Empirical evidence of bias: Dimension of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials
    • Schulz K.F. Chalmers I. Hayes R.J. Altman D.J. 1995 Empirical evidence of bias: Dimension of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials JAMA 273 408-412
    • (1995) JAMA , vol.273 , pp. 408-412
    • Schulz, K.F.1    Chalmers, I.2    Hayes, R.J.3    Altman, D.J.4

* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.