Coulomb-U and magnetic-moment collapse in δ-Pu

Europhysics Letters

Volumn 69, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 588-594

  Shick, A B ^a   Drchal, V ^a   Havela, L ^b  

^a INSTITUTE OF PHYSICS   (Czech Republic)

^b CHARLES UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 14544290004     PISSN: 02955075     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1209/epl/i2004-10380-5     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. HECKER S. S., HARBUR D. R. and Zocco T. G., Prag. Mater. Sci., 49 (2004) 429.
2. DORMEVAL M., BACLET N., VALOT C., ROFIDAL P. and FOURNIER J. M., J. Alloys Comp., 350 (2003) 86.
3. FRADIN F. Y. and BRODSKY M. B., Int. J. Magn., l (1970) 1.
4. CURRO N. J. and MORALES L., arXiv:cond-mat/0404626 (2004).
5. LASHLEY J. C., LAWSON A., MCQUEENEY R. J. and LANDER G. H., arXiv:cond-mat/0410634 (2004).
6. SOLOVYEV I. V., LIECHTENSTEIN A. I., GUBANOV V. A., ANTROPOV V. P. and ANDERSEN O. K., Phys. Rev. B, 43 (1991) 14414.
7. SÖDERLIND P. and SADIGH B., Phys. Rev. Lett., 92 (2004) 185702.
8. ERIKSSON O., BECKER J. D., BALATSKY A. V. and WILLS J. M., J. Alloys Comp., 287 (1999) 1.
9. SAVRASOV S. Y., KOTLIAR G. and ABRAHAMS E., Nature, 410 (2001) 793.
10. BOUCHET J., SIBERCHICOT B., JOLLET F. and PASTUREL A., J. Phys. Condens. Matter, 12 (2000) 1723.
11. SAVRASOV S. Y. and KOTLIAR G., Phys. Rev. Lett., 84 (2000) 3670.
12. ANISIMOV V. L, ZAANEN J. and ANDERSEN O. K., Phys. Rev. B, 44 (1991) 943. The LDA+U method can be regarded as the Hartree-Fock limit of the LSDA combined with the dynamical mean-field theory (LSDA+DMFT) [9].
13. ANISIMOV V. L, ZAANEN J. and ANDERSEN O. K., Phys. Rev. B, 44 (1991) 943. The LDA+U method can be regarded as the Hartree-Fock limit of the LSDA combined with the dynamical mean-field theory (LSDA+DMFT) [9].
14. PETUKHOV A. G., MAZIN I. I., CHIONCEL L. and LIECHTENSTEIN A. I., Phys. Rev. B, 67 (2003) 153106.
15. LIECHTENSTEIN A. I., ANISIMOV V. I. and ZAANEN J., Phys. Rev. B, 52 (1995) R5467.
16. CZYZYK M. T. and SAWATZKY G. A., Phys. Rev. B, 49 (1994) 14211.
17. SHICK A. B. and PICKETT W. E., Phys. Rev. Lett., 86 (2001) 300; SHICK A. B., LIECHTENSTEIN A. I. and PICKETT W. E., Phys. Rev. B, 60 (1999) 10763.
18. SHICK A. B. and PICKETT W. E., Phys. Rev. Lett., 86 (2001) 300; SHICK A. B., LIECHTENSTEIN A. I. and PICKETT W. E., Phys. Rev. B, 60 (1999) 10763.
19. KATSNELSON M. I., SOLOVYEV I. V. and TREFILOV A. V., JETP Lett., 56 (1992) 272.
20. SÖDERLIND P., Europhys. Lett., 55 (2001) 525.
21. We note that our FLL-LDA+U results with assumed AFM order differ somewhat from those previously reported in refs. [10,11] which were obtained on the basis of linear-muffin-tin orbitals (FP-LMTO) assuming a ferromagnetic order. It is also to be said that the results of [10] and [11] differ from each other, in spite of the use of the same FP-LMTO package of S. Savrasov [11].
22. LEDBETTER H. M. and MOMENT R. L., Acta Metall, 24 (1976) 891.
23. GOUDER T., HAVELA L., WASTIN F. and REBIZANT J., Europhys. Lett., 55 (2001) 705.
24. HAVELA L., WASTIN F., REBIZANT J. and GOUDER T., Phys. Rev. B, 68 (2003) 085101.
25. ARKO A. J., JOYCE J. J., MORALES L., WILLS J., LASHLEY J., WASTIN F. and REBIZANT J., Phys. Rev. B, 62 (2000) 1773.
26. HAVELA L., GOUDER T., WASTIN F. and REBIZANT J., Phys. Rev. B, 65 (2002) 235118.
27. TERRY J. et al., Surf. Sci., 499 (2002) L141.
28. GOUDER T., WASTIN F., REBIZANT J. and HAVELA L., Phys. Rev. Lett., 84 (2000) 3378.
29. GERKEN F. and SCHMIDT-MAY J., J. Phys. F, 13 (1983) 1571.
30. GUNNARSON O. and SCHöNHAMMER K., Phys. Rev. B, 28 (1983) 4315.