How to explain oppression criteria of adequacy for normative explanatory theories

Philosophy of the Social Sciences

Volumn 35, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 20-49

  Cudd, Ann E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

Author keywords

Explanation; Oppression; Rational choice theory

Indexed keywords

EID: 14544286889     PISSN: 00483931     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0048393104271923     Document Type: Review

References (29)

1. Bales, Kevin. 1999. Disposable people. Berkeley: University of California Press.
2. Baumol, William J. 1965. Welfare economics and the theory of the state. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3. Cudd, Ann E. 1994. Oppression by choice. Journal of Social Philosophy 25:22-24.
4. -. 2001. Non-voluntary social groups. In Group and group rights, ed. Larry May and Leslie Francis. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
5. -. Forthcoming. Analyzing oppression. New York: Oxford University Press.
6. Duhem, Pierre. 1954. Aim and structure of physical theory. Trans. Philip P. Wiener. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
7. Dupré, John. 1993. The disorder of things. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8. Elster, Jon. 1983a. Explaining technical change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9. -. 1983b. Sour grapes: Studies in the subversion of rationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10. Flax, Jane. 1981. Psychoanalysis and the philosophy of science: Critique or resistance? journal of Philosophy 78:561-69.
11. Hempel, Carl G. 1983. Valuation and objectivity in science. In Physics, philosophy, and psychoanalysis, ed. Robert Cohen. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Reidel.
12. Hobbes, Thomas. 1968. Leviathan. Ed. C. B. Macpherson. Middlesex, UK: Penguin.
13. Honneth, Axel. 1995. The struggle for recognition. Trans. Joel Anderson. Cambridge, MA: Polity.
14. Jackson, Frank, and Philip Petit. 1992. In defense of explanatory ecumenism. Economics and Philosophy 8:1-22.
15. Kitcher, Philip. 1985. Vaulting ambition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
16. -. 2001. Science, truth, and democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.
17. Longino, Helen E. 1990. Science as social knowledge: Values and objectivity in scientific inquiry. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
18. Mäki, Uskali. 2002. Explanatory ecumenism and economic imperialism. Economics and Philosophy 18:235-57.
19. Moody-Adams, Michele. 1997. Fieldwork in familiar places. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
20. Nelson, Lynn Hankinson. 2003. The descent of evolutionary explanations: Darwinian vestiges in the social sciences. In Blackwell guide to philosophy of the social sciences, ed. Stephen P. Turner and Paul A. Ruth. Maiden, MA: Blackwell.
21. Obiora, Leslye, and Cheryl Johnson-Odim. 1994. African female circumcision: Two academic views. In African Newbreed, April.
22. Quine, W. V. Q. 1961. From a logical point of view. 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
23. Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. 1987. Basic political writings. Trans. Donald Cress. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.
24. Salmon, Merrilee. 1997. Ethical considerations in anthropology and archeology, or Relativism and justice for all. Journal of Anthropological Research 53:47-63.
25. Satz, Debra, and John Ferejohn. 1994. Rational choice and social theory, Journal of Philosophy 91:71-87.
26. Sellars, Wilfrid. 1963. Science, perception and reality. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul/New York: Humanities Press.
27. Sidanius, Jim, and Felicia Pratto. 1999. Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28. van Fraassen, Bas. 1980. The scientific image. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
29. Willett, Cynthia. 1995. Maternal ethics and other slave moralities. New York: Routledge.