Lessons learned in designing research methodology in field-based construction research

Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice

Volumn 130, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 109-114

  El Diraby, Tamer E ^a   O'Connor, James T ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

Construction management; Model verification; Research needs; Validation

Indexed keywords

CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT; MODEL VERIFICATION; RESEARCH NEEDS; VALIDATION;

ACCIDENT PREVENTION; BRIDGES; BUDGET CONTROL; CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY; DATA ACQUISITION; ENGINEERING RESEARCH; HIGHWAY PLANNING; HIGHWAY SYSTEMS; MODEL STRUCTURES; STATISTICAL METHODS;

STRUCTURAL DESIGN;

EID: 14544284514     PISSN: 10523928     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(2004)130:2(109)     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Acroyed, S., and Hughes, J. (1992). Data collection in context, Long-man's, London.
2. Black, T. R. (1993). Evaluating social science research: An introduction, Sage, Thousand Oaks, Calif.
3. Calder, B. J., Phillips, L. W., and Tybout, A. M. (1983). "Beyond external validity." J. Consum. Res., 10(1).
4. Cook, T. D., and Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation - Design and analysis issues for field settings, Rand McNally College, Chicago.
5. El-Diraby, T. E., and O'Connor, J. T. (2001). "Model for evaluating bridge construction plans." J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 127(5), 399-405.
6. Yoon, K. P., and Hwang, C. L. (1995). Multiple attribute decision making: An introduction, Sage, Thousand Oaks, Calif.