Erratum: The merits of blastocyst versus cleavage stage embryo transfer: A Cochrane review (Human Reproduction (2004) vol. 19 (795-807))

Human Reproduction

Volumn 19, Issue 9, 2004, Pages 2174-

  Blake, Debbie A ^a,b   Proctor, Michelle ^a,c   Johnson, Neil P ^a,c,d  

^a NATIONAL WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (New Zealand)

^b AUCKLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (New Zealand)

^c UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

^d Fertility Plus   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ERRATUM; ERROR; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; EMBRYO TRANSFER; FEMALE; HUMAN; LETTER; LITERATURE; META ANALYSIS; MULTIPLE PREGNANCY; OOCYTE CLEAVAGE; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PREGNANCY RATE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; STANDARD;

CLEAVAGE STAGE, OVUM; EMBRYO TRANSFER; FEMALE; HUMANS; META-ANALYSIS; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PREGNANCY RATE; PREGNANCY, MULTIPLE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS; REVIEW LITERATURE;

EID: 14544283581     PISSN: 02681161     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deh480     Document Type: Erratum

References (3)

1. Blake DA, Proctor M and Johnson NP (2004) The merits of blastocyst versus cleavage stage embryo transfer: a Cochrane review. Hum Reprod 19, 795-807.
2. Frattarelli JL, Leondires MP, McKeeby JL, Miller BT, and Segars JH (2003) Blastocyst transfer decreases multiple pregnancy rates in in vitro fertilization cycles: a randomized controlled trial. Fertil Steril 79,228-229.
3. Blake D, Proctor M, Johnson N and Olive D (2003) Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted conception (Cochrane Review). The Cochrane Library Issue 3, Oxford Update Software.