Detecting and classifying delay data exceptions on communication networks using rule based algorithms

International Journal of Communication Systems

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 159-177

  Benmusa, Tammam ^a   Parish, David J ^a   Sandford, Mark ^a  

^a LOUGHBOROUGH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Changes in network performance; Communication network measurement; Communication network performance; Data Exceptions; Rule based detection

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION); ERROR ANALYSIS; SIGNAL DETECTION; TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES;

CHANGES IN NETWORK PERFORMANCE; COMMUNICATION NETWORK MEASUREMENT; COMMUNICATION NETWORK PERFORMANCE; DATA EXCEPTIONS; RULE BASED DETECTION;

TELECOMMUNICATION NETWORKS;

EID: 14544281525     PISSN: 10745351     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/dac.694     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Sandford M. Detecting changes in network performance from low level measurements. Ph.D. Thesis, Loughborough University, 2001.
2. Chen TM. Network traffic measurements and experiments. Guest Editorial IEEE Communications Magazine, May 2000; 120.
3. Claffy KC. But some data is worse than others. Measurement of the Global Internet, 1996, http://www.caida.org/outreach/papers/1996/telegeog96/telegeog96. xml.
4. Sandford M, Parish D, Philips I. Neural approach to detecting communication network events. IEE Proceedings Communication 2002; 149(5):2002.
5. Mcgregr T, Braun HW. Automated event detection for active measurement system. Passive and Active Measurements, PAM 2001, April 2001, Amsterdam.
6. Phillips IW et al. SMDS network performance measurement. IEE Colloquium on Practical Experience with SMDS, October 1995; 7.1-7.4.
7. Neave HR, Worthington PL. Distribution - Free Test. Unwin Hyman: London, UK, 1988.
8. Manikopoulos C, Papavassiliou S. Network intrusion and fault detection: a statistical anomaly approach. IEEE Communications Magazine, October 2002; 76-82.
9. Huang P, Feldmann A, Willinger W. A non-intrusive, wavelet-based approach to detecting network performance problems. ACM SIGCOMM Internet Measurement Workshop, 2001; 15.
10. Ho L, Cavuto DJ, Papavassiliou S, Zawadzki AG. Adaptive and automated detection of service anomalies in transaction-oriented WANs: network analysis, algorithms, implementation, and deployment. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications 2000; 18(5).
11. Barford P, Kline J, Plonka D, Ron A. A signal analysis of network traffic anomalies. Proceedings of ACM SIGCOMM Internet Measurement Workshop, Marseilles, France, November 2002.
12. Barford P, Plonka D. Characteristics of network traffic flow anomalies. Proceedings of ACM SIGCOMM Internet Measurement Workshop, San Francisco, CA, November 2001.
13. Brutlag J. Aberrant behavior detection in time series for network monitoring. Proceedings of the USENIX Fourteenth System Administration Conference LISA XIV, New Orleans, LA, December 2000.
14. http://watt.nlanr.net/AMP/
15. Phillips IW et al. On the monitoring and measurement of quality of service of superJanet. 13th UK Teletraffic Symposium IEE, March 1996; 16/1-16/9.
16. Talpade RR, Kim G, Khurana S. NOMAD: traffic-based network monitoring framework for anomaly detection. The Fourth IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications, Red Sea, Egypt, July 1999.