Response modeling methodology validating evidence from engineering and the sciences

Quality and Reliability Engineering International

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 61-79

  Shore, Haim ^a  

^a BEN GURION UNIVERSITY OF THE NEGEV   (Israel)

Author keywords

Generalized linear modeling; Quality improvement; Transformations; Variation modeling

Indexed keywords

LINEAR EQUATIONS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATION; NORMAL DISTRIBUTION; PRODUCTION ENGINEERING; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

GENERALIZED LINEAR MODELING; QUALITY IMPROVEMENT; RESPONSE MODELING METHOD; VARIATION MODELING;

QUALITY ASSURANCE;

EID: 1442357742     PISSN: 07488017     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/qre.547     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Shore H. Modeling a non-normal response for quality improvement. International Journal of Production Research 2001; 39(17):4049-4063.
2. Shore H. Modeling a response with self-generated and externally generated sources of variation. Quality Engineering 2002; 14(4):563-578.
3. Shore H. General control charts for attributes. IIE Transactions 2000; 32:1149-1160.
4. Lewis SL, Montgomery DC, Myers RH. Confidence interval coverage for designated experiments analyzed with GLMs. Journal of Quality Technology 2001; 33:279-292.
5. Myers RH, Montgomery DC. A tutorial on generalized linear models. Journal of Quality Technology 1997; 29(3):274-291.
6. Hamada M, Nelder JA. Generalized linear models for quality-improvement experiments. Journal of Quality Technology 1997; 29(3):292-304.
7. Myers RH, Montgomery DC, Vining GG. Generalized Linear Models, with Applications in Engineering and the Sciences. Wiley: New York, 2002.
8. Shore H, Brauner N, Shacham M. Modeling physical and thermodynamic properties via inverse normalizing transformations. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research 2002; 41:651-656.
9. Shore H. Three approaches to analyze quality data originating in non-normal populations. Quality Engineering 2000; 13(3):277-291.
10. Shore H. Inverse normalizing transformations and a normalizing transformation. Advances in Methodological and Applied Aspects of Probability and Statistics, vol. 2, Balakrishnan N (ed.). Gordon and Breach Science 2001; 131-146.
11. Shore H. General control charts for variables. International Journal of Production Research 2000; 38(8):1875-1897.
12. Shore H. Response Modeling Methodology (RMM)-exploring the properties of the implied error-distribution. Communications in Statistics (Theory and Methods) 2002; 31(12):2225-2249.
13. Daubert TE. Evaluated equations forms for correlating thermodynamic and transport properties with temperature. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research 1998; 37(8):3260-3267.
14. Halliday D, Resnick R, Walker J. Fundamentals of Physics, Extended, with Modern Physics (4th edn). Wiley: New York, 1993.
15. Antoine C. Thermodynamic vapor pressures: New relation between the pressures and the temperatures (Thermodynamique, Tensions des Vapeurs: Novelle Relation enter les Tensions et les Temperatures), C.R. Hebd. Seances Acad. Sci. 1888; 107:681, 836, 1146.
16. Clapeyron EJ. Memoirs on the motive power of heat. L'ecole Polytechnique 1834; 14(23):153.
17. Riedel L. A new universal formula for vapor pressure (Eine Neue Universelle Dampfdrukformel). Chem. Ing. Tech 1954; 26:83.
18. Guggenheim EA. The principle of corresponding states. Journal of Chemical Physics 1945; 13:253.
19. Rackett HG. Equation of state for saturated liquids. Journal of Chemical and Engineering Data 1970; 15(4):514-517.
20. 18 1-Alkanols. Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data 1990; 19(3):719-762.
21. Benedek GB, Villars FMH. Physics with Illustrative Examples from Medicine and Biology-Statistical Physics (2nd edn). Springer: New York, 2000.
22. Schroeder M. Fractals, Chaos, Power Laws. W H Freeman and Company, 1991.
23. Goel AL, Okumoto K. Time-dependent error-detection rate model for software reliability and other performance measures. IEEE Transactions on Reliability 1979; 28:206-211.
24. Yamada S, Osaki S. Nonhomogenous error detection rate models for software reliability growth. Stochastic Models in Reliability Theory. Springer: Berlin, 1984; 120-143.
25. Musa JD, Iannino A, Okumoto K. Software Reliability-Measurement, Prediction, Application. McGraw-Hill: New York, 1987.
26. Duane JT. Learning curve approach to reliability monitoring. IEEE Transactions 1964; 2:563-566.
27. Xie M, Zhao M. On some reliability growth models with simple graphical interpretations. Microelectronics and Reliability 1993; 3(2):149-167.
28. Knafl GJ, Morgan J. Solving ML equations for 2-parameter Poisson-process models for ungrouped software-failure data. IEEE Transactions on Reliability 1996; 48:159-168.
29. Arnoux F, Gaudoin O, Makni C. The generalized power family in software reliability data analysis. MMR'2000: Second International Conference on Mathematical Methods in Reliability-Abstracts' Book, vol. 1. 2000; 107-110.
30. Musa JD, Software Reliability Data. Technical Report, Rome Air Development Center, 1979.
31. Xie M. Software reliability models-past, present and future. Recent Advances in Reliability Theory-Methodology, Practice and Inference (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 1845), Limnios N, Nikulin M (eds.). Birkhauser: Boston, MA, 2000; 325-340.