Growth modification of the rabbit mandible using therapeutic ultrasound: Is it possible to enhance functional appliance results?

Angle Orthodontist

Volumn 73, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 631-639

  El Bialy, Tarek ^a,b   El Shamy, Iman ^c   Graber, Thomas M ^d  

^a TANTA UNIVERSITY   (Egypt)

^b KING ABDULAZIZ UNIVERSITY   (Saudi Arabia)

^c Tanta University   (Egypt)

^d Department of Orthodontics   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ANTHROPOMETRY; ARTICLE; BONE GROWTH; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENCHONDRAL OSSIFICATION; HISTOLOGY; MALE; MANDIBLE; NONHUMAN; RABBIT; ULTRASOUND THERAPY; ANIMAL; ANIMAL MODEL; BONE REMODELING; CARTILAGE; CARTILAGE CELL; CEPHALOMETRY; GROWTH PLATE; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; MANDIBLE CONDYLE; MULTIMODALITY CANCER THERAPY; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE; OSTEOBLAST; PATHOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY;

COLORING AGENT; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT;

ANIMALS; BONE REMODELING; CARTILAGE; CEPHALOMETRY; CHONDROCYTES; COLORING AGENTS; COMBINED MODALITY THERAPY; GROWTH PLATE; MALE; MANDIBLE; MANDIBULAR CONDYLE; MODELS, ANIMAL; ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCES, FUNCTIONAL; OSTEOBLASTS; RABBITS; ULTRASONIC THERAPY;

EID: 1442356502     PISSN: 00033219     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. McNamara JA. Components of Class II malocclusion in children 8-10 years of age. Angle Orthod. 1981;51:177-202.
2. Graber TM, Rakosi T, Petrovic AC. Dentofacial Orthopedic With Functional Appliances, 2nd ed. Mosby -Year Book; 1997:19:421.
3. Epker NB, Fish LC. The surgical-orthodontic correction of mandibular deficiency. Part I. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1983;106:408-421.
4. Proffit WR, White RP Jr. Who needs surgical-orthodontic treatment? Int J Adult Ortho Orthognath Surg. 1990;5:81-89.
5. Baume LJ, Derichsweiler H. Is the condylar growth center responsive to orthodontic therapy? An experimental study in Macaca mulatta. Oral Surg. 1961;14:347-362.
6. Charlier JP, Petrovic A, Herrmann-Stutzmann J. Effects of mandibular hyperpropulsion on the prechondroblastic zone of young rat condyle. Am J Orthod. 1969;55:71-74.
7. Petrovic A. Mechanisms and regulation of mandibular condylar growth. Acta Morphol Neerl-Scand. 1972;10:25-34.
8. Petrovic A, Stutzmann JJ, Oudet CL. Control processes in the postnatal growth of the condylar cartilage of the mandible. In: McNamara JA Jr., ed. Determinants of Mandibular Form and Growth. Monograph No. 4, Craniofacial Growth Series. Ann Arbor, Mich: Center for Human Growth and Development, The University of Michigan; 1975:101-154.
9. Petrovic A, Stutzmann J, Gasson N. The final length of the mandible: is it genetically predetermined? In: Carlson DS, ed. Craniofacial Biology. Monograph No. 10, Craniofacial Growth Series. Ann Arbor, Mich: Center for Human Growth and Development, The University of Michigan; 1981:105-126.
10. Stöckli PW, Willert HG. Tissue reactions in the temporomandibular joint resulting from anterior displacement of the mandible in the monkey. Am J Orthod. 1971;60:142-155.
11. Adams CD, Meikle MC, Norwick KW, Turpin DI. Dentofacial remodeling produced by intermaxillary forces in Macaca mulatto. Arch Oral Biol. 1972;17:1519-1535.
12. McNamara JA Jr. Neuromuscular and Skeletal Adaptations to Altered Orofacial Function. Monograph No. 1, Craniofacial Growth Series. Ann Arbor, Mich: Center for Human Growth and Development, The University of Michigan; 1972.
13. McNamara JA Jr. Neuromuscular and skeletal adaptations to altered function in the orofacial region. Am J Orthod. 1973;64:578-606.
14. Kiliaridis S, Engström C, Thilander B. The relationship between masticatory function and Craniofacial morphology. I. A cephalometric longitudinal analysis in the growing rat fed a soft diet. Eur J Orthod. 1985;7:273-283.
15. Kiliaridis S. Muscle function as a determinant of mandibular growth in normal and hypocalcaemic rat. Eur J Orthod. 1989;11:298-308.
16. Gerling JA, Sinclair PM, Roa RL. Effect of pulsating electromagnetic fields on condylar growth. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1985;211-223.
17. Tingey TF, Shapiro PA. Selective inhibition of condylar growth in rabbit mandible using intra-articular papain. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1982;455-464.
18. Peltomaki T, Kylamarkula S, Vinkka-Puhakka H, Rintala M, Kantomaa T, Ronning O. Tissue-separating capacity of growth cartilages. Eur J Orthod. 1997;19:473-481.
19. Basdra EK, Huber LA, Komposch G, Papavassiliou AG. Mechanical loading triggers specific biochemical responses in mandibular condylar chondrocytes. Biochim Biophys Acta 1994;1222:315-322.
20. Ziros J, Basdra EK. Bone-specific transcriptional regulator Cbfal is a target of mechanical signals in osteoblastic cells. J Biochem. 2002;277:23934.
21. Bouvier M. Effects of age on the ability of the rat temporomandibular joint to respond to changing functional demands. J Dent Res. 1988;67:1206-1212.
22. Voudouris JC, Kuftinec MM. Improved clinical use of Twin-block and Herbst as a result of radiating viscoelastic tissue forces on the condyle and fossa in treatment and long-term retention: growth relativity. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000;117:247-266.
23. Rabie ABM, Shum L, Chayanupatkul A. VEGF and bone formation in the glenoid fossa during forward mandibular positioning. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2002;122:202-209.
24. Rabie ABM, Zhao Z, Shen G, Hägg EU, Robinson W. Osteogenesis in the glenoid fossa in response to mandibular advancement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001;119:390-400.
25. Maylia E, Nokes LD. The use of ultrasonics in orthopaedics - a review. Technol Health Care. 1999;7:1-28.
26. Ziskin MC. Applications of ultrasound in medicine-comparison with other modalities. In: Rapacholi MH, Grandolfo M, Rindi A, eds. Ultrasound: Medical Applications, Biological Effects, and Hazard Potential. New York, NY: Plenum Press; 1987:49-59.
27. Dyson M. Therapeutic applications of ultrasound. In: Nyborg WL, Ziskin MC, eds. Biological Effects of Ultrasound. New York, NY: Churchill Livingstone; 1985:121-133.
28. Young SR, Dyson M. The effect of therapeutic ultrasound on angiogenesis. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1990;16:261-269.
29. Tanzer ME, Harvey A, Kay P, Morton, Bobyn JD. Effect of non-invasive low intensity ultrasound on bone growth into porouscoated implants. J Bone Joint Surg. 1996;14:901-906.
30. Abramovich A. Effect of ultrasound on the tibia of the young rat. J Dent Res. 1970;49:1182.
31. Heckman JD, JB Ryaby J, McCabe JJ, Frey, Kilcoyne RF. Acceleration of tibial fracture-healing by non-invasive, low-intensity pulsed ultrasound. J Bone Joint Surg. 1994;76:26-34.
32. El-Bialy TH, Royston TJ, Magin RL, Evans CA, Zaki AM, Frizzell LA. The effect of pulsed ultrasound on mandibular distraction. Ann Biomed Eng. 2002;30(10):1251-1261.
33. Parvizi J, Wu CC, Lewallen DG, Greenleaf JF, Bolander ME. Low-intensity ultrasound stimulates proteoglycan synthesis in rat chondrocytes by increasing aggrecan gene expression. J Orthop Res. 1999;17:488-494.
34. Warden SJ, Favaloro JM, Bennell KL, McMeeken JM, Ng KW, Zajac JD, Wark JD. Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound stimulates a bone-forming response in UMR-106 cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2001;286:443-450.
35. Naruse K, Mikuni-Takagaki Y, Azuma Y, Ito M, Oota T, Kameyama K, Itoman M. Anabolic response of mouse bone-marrow-derived stromal cell clone ST2 cells to low-intensity pulsed ultrasound. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2000;268:216-220.
36. Shui C, Scutt A. Mild heat shock induces proliferation, alkaline phosphatase activity, and mineralization in human bone marrow stromal cells and Mg-63 cells in vitro. J Bone Miner Res. 2001;16:731-741.
37. Chapman IV, MacNally NA, Tucker S. Ultrasound-induced changes in rates of influx and efflux of potassium ions in rat thymocytes in vitro. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1980;6:47-58.
38. Kokubu T, Matsui N, Fujioka H, Tsunoda M, Mizuno T. Low intensity pulsed ultrasound exposure increases prostaglandin E2 production via the induction of cyclooxygenase-2 mRNA in mouse osteoblasts. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1999;256:284-287.
39. Ito M, Azumaa Y, Ohtaa T, Komoriyaa K. Effects of ultrasound and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 on growth factor secretion in co-cultures of osteoblasts and endothelial cells. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2000;26:161-166.
40. Zorlu U, Tercan M, Ozyazgan I, Taskan I, Kardas Y, Balkar F, Ozturk F. Comparative study of the effect of ultrasound and electrostimulation on bone healing in rats. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1998;77:427-432.
41. Nishikori T, Ochi M, Uchio Y, Maniwa S, Kataoka H, Kawasaki K, Katsube K, Kuriwaka M. Effects of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound on proliferation and chondroitin sulfate synthesis of cultured chondrocytes embedded in Atelocollagen gel. J Biomed Mater Res. 2002;59:201-206.
42. Shimazaki A, Inui K, Azuma Y, Nishimura N, Yamano Y. Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound accelerates bone maturation in distraction osteogenesis in rabbits. J Bone Joint Surg. Br. 2000;82-B:1077-1082.
43. Tsai CL, Chang WH, Liu TK. Preliminary studies of duration and intensity of ultrasonic treatments on fracture repair. Chin J Physiol. 1992;35:21-26.
44. Rooney JA. Nonlinear phenomena. Chapter 6 in methods of experimental physics. Vol. 19. In: Edmonds PD, ed. Ultrasonics. New York, NY: Academic Press; 1981:299-353.
45. Glattly AD, McKeown M. The growth of the rabbit skull in 3 dimensions - a radiographic cephalometric appraisal. Anat. Anz. Jena. 1982;151:105-118.
46. Goss SA, Johnston RL, Dunn F. Comprehensive compilation of empirical ultrasonic properties of mammalian tissues. J Acoust Soc Am. 1978;64:423-457.
47. Goss SA, Johnston RL, Dunn F. Compilation of empirical ultrasonic properties of mammalian tissues. II. J Acoust Soc Am. 1980; 68:93-108.