|
Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 147-156
|
Ethics, and Choosing Appropriate Means to an End: Problems with Coal Mine and Nuclear Workplace Safety
|
Author keywords
Administrative actions law; De facto; De jure; Ethics; Health risk law; Performance standards; Pollution standards; Regulation; Specification standards; Uncertainty; Variation; Workplace
|
Indexed keywords
ACCIDENT PREVENTION;
COAL MINES;
PERSONNEL;
POLLUTION CONTROL;
STANDARDS;
EMPLOYERS;
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS;
HEALTH RISKS;
COAL MINE;
ETHICS;
NUCLEAR POWER PLANT;
OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE;
WORKING CONDITIONS;
AIR MONITORING;
ARTICLE;
COAL MINING;
ETHICS;
IONIZING RADIATION;
JOB PERFORMANCE;
LAW;
MINER;
NUCLEAR POWER PLANT;
NUCLEAR REACTOR;
OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE;
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY;
POLLUTION CONTROL;
RADIATION EXPOSURE;
REGULATORY MECHANISM;
SAFETY;
STANDARD;
WELFARE;
WORKER WELFARE;
WORKPLACE;
AIR POLLUTANTS, RADIOACTIVE;
COAL MINING;
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING;
HUMANS;
OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE;
OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH;
POWER PLANTS;
RISK MANAGEMENT;
UNITED STATES;
UNITED STATES OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION;
|
EID: 1442354784
PISSN: 02724332
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00418.x Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (4)
|
References (22)
|