Contact urticaria to natural rubber latex in childhood and associated atopic symptoms: A study of 27 patients aged under 15 years;Atopie et urticaire de contact au latex chez l'enfant: Etude chez 27 malades de moins de 15 ans

Annales de Dermatologie et de Venereologie

Volumn 131, Issue 1 I, 2004, Pages 35-37

  Guillet, M H ^a   Guillet, G ^a  

^a POITIERS UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

IMMUNOGLOBULIN E; LATEX;

ADOLESCENT; ALLERGY; ARTICLE; ASTHMA; ATOPY; CHILD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONJUNCTIVITIS; CONTACT URTICARIA; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSS ALLERGY; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; FEMALE; FICUS; FOLLOW UP; FOOD ALLERGY; HUMAN; HYPERSENSITIVITY; MALE; PACIFIER; RESPIRATORY TRACT DISEASE; RHINITIS; SYMPTOMATOLOGY; SYNCOPE;

EID: 1442349787     PISSN: 01519638     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s0151-9638(04)93539-9     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Ownby D, Ownby M, Mac Cullough J, Shafer A. The prevalence of anti latex IgE antibodies in 1 000 volunteers blood donners. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1996;97:1188-92.
2. Lezaun A, Marcos C, Martin J, Quirce S, Diez Gomez ML. Contact dermatitis from natural latex. Contact Dermatitis 1992;27:334-5.
3. Brehler R, Rutter A, Kutting B. Allergenicity of natural rubber gloves. Contact Dermatitis 2002;46:65-7.
4. Pecquet C. Facteurs de risque d'allergie au latex. Rev Fr Allergol Immunol Clin 2002;21 (suppl 1):132-8.
5. Turjanmaa K, Reunala I, Rasanen L. Comparison of diagnostic methods in latex surgical glove urticaria. Contact dermatitis 1988;19:241-7.
6. Brehler R, Abrams E, Sedlmayr S. Cross reactivity between ficus benjamina (weeping fig) and natural rubber latex. Allergy 1998;53: 402-6.
7. Nutter A. Contact urticaria to rubber. Br J Dermatol 1979;101:597-8.
8. Janssens V, Morren M, Dooms Goosens A, Degreef H. Protein contact dermatitis: myth or reality. Br J Dermatol 1995;132:1-6.
9. Heesse A, Hintzenstern J, Peters K, Koch H, Hornstein O. Allergic and irritant reactions to rubber gloves in medical health services: spectrum, diagnostic approach and therapy. J Am Acad Dermatol 1991;25:831-9.
10. Bernardini R, Novembre E, Lombardi E, Mezzetti A, Cianferoni A, Danti D et al. Risk factors for latex allergy with spina bifida and latex sensitization. Clin Exp Allergy 1999;29:681-6.
11. Moneret Vautrin D, Beaudouin E, Widmer S, Mouton C, Kanny G, Prestat F. Prospective study of risk factors in natural rubber latex hypersensitivity. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1993;92:668-77.
12. Axelsson J, Eriksson M, Wrangsjo K. Anaphylaxis and angio oedema due to rubber allergy in children. Acta Paediatr Scand 1988;77: 314-6.
13. Jaeger D, Kleinhans D, Czuppon A, Baur X. Latex specific proteins causing immediate-type cutaneous nasal, bronchial and systemic reactions. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1992;89:759-68.
14. Roul S, Ducombs G, Taieb A. Usefulness of the European standard series for patch test in children. A 3 year single center study of 337 patients. Contact Dermatitis 1999;40:232-5.
15. Romaguera C, Vilaplana J. Contact dermatitis in children: 6 years of experience (1992-1997). Contact Dematitis 1998;39:277-80.
16. Taylor J, Pradicsuvan P. Latex allergy. Review of 44 cases including outcome and frequent associations with allergic eczema. Arch Dermatol 1996;132:265-71.
17. Nettis E, Dambra P, Soccio A, Loria MP, Ferrannini A, Tursi A. Type I allergy to natural rubber latex and type IV allergy to rubber chemicals in children with risk factors. Contact Dermatitis 2001;44:181-2.
18. Sommer S, Wilkinson S, Beck M, English J, Gawkrodger D, Green C. Type IV hypersensitivity reactions to naturel rubber latex: results of a multicentre study. Br J Dermatol 2002;146:114-7.
19. Guillet MH, Moisan S, Guillet G. De l'eczéma de contact au latex à l'anaphylaxie chez l'atopique: à propos de 9 cas sur 26 observations. Rev Fr Allergol Immunol Clin 1997;8:1153.