Rough approximation of pairwise comparisons described by multi-attribute stochastic dominance

Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis

Volumn 8, Issue 5, 1999, Pages 291-297

  Zaras, Kazimierz ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DU QUÉBEC EN ABITIBI TÉMISCAMINGUE   (Canada)

Author keywords

Decision making; Multi attribute stochastic dominance; Multiple attributes; Preferences; Rough sets theory

Indexed keywords

EID: 1442336363     PISSN: 10579214     EISSN: 10991360     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1360(199909)8:5<291::AID-MCDA255>3.0.CO;2-5     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Greco, S., Matarazzo, B., and Slowinski, R., ‘Rough set approach to multi-attribute choice and ranking problems’, ICS Research Report 38/95, Warsaw University of Technology, Warsaw (1995).
2. Greco, S., Matarazzo, B., and Slowinski, R., ‘Rough set approach to multi-attribute choice and ranking problems’, ICS Research Report 38/95, Warsaw University of Technology, Warsaw (1995), in Fandel, G. and Gal, T. (eds), Multiple Criteria Decision Making, Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference, Hagen, Germany, Berlin: Springer, 1997.
3. Greco, S., Matarazzo, B., and Slowinski, R., ‘Rough approximation of a preference relation by fuzzy dominance relation’, in Proceedings of International Conference on Methods and Applications of Multicriteria Decision Making, FUCAM Mons, May 11-14, 1997a.
4. Greco, S., Matarazzo, B., and Slowinski, R., in Fandel, G. and Gal, T. (eds), Multiple Criteria Decision Making, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1997b.
5. Greco, S., Matarazzo, B., Slowinski, R., and Tsoukiàs, A., ‘Exploitation of a rough approximation of the outranking relation’', Cahier du Lamsade, 152 December (1997c).
6. Greco, S., Matarazzo, B., and Slowinski, R., ‘Rough approximation of a preference relation by dominance relations’, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 117 (1999).
7. Huang, C.C., Kira, D., and Vertinsky, I., ‘Stochastic dominance rules for multiattribute utility functions’, Rev. Econ. Stud., 41 (1978).
8. Keeney, R.L., and Nair, K., ‘Selecting nuclear power plant sites in the Pacific Northwest using decision analysis’, in Bell, D.E., Keeney, R.L. and Raiffa, H. (eds), Conflicting Objectives in Decisions, John Wiley and Sons, IIASA, 1977.
9. Levy, H., and Sarnat, M., Portfolio and Investment Selection: Theory and Practice, Prentice-Hall, 1984.
10. Pawlak, Z., Rough Sets. Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning about Data, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1991.
11. Pawlak, Z., ‘Rough set approach to knowledge-based decision support’, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 99 (1997).
12. Pawlak, Z., and Slowinski, R., ‘Rough set approach to multi-attribute decision analysis’, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 72 (1994).
13. Roy, B., and Bouyssou, D., Aide Multicritere a la Decision: Methodes et Cas, Paris: Economica, 1993.
14. Slowinski, R., (ed.), Intelligent Decision Support. Handbook of Applications and Advances of the Rough Sets Theory, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1992.
15. Slowinski, R., ‘Rough set learning of preferential attitude in multi-criteria decision making’, in Komorowski, J. and Ras, Z.W. (eds), Methodologies for Intelligent Systems, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, vol. 689, Berlin: Springer, 1993.
16. Zaras, K., and Martel, J.M., ‘Multiattribute analysis based on stochastic dominance’, in Munier, B. and Machina, M.J. (eds), Models and Experiments in Risk and Rationality, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1994.
17. Zaras, K., ‘Dominances stochastiques pour deux classes de fonctions d’utilité: concaves et convexes’, RO/OR, Recherche Opérationnelle, 23 (1989).