The (Im) Morality of (Un) Naturalness

Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 15-19

  Takala, Tuija ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOTECHNOLOGY; CLONING; CROSS BREEDING; DECISION MAKING; DNA MODIFICATION; ETHICS; GENE; GENE TECHNOLOGY; HOMOSEXUALITY; HUMAN; MORALITY; NATURAL SCIENCE; PHILOSOPHY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; RELIGION; REVIEW; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; THEORY;

EID: 1442324835     PISSN: 09631801     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/s0963180104131046     Document Type: Review

References (8)

1. Hume D. A treatise of human nature [orig. 1739-40]. In: Raphael DD, ed. British Moralists 1650-1800. Indianapolis, Ind.: Hackett; 1991:510-1.
2. Bentham J. The principles of morals and legislation [orig. 1780, 1789, 1823]. In: Raphael DD, ed. British Moralists 1650-1800. Indianapolis, Ind.: Hackett; 1991:959-63.
3. See note 1, Hume 1991.
4. Macklin R. The ethics of gene patenting. In: Thompson AK, Chadwick RF, eds. Genetic Information: Acquisition, Access, and Control. New York: Plenum; 1999:127-37.
5. See note 1, Hume 1991:504.
6. Copleston FC. A History of Philosophy, Vol. 2. Tunbridge Wells, UK: Burns and Oates; 1999 [1950]. This is the Aquinian version. There are others who do not put so much emphasis on reason, but, following Aristotle, Aquinas did. Given that not all have the ability or time, a divine revelation, such as the Decalogue, is also needed.
7. Aquinas T. On Law, Morality, and Politics. Baumgarth WP, Regan RJ, eds. Indianapolis, Ind.: Hackett; 1988:47-8.
8. See: Midgley M. Biotechnology and monstrosity: why should we pay attention to the "yuk factor"? Hastings Center Report 2000;30(5):7-15.