Integrating multiple wilderness values into a decision-making model for Denali National Park and Preserve

Journal for Nature Conservation

Volumn 11, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 355-362

  Lawson, Steven R ^a   Manning, Robert E ^b  

^a WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT   (United States)

Author keywords

Denali National Park and Preserve; Indicators and standards of quality; Norms; Stated choice analysis; Wilderness management

Indexed keywords

CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; MODEL; RECREATIONAL MANAGEMENT; WILDERNESS AREA;

ALASKA; DENALI NATIONAL PARK; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 1442315560     PISSN: 16171381     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1078/1617-1381-00068     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Adamowicz W, Louviere J & Williams M (1994) Combining Revealed and Stated Preference Methods for Valuing Environmental Amenities. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 26: 271-292.
2. Boxall P, Adamowicz W, Swait J, Williams M & Louviere J (1996) A Comparison of Stated Preference Methods for Environmental Valuation. Ecological Economics 18: 243-253.
3. Bullock C, Elston D & Chalmers N (1998) An Application of Economic Choice Experiments to a Traditional Land Use - Deer Hunting and Landscape Change in the Scottish Highlands. Journal of Environmental Management 52: 335-351.
4. Bultena G, Albrecht D & Womble P (1981) Freedom Versus Control: A Study of Backpackers' Preferences for Wilderness Management. Leisure Sciences 4: 297-310.
5. Cole D (1996) Wilderness Recreation Use Trends. 1965 Through 1994. USDA Forest Service Research Paper INT-RP-488.
6. Cole D, Watson A, Hall T & Spildie D (1997) High-use Destinations in Wilderness: Social and Biophysical Impacts, Visitor Responses, and Management Options. USDA Forest Service Research Paper INT-RP-496.
7. Dennis D (1998) Analyzing Public Inputs to Multiple Objective Decisions on National Forests Using Conjoint Analysis. Forest Science 44: 421-429.
8. Green P & Srinivasan V (1978) Conjoint Analysis in Consumer Research: Issues and Outlook. Journal of Consumer Research 5: 103-123.
9. Haider W & Ewing G (1990) A Model of Tourist Choices of Hypothetical Caribbean Destinations. Leisure Sciences 12: 33-47.
10. Hall T (2001) Use Limits in Wilderness: Assumptions and Gaps in Knowledge. Visitor Use Density and Wilderness Experiences: Proceedings. USDA Forest Service Proceedings RMRS-p-20: 29-38.
11. Hanemann W (1984) Welfare Evaluations in Contingent Valuation Experiments with Discrete Responses. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 66: 332-341.
12. Hosmer D & Lemeshow S (2000) Applied Logistic Regression. Wiley, New York.
13. Lawson S & Manning R (2000a) Crowding Versus Access at Delicate Arch, Arches National Park: An Indifference Curve Analysis. Proceedings of the Third Symposium on Social Aspects and Recreation Research.
14. Lawson S & Manning R (2000b) Evaluating Multiple Dimensions of Visitors' Tradeoffs Between Access and Crowding at Arches National Park Using Indifference Curve Analysis. Proceedings of the Third Symposium on Social Aspects and Recreation Research.
15. Lawson S & Manning R (2001a) Crossing experiential boundaries: Visitor preferences regarding tradeoffs among social, resource, and managerial attributes of the Denali wilderness experience. The George Wright Forum 18: 10-27.
16. Lawson S & Manning R (2001b) Solitude Versus Access: A Study of Tradeoffs in Outdoor Recreation Using Indifference Curve Analysis. Leisure Sciences 23: 179-191.
17. Lawson S & Manning R (2002) Tradeoffs Among Social, Resource, and Management Attributes of the Denali Wilderness Experience: A Contextual Approach to Normative Research. Leisure Sciences 24: 297-312.
18. Louviere J, Hensher D & Swait J (2000) Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Application. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
19. Louviere J & Timmermans H (1990a) Stated Preference and Choice Models Applied to Recreation Research: A Review. Leisure Sciences 12: 9-32.
20. Louviere J & Timmermans H (1990b) Using Hierarchical Information Integration to Model Consumer Responses to Possible Planning Actions: Recreation Destination Choice Illustration. Environment and Planning 22: 291-308.
21. Louviere J & Woodworth G (1985) Models of Park Choice Derived From Experimental and Observational Data: A Case Study in Johnston County, Iowa. University of Iowa, Iowa City Technical Report.
22. Mackenzie J (1993) A Comparison of Contingent Preference Models. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 75: 593-603.
23. Manning R (1999) Studies in Outdoor Recreation: Search and Research for Satisfaction. Oregon State University Press, Corvallis.
24. Manning R, Valliere W, Wang B & Jacobi C (1999) Crowding norms: Alternative Measurement Approaches. Leisure Sciences 21: 97-115.
25. Merigliano L (1990) Indicators to Monitor the Wilderness Recreation Experience. Managing America's Enduring Wilderness Resource: 156-162. University of Minnesota, St. Paul.
26. Nicholson W (1995) Microeconomic Theory: Basic Principles and Extensions. Dryden Press, Fort Worth.
27. Opaluch J, Swallow S, Weaver T, Wessells C & Wichelns D (1993) Evaluating Impacts from Noxious Facilities: Including Public Preferences in Current Siting Mechanisms. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 24: 41-59.
28. Roggenbuck J, Williams D & Watson A (1993) Defining Acceptable Conditions in Wilderness. Environmental Management 17: 187-197.
29. Schroeder H, Dwyer J, Louviere J & Anderson D (1990) Monetary and Nonmonetary Trade-Offs of Urban Forest Site Attributes in a Logit Model of Recreation Choice. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report RM-197: 41-51.
30. Shindler B & Shelby B (1993) Regulating Wilderness Use: An Investigation of User Group Support. Journal of Forestry 91: 41-44.
31. Shindler B & Shelby B (1992) User Assessment of Ecological and Social Campsite Attributes. Defining Wilderness Quality: The Role of Standards in Wilderness Management - A Workshop Proceedings. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report PNW-305: 107-114.
32. Whittaker D (1992) Selecting Indicators: Which Impacts Matter More? Defining Wilderness Quality: The Role of Standards in Wilderness Management - A Workshop Proceedings. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report PNW-305: 13-22.