The effect of discordant sensory information in graphic production: Two distinct subject groups

Psychological Research

Volumn 67, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 291-302

  Gullaud Toussaint, Lucette ^a   Vinter, Annie ^b  

^a MSHS   (France)

^b CNRS   (France)

Author keywords

Feedback control; Feedforward control; Mirror drawing; Visuo proprioceptive conflicts

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; DEPTH PERCEPTION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTION DISORDER; PROBLEM SOLVING; PROPRIOCEPTION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REACTION TIME;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEEDBACK; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PERCEPTUAL DISTORTION; PROBLEM SOLVING; PROPRIOCEPTION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REACTION TIME; REVERSAL LEARNING; SPACE PERCEPTION;

EID: 1442305188     PISSN: 03400727     EISSN: 14302772     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00426-002-0129-y     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Bard, C., Hay, L., & Fleury, M. (1985). Contribution of vision to the performance and learning of a directional aiming task in children aged 6, 9 and 11. In Y.E. Clark & J. H. Humphrey (Eds.), Motor development: current selected research, vol I. (pp. 19-33).
2. Benzécri, J. P. (1973). L'analyse de données, vol 2. Paris: Dunod.
3. Broderick, P., & Laszlo, J. I. (1987). The drawing of squares and diamonds: a perceptual-motor task analysis. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 43, 44-61.
4. Greenacre, M. J. (1984). Theory and applications of correspondence analysis. London: Academic Press.
5. Gullaud, L. (1998). Système de références spatiales et production graphique séquentielle: Une approche au moyen des paradigmes de suppression visuelle et de conflits visuo-proprioceptifs. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, University of Dijon, France.
6. Gullaud, L., & Vinter, A. (1996). The role of visual and proprioceptive information in mirror-drawing behavior. In M. L. Simner, C. G. Leedham, & A. J. M. W. Thomassen (Eds.), Handwriting and drawing research: basic and applied issues (pp. 99-113). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
7. Gullaud, L., & Vinter, A. (1998). Rôle de la vision dans la direction de mouvements graphiques simples. L'Année Psychologique, 98, 401-428.
8. Hay, L. (1979). Spatial-temporal analysis of movements in children: motor programs versus feedback in the development of reaching. Journal of Motor Behavior, 11, 189-200.
9. Hay, L. (1984). Discontinuity in the development of motor control in children. In W. Prinz & A. F. Sanders (Eds.), Cognition and motor processes (pp. 351-360). Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer.
10. Henry, F. M. (1975). Absolute error vs. "E" in target accuracy. Journal of Motor Behavior, 7, 227-228.
11. Lajoie, Y., Paillard, J., Teasdale, N., Bard, C., Fleury, M., Forget, R., & Lamarre, Y. (1992). Mirror drawing in a deafferented patient and normal subjects: visuoproprioceptive conflict. Neurologia, 42, 1104-1106.
12. Meulenbroek, R. G. J., & Thomassen, A. J. W. M. (1991). Stroke-direction preferences in drawing and handwriting. Human Movement Science, 10, 247-270.
13. Olivier, I., Audiffren, M., & Ripoll, H. (1998). Age-related differences in the preparatory processes of motor programming. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 69, 49-65.
14. Paillard, J. (1991). Les bases nerveuses du contrôle visuo-manuel de l'écriture. In C. Sirat, J. Trigoin, & E. Poulle (Eds.), L'écriture, le cerveau, l'oeil et la main (pp. 23-52). Paris: Brepols.
15. Plamondon, R., & Clément, B. (1991). Dependence of peripheral and central parameters describing handwriting generation on movement direction. Human Movement Science, 10, 193-221.
16. Redding, G. M., & Wallace, B. (1988a). Components of prism adaptation in terminal and concurrent exposure: organization of eye-hand coordination loop. Perceptual Psychophysics, 44, 59-68.
17. Redding, G. M., & Wallace, B. (1988b). Adaptive mechanisms in perceptual-motor coordination: components of prism adaptation. Journal of Motor Behavior, 20, 242-254.
18. Redding, G. M., & Wallace, B. (1996). Adaptive spatial alignment and strategic perceptual-motor control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 379-394.
19. Schmidt, R. A. (1988). Motor control and learning: a behavioral emphasis, 2nd edn. Champaign, Ill.: Human Kinetics.
20. Teasdale, N., Forget, R., Bard, C., Paillard, J., Fleury, M., & Lamarre, Y. (1993). The role of proprioceptive information for the production of isometric forces and for handwriting tasks. Acta Psychologica, 82, 179-191.
21. Teulings, H. L., & Maarse, F. J. (1984). Digital recording and processing of handwriting movements. Human Movement Science, 3, 193-219.
22. Thomassen, A. J. W. M., Tibosch, H. J. C. M., & Maarse, F. J. (1989). The effect of context on stroke direction and stroke order in handwriting. In R. Plamondon, C. Y. Suen, & M. L. Simner (Eds.), Computer recognition and human production of handwriting (pp. 213-230). Singapore: World Scientific.
23. Uhlarik, J. J., & Canon, L. K. (1971). Influence of concurrent and terminal exposure conditions on the nature of perceptual adaptation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 91, 233-239.
24. Van Doorn, R. R. A. (1992). Axial pen pressure during handwriting movements in conditions with and without vision. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 23, 41-52.
25. Van Doorn, R. R. A., & Keuss, P. J. G. (1992). The role of vision in the temporal and spatial control of handwriting. Acta Psychologica, 81, 269-286.
26. Van Doorn, R. R. A., & Keuss, P. J. G. (1993). Spatial invariance of handwriting: a matter of definition. Reading and Writing, 5, 281-296.
27. Van Sommers, P. (1984). Drawing and cognition: Descriptive and experimental studies of graphic production processes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28. Vinter, A., & Meulenbroek, R. G. J. (1993). The role of manual dominance and visual feedback in circular drawing movements. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 25, 11-37.