Assessing automaticity in audiovisual speech integration: Evidence from the speeded classification task

Cognition

Volumn 92, Issue 3, 2004, Pages

  Soto Faraco, Salvador ^a   Navarra, Jordi ^a   Alsius, Agnès ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Attention; Audiovisual speech; McGurk illusion; Multisensory integration; Speeded discrimination

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; AUDITORY STIMULATION; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; EXPERIMENT; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPEECH PERCEPTION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

EID: 1442302274     PISSN: 00100277     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2003.10.005     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Calvert G.A., Bullmore E.T., Brammer M.J., Campbell R., Williams S.C., McGuire P.K., Woodruff P.W., Iversen S.D., David A.S. Activation of auditory cortex during silent lipreading. Science. 276:1997;593-596.
2. Colin C., Radeau M., Soquet A., Demolin D., Colin F., Deltenre P. Mismatch negativity evoked by the McGurk-MacDonald effect: a phonetic representation within short-term memory. Clinical Neurophysiology. 113:2002;495-506.
3. De Gelder B., Bertelson P. Multisensory integration, perception and ecological validity. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 7:2003;460-467.
4. Duncan J., Martens S., Ward R. Restricted attentional capacity within but not between sensory modalities. Nature. 387:1997;808-810.
5. Easton R.D., Basala M. Perceptual dominance during lipreading. Perception and Psychophysics. 32:1982;562-570.
6. Garner W.R. The processing of information and structure. 1974;Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
7. Green K.P., Kuhl P.K. Integral processing of visual place and auditory voicing information during phonetic perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 17:1991;278-288.
8. Joseph J.S., Chun M.M., Nakayama K. Attentional requirements in a "preattentive" feature search task. Nature. 387:1997;805-807.
9. Liberman A.M., Mattingly I.G. The motor theory of speech perception revised. Cognition. 21:1985;1-36.
10. Maddox W.T. Perceptual and decisional separability. Ashby F.G. Multidimensional models of perception and cognition. Scientific psychology series. 1992;147-180 Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
11. Marks, L. E (in press). Cross-modal interactions in speeded classification. In G. Calvert, C. Spence, & B. Stein (Eds.), The handbook of multisensory processes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12. Massaro D.W. Speech perception by ear and eye: a paradigm for psychological inquiry. 1987;Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
13. Massaro D.W. Perceiving talking faces: from speech perception to a behavioral principle. 1998;MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
14. McGurk H., MacDonald J. Hearing lips and seeing voices. Nature. 265:1976;746-748.
15. Pallier, C (1994). Rôle de la syllabe dans la perception de la parole: études attentionelles. Doctoral dissertation presented at the École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales, Paris (available online at: http://www.pallier.org/papers/thesis/thsplra4.pdf ).
16. Rees G., Frith C.D., Lavie N. Modulating irrelevant motion perception by varying attentional load in an unrelated task. Science. 278:1997;1616-1619.
17. Rees G., Russell C., Frith C.D., Driver J. Inattentional blindness versus inattentional amnesia for fixated but ignored words. Science. 286:1999;2504-2507.
18. Reisberg D., McLean J., Goldfield A. Easy to hear but hard to understand: a lip-reading advantage with intact auditory stimuli. Dodd B., Campbell R. Hearing by eye: the psychology of lip-reading. 1987;Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
19. Rosemblum L.D., Saldaña H.M. An audiovisual test of kinematic primitives for visual speech perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 22:1996;318-331.
20. Sinnett, S. C., Soto-Faraco, S., & Costa, A (2003). Inattentional blindness for words. Poster presented at the XIIIth congress of the European Society for Cognitive Psychology, Granada, Spain.
21. Soto-Faraco, S., Alsius, A., Navarra, J., & Campbell, R (2003). Assessing automaticity in audiovisual integration of speech. Poster presented at the 4th International Multisensory Research Forum, Toronto, Canada.
22. Sumby W., Pollack I. Visual contribution to speech intelligibility in noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 26:1954;212-215.
23. Summerfield Q., McGrath M. Detection and resolution of audiovisual incompatibility perception in vowels. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 36A:1984;51-74.
24. Tomiak G.R., Mullennix J.W., Sawusch J.R. Integral processing of phonemes: evidence for a phonetic mode of perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 81:1987;755-764.
25. Treisman A.M., Gelade G. A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology. 12:1980;97-136.
26. Wickens C.D. Processing resources in attention. Parasuraman R., Davies D.R. Varieties of attention. 1984;63-102 Academic Press, San Diego, CA.