Advancing human geography at the commencement du siècle

Professional Geographer

Volumn 56, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 44-52

  Warf, Barney ^a  

^a FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Critical human geography; Poststructualism

Indexed keywords

GEOGRAPHICAL RESEARCH; GEOGRAPHY EDUCATION; HUMAN GEOGRAPHY;

EID: 1442289625     PISSN: 00330124     EISSN: 14679272     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0033-0124.2004.05601007.x     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Agnew, J., and S. Corbridge. 1995. Mastering space: Hegemony, territory, and international political economy. London: Routledge.
2. Amin, A. 1994. Post-Fordism: Models, fantasies, and phantoms of transition. In Post-Fordism: A reader, ed. A. Amin, 1-40. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
3. Appadurai, A. 1996. Modernity at large: Cultural dimensions of globalization. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
4. Barnes, T. 1996. Logics of dislocation. New York: Guilford.
5. Barnes, T., and J. Duncan, eds. 1992. Writing worlds: Discourse, text, and metaphor in the representation of landscape. London: Routledge.
6. Bell, D., and G. Valentine. 1997. Consuming geographies: We are where we eat. London: Roudedge.
7. Bhabha, H. 1994. The location of culture. London: Roudedge.
8. Bonnett, A 1997. Geography, “race,” and whiteness: Invisible traditions and current challenges. Area 29:193-99.
9. Castells, M. 1996. The information age. Vol. 1, The rise of the network society. Oxford: Blackwell.
10. Castree, N. 2001. Socializing nature: Theory, practice, and politics. In Social nature: Theory, practice, and politics, ed. N. Castree and B. Braun, 1-21. London: Blackwell.
11. Cox, K., ed. 1997. Spaces of globalization: Reasserting the power of the local. New York: Guilford.
12. Crang, M., P. Crang, and J. May. 1999. Virtual geographies: Bodies, space, and relations. London: Routledge.
13. Dear, M. 2002. From Chicago to L.A.: Making sense of urban theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
14. Delaney, D. 2002. The space that race makes. The Professional Geographer 54:6-14.
15. Dicken, P. 1998. Global shift: The internationalization of economic activity. 3rd ed. New York: Guilford Press.
16. Dodge, M., and R. Kitchin. 2001. Mapping Cyberspace. London: Routledge.
17. Driver, F. 1992. Geography’s empire: Histories of geographical knowledge. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 10:23-40.
18. Duncan, N., ed. 1996. BodySpace. London: Roudedge.
19. Dwyer, O., and J. P. Jones. 2000. White sociospatial epistemology. Social and Cultural Geography 1: 209-21.
20. Featherstone, M., and S. Lash, eds. 1999. Spaces of culture. London: Sage.
21. Fitzsimmons, M. 1989. The matter ofnature.Atitipode 21:106-20.
22. Giddens, A. 1984. The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Berkeley: University of California Press.
23. Graham, S., and S. Marvin. 1996. Telecommunications and the city: Electronic spaces, urban places. London: Roudedge.
24. Granovetter, M. 1985. Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology 91:481-510.
25. Gregory, D. 1994. Geographical imaginations. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
26. Gregory, D. 1995. Imaginative geographies. Progress in Human Geography 19:447-85.
27. Gregory, D. 2001. Postcolonialism and the production of nature, hi Social nature: Theory, practice, and politics, ed. N. Castree and B. Braun, 84-111. Oxford: Blackwell.
28. Hanson, S., and G. Pratt 1995 Gender, work, andspace. London: Roudedge.
29. Haraway, D. 1991. Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature. New York: Routledge.
30. Harley, J. 1989. Deconstructing die map. Cartogra-phica 26:1-20.
31. Hartwick, E. 1998. Geographies of consumption: A commodity-chain approach. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 16:423-37.
32. Harvey, D. 1996. Justice, nature, and the geography of difference. Oxford: Blackwell.
33. Harvey, D. 2000. Spaces of hope. Oxford: Blackwell.
34. Herod, A., G. O Tuathail, and S. Roberts, eds. 1997. An windy world? Globalization, governance, and geography. London: Routledge.
35. Hillis, K. 1998. On the margins: The invisibility of communications in geography. Progress in Human Geography 22:543-66.
36. Holloway, S. 2000. Identity, contingency, and die urban geography of “race.” Social and Cultural Geography 1:197-208.
37. Hubbard, P., R. Kitchin, B. Bartley, and D. Fuller. Thinking geographically: Space, theory, and contemporary human geography. London: Continuum.
38. Jackson, P. 1991. The cultural politics of masculinity: Towards a social geography Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 16:199-214.
39. Jackson, P., and J. Penrose, eds. 1994. Constructions of race, place, and nation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
40. Kenney, J. 1995. Climate, race, and imperial authority: The symbolic landscape of the British Hill Station in India. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 85:694-714.
41. King, A., ed. 1997. Culture, globalization, and the world-system. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
42. Kirby, K 1996. Indifferent boundaries: Spatial coticepts of human subjectivity. New York: Guilford.
43. Kitchin, R. 1998. Cyberspace: The world in the wires. New York: J ohn Wiley and Sons.
44. Knox, P. 1995. World cities and the organization of global space. In Geographies of global change, ed. R.J. Johnston, P. Taylor, and M. Watts, 232-47. Oxford: Blackwell.
45. Kobayashi, A, and L. Peake. 1994. Unnatural discourse: “Race” and gender in geography. Getider, Place, and Culture 1:225-44.
46. Kobayashi, A., and L. Peake. 2000. Racism out of place: Thoughts of whiteness and an antiracist geography in the new millennium. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 90:392-403.
47. Lauria, M. 1997. Reconstructing urban regime theory: Regulating urban politics in a global economy. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
48. Lefebvre, H. (1974) 1991. The production of space. Oxford: Blackwell.
49. Luke, T. 1997. At die end of nature: Cyborgs, “huma-chines,” and environments in postmodernity. Etrui-ronmen t and Plann ing A 29:1367-80.
50. Marsden, T., and N. Wrigley. 1999. Regulation, retailing, and consumption. Environment and Planning A 27:1899-912.
51. Massey, D. 1994. Space, place, and gender. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
52. Miller, B. 1992. Collective action and rational choice: Place, community, and the limits to individual self-interest. Economic Geography 68:22-42.
53. Peake, L., and R. Schein. 2000. Racing geography into the new millennium: Studies of “race” and North American geographies. Social and Cultural Geography 1:133-42.
54. Philo, C. 2000. Foucault’s geography, hi Thinking space, ed. M. Crang and N. Thrift. London: Roudedge.
55. Pickles, J., ed. 1995. Ground truth: The social implications of geographic information systems. New York: Guilford.
56. Pile, S., and N. Thrift, eds. 1995. Mapping the subject. London: Routledge.
57. Proctor, J. 1998. The social construction of nature. Armais of the Association of American Geographers 88:352-76.
58. Pulido, L. 2000. Rethinking environmental racism: White privilege and urban development in soudi-em California. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 90:12-40.
59. Rose, G. 1993. Feminism and geography: The limits of geographical knowledge. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
60. Said, E. 1978. Orientalism. New York: Vintage.
61. Sassen, S. 1991. The global city: New York, London, Tokyo. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
62. Schatzki, T., and W. Natter, eds. 1997. The social and political body. New York: Guilford.
63. Seager, J., and M. Domosh. 2001. Putting women in place: Feminist geographers make sense of the world. New York: Guilford.
64. Sheppard, E. 2001. Quantitative geography: Representations, practices, and possibilities. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 19:535-54.
65. Slater, D. 1997. Geopolitical imaginations across die North-South divide: Issues of difference, development, and power. Political Geography 16:631-53.
66. Smith, J. 1996. Geographical rhetoric: Modes and tropes of appeal. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 86:1-20.
67. Soja, E. 2000. Postmetropolis. Oxford: Blackwell.
68. Storper, M. 1997. The regiotial world: Territorial development in a global economy. New York: Guilford.
69. Sui, D. 2000. Visuality, aurality, and Shifting metaphors of geographical di ought in die late twentieth century. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 90:322-43.
70. Swyngedouw, E. 1997. Neither global nor local: “Glo-calization” and the politics of scale. In Spaces of globalization: Reasserting the power of the local, ed. K. Cox, 137-66. New York: Guilford.
71. Taylor, R 2000. World cities and territorial states under conditions of contemporary globalization. Political Geography 19:5-32.
72. Taylor, R, and C. Flint 2000. Political geography: World-Economy, nation-state, and locality, 4di ed. New York: Prentice Hall.
73. Thrift, N., and K. Olds. 1996. Reconfiguring the economic in economic geography. Progress in Human Geography 20:311-37.
74. Warf, B. 1995. Telecommunications and die changing geographies of knowledge transmission in the late 20th century. Urban Studies 32:361-78.
75. Wood, D. 1992. The power of maps. New York: Guilford.
76. Zimmerer, K. 1994. Human geography and die new ecology: The prospect and promise of integration. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 84:108-25.