From chicago to l.A. and back again: A chicago-inspired quantitative analysis of income distribution in montreal*

Professional Geographer

Volumn 56, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 109-126

  Shearmur, Richard ^a   Charron, Mathieu ^a  

^a CENTRE URBANISATION CULTURE SOCIÉTÉ   (Canada)

Author keywords

Income distribution; Metropolitan form; Montreal; Post modern geography; Quantitative geography

Indexed keywords

GEOGRAPHICAL THEORY; GEOGRAPHICAL THOUGHT; INCOME DISTRIBUTION; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; URBAN GEOGRAPHY;

CANADA; MONTREAL; NORTH AMERICA; QUEBEC [CANADA];

EID: 1442287170     PISSN: 00330124     EISSN: 14679272     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0033-0124.2004.05601016.x     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Adams, J. 2001. The quantitative revolution in urban geography. Urban Geography 22 (6): 530-39.
2. Alien, P. 1997. Cities and regions as evolutionary complex systems. Geographical Systems 4:103-30.
3. Alonso, W. 1964. Location and land use. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
4. Anas, A., R. Arnott, and K. Small. 1998. Urban spatial structure. Journal of Economic Literature 36:1426-64.
5. Barnes, T., and M. Curry. 1992. Postmodernism in economic geography: Metaphor and the construction of alterity. Environment and Planning D 10: 57-68.
6. Berry, B. 2001. The Chicago School in retrospect and prospect Urban Geography 22 (6): 559-61.
7. Bird, J. 1989. The changing worlds of geography. New York: Oxford University Press.
8. Burgess, E. 1925. The growth of the city. In The city, ed. R. Park, E. Burgess, and R. McKenzie, 37-44. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
9. Castells, M., and P. Hall. 1994. Technopoles of the world: Th e making of 21 st-century industrial complexes. London: Routledge.
10. Charron, M. 2002. L’évolution de la ségrégation résidentielle à Montréal, 1951 à 1996. Master’s thesis, Geography Department Université du Quebec à Montréal, http://www.vrm.ca/documents/mathieucharron.pdf.
11. Clark, W. 2001. Pacific views of urban geography in the 1960s. Urban Geography 22 (6): 540-48.
12. Coffey, W., M. Polèse, and R. Shearmur. 2000. La restructuration de l’économie Montréalaise: comparaisons avec d’autres métropoles nord-américaines. Montreal: INRS-Urbanisation.
13. Dear, M. 1988. The postmodern challenge: Reconstructing human geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geography NS 13:262-74.
14. Dear, M. 2001. From Chicago to L.A.: Making sense of urban theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15. Dear, M., and S. Flusty. 2001a. Los Angeles as postmodern urbanism. In From Chicago to L.A., ed. M. Dear, 61-84. Thousand Oaks, CA Sage.
16. Dear, M., and S. Flusty. 2001b. The resistible rise of the L.A. School, hi From Chicago to L.A., ed. M. Dear, 5-16. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17. Dicken, P., and P. Lloyd. 1990. Location in space. New York: Guilford Press.
18. Ethington, P., and M. Meeker. 2001. Saber y Conocer: The Metropolis of Urban Enquiry, hi From Chicago to L.A., ed. M. Dear, 405-20. Thousand Oaks, CA Sage.
19. Foggin, P., andM. Polèse. 1976. La géographie sociale de Montréal, Études et Documents working paper no.l. Montréal: INRS-Urbanisation.
20. Forstall, R., and R. Greene. 1997. Defining job concentrations: The Los Angeles case. Urban Geography 18:705-39.
21. Fotheringham, A., C. Brunsdon, and M. Charlton. 2000. Quantitative geography. London: Sage.
22. Freestone, R., and P. Murphy. 1998. Metropolitan restructuring and suburban employment centres: Cross-cultural perspectives on the Australian experience. Journal of the American Planning Association 64 (3): 286-96.
23. Garreau, J. 1991. Edge city. New York: Doubleday.
24. Germain, A., and M. Polèse. 1995. The socio-residential structure of Puebla, Mexico: An essay of urban ecology. Essai d’écologie urbaine. Cahiers de Géographie du Québec 107:309-33.
25. Germain, A., and D. Rose. 2000. Montréal: The quest for a metropolis. London: John Wiley and Sons.
26. Gordon, P., and H. Richardson. 1996a. Beyond poly-centricity: The dispersed metropolis, Los Angeles, 1970-1990. Journal of the American Planning Association 62:289-95.
27. Gordon, P., and H. Richardson. 1996b. Employment decentralization in U.S. metropolitan areas: Is Los Angeles an outlier or the norm? Environment and Planning A 28:1727-13.
28. Gottdiener, M. 1994. The social production of urban space. 2nd ed. Austin: University of Texas Press.
29. Gregory, D. 1994. Social theory and human geography. In Human geography: Society, space, and social science, ed. D. Gregory, R. Martin, and G. Smidi, 78-112. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
30. Harris, C. 1997. “The nature of cities” and urban geography in the last half century. Urban Geography 18:15-35.
31. Harris, C., and E. Ullman. 1945. The nature of cities. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 242:7-17. Reprinted 1970, A geography of urban places, ed. R. Putnam, F. Taylor, and P. Kettle, 91-101. London: Methuen.
32. Harvey, D. 1973. Social justice and the city. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Press.
33. Hise, G. 2001. Industry and the landscapes of social reform. hi From Chicago to L.A., ed. M. Dear, 95-130. Thousand Oaks, CA Sage.
34. Hoyt, H. 1939. The structure and growth of residential neighborhoods in American cities. Washington, DC: Federal Housing Administration.
35. Huet, A. 2000. The Chicago School: A Scientific adventure to be rediscovered. Espaces et Sociétés 103: 57-84.
36. Ingram, G. 1998. Patterns of metropolitan development: What have we learned? Urban Studies 35 (7): 1019-35.
37. Krugman, P. 1995. Development, geography, and economic theory. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
38. Langlois, A., and P. Kitchen. 2001. Identifying and measuring dimensions of urban deprivation in Montreal: An analysis of the 1996 census data. Urban Studies 38:119-39.
39. Le Bourdais, C., and M. Beaudry. 1981. The changing residential structure of Montréal. The Canadian Geographer 32 (2): 98-113.
40. Lewis, R. 2000. Manufacturing Montreal: The making of an industrial landscape. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
41. Lynch, K. (1981) 1994. Good city form. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
42. Manson, S. 2001. Simplifying complexity: A review of complexity theory. Geoforum 32:405-14.
43. Markusen, A. 1999. Fuzzy concepts, scanty evidence, policy distance: The case for rigor and policy relevance in critical regional studies. Regional Studies 33 (9): 869-84.
44. Marshall, A 1890. Principles of economics: An introductory volume. London: Macmillan and Co.
45. Massey, D. (1984) 1995. Spatial divisions of labor: Social structures and the geography of production. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge.
46. Park, R., E. Burgess, and R. McKenzie, eds. 1925. The city. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
47. Philo, C., R. Mitchell, and A. More. 1998. Reconsidering quantitative geography. Environment and Planning A 30:191-201.
48. Porter, M. 1990. Competitive advantage of nations. New York: Free Press.
49. Prigogine, I., and I. Stengers. 1979. La nmvelle alliance. Paris: Folio.
50. SAS. 1990. SAS/STAT User’s Guide. Vol. 1.Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
51. Scott, A 2001. Industrial urbanism in late twentieth-century southern California, hi From Chicago to L.A., ed. M. Dear, 161-79. Thousand Oaks, CA Sage.
52. Shearmur, J. 1996. The political thought of Karl Popper. London: Routledge.
53. Shearmur, R., and W. Coffey. 2002a. A tale of four cities: Intrametropolitan employment distribution in Toronto, Montreal, Ottawa, and Vancouver. Environment and Planning A 34:575-98.
54. Shearmur, R., and W. Coffey. 2002b. Urban employment subcentres and sectoral clustering in Montreal: Complementary approaches to the study of urban form. Urban Geography 23 (2): 103-30.
55. Sivitanidou, R. 1999. Profiles of office-commercial values within polycentric Los Angeles: Do service center characteristics matter? Paper presented at the meetings of the North American Regional Science Association, Montreal, November.
56. Soja, E. 2000. Taking Los Angeles apart: Towards a postmodern geography. In The city reader, ed. R. Le Gates and F. Stout, 180-192. 2nd ed. New York: Roudedge.
57. Stanback, T. 1991. The new suburbanization. Boulder: Westview Press.
58. Tuan, Y. 1976. Humanist geography. Armais of the Association of American Geographers 66 (2): 266-76.
59. Urban Geography. 2001. Special issue: Urban geography in the 1960s. 22 (6).
60. Wheeler, J. 2001a. Introduction to special issue: Urban geography in the 1960s. Urban Geography 22 (6): 511-13.
61. Wheeler, J. 2001 b. Assessing the role of spatial analysis in urban geography in the 1960s. Urban Geography 22 (6): 549-58.
62. Yeates, M. 1998. The North American city. 5th ed. New York: HarperCollins.
63. Yeates, M. 2001. Yesterday as tomorrow’s song: The contribution of the 1960s “Chicago School” to urban geography. Urban Geography 22 (6): 514-29.