Motion estimation of transparent objects in the frequency domain

Signal Processing

Volumn 84, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 709-719

  Pingault, M ^a   Pellerin, D ^a,b  

^a GRENOBLE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (France)

^b UNIV GRENOBLE ALPES   (France)

Author keywords

Frequency domain; Motion transparency; SEM algorithm; Statistical model; Velocity estimation

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; FREQUENCY DOMAIN ANALYSIS; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; STOCHASTIC CONTROL SYSTEMS;

FREQUENCY DOMAIN; MOTION TRANSPARENCY; SEM ALGORITHMS; STATISTICAL MODELS; VELOCITY ESTIMATION;

MOTION ESTIMATION;

EID: 1442283125     PISSN: 01651684     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.sigpro.2003.12.008     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Atick J., Redlich A. What does the retina know about natural scenes? Neural Comput. 4(2):1992;196-210.
2. Barron J., Fleet D., Beauchemin S. Performance of optical flow techniques. Internat. J. Comput. Vision. 12(1):1994;43-77.
3. Chéhikian A. Algorithmes optimaux pour la génération de pyramides d'images passe-bas et laplaciennes. Traitement Signal. 9(4):1992;297-307.
4. Chen W.-G., Giannakis G., Nandhakumar N. A harmonic retrieval framework for discontinuous motion estimation. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 7(9):1998;1242-1257.
5. Cord M., Declercq M. Three-dimensional building detection and modeling using a statistical approach. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 10(5):2001;715-723.
6. T. Darrell, E. Simoncelli, Nulling filters and the separation of transparent motions, in: IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition CVPR'93, New York, NY, USA, 1993, pp. 738-739.
7. Dong D., Atick J. Statistics of natural time-varying images. Network Comput. Neural Systems. 6(3):1995;345-358.
8. Fleet D., Jepson A. Computation of component image velocity from local phase information. Internat. J. Comput. Vision. 5(1):1990;77-104.
9. Holland P., Welsch R. Robust regression using iteratively reweighted least-squares. Comm. Statistic-Theory Method A. 6(9):1977;813-827.
10. Horn B., Schunk B. Determining optical flow. Artificial Intell. 17(1-3):1981;185-203.
11. A. Jepson, M. Black, Mixture models for optical flow computation, in: IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition CVPR'93, New York, NY, USA, 1993, pp. 760-761.
12. Milanfar P. Projection-based, frequency-domain estimation of superimposed translational motions. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A. 13(11):1996;2151-2162.
13. Mulligan J. Motion transparency is restricted to two planes. Investigation Ophthalmol. Visual Sci. 33(suppl.):1992;1049.
14. M. Shizawa, K. Mase, A unified computational theory for motion transparency and motion boundaries based on eigenenergy analysis, in: IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition CVPR'91, Lahaina, Maui, HI, USA, 1991, pp. 289-295.
15. Shizawa M., Mase K. Multiple optical flow fundamental constraint equations and a unified computation theory for detecting motion transparency and motion boundaries. Systems and Computers. 25(5):1994;52-74.
16. Spinéi A., Pellerin D. Motion estimation of opaque or transparent objects using triads of gabor filters. Signal Processing. 81(4):2001;845-853.
17. D. Vernon, Decoupling Fourier components of dynamic image sequences: a theory of signal separation, image segmentation and optical flow estimation, in: Fifth European Conference on Computer Vision ECCV'98, Freiburg, Allemagne, 1998, pp. 68-85.
18. Yu W., Sommer G., Daniilidis K. Three dimensional orientation signatures with conic kernel filtering for multiple motion analysis. Image Vision Computing. 21(5):2003;447-458.