Extreme Ectasia of the Femoral Diaphysis Secondary to Loosening of a Long Wagner Stem: A Case Report

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery

Volumn 86, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 590-594

  Kalhor, Morteza ^a   Nötzli, Hubert P ^b   Stover, Michael D ^c   Ganz, Reinhold ^d  

^a IRAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^c LOYOLA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTHROPLASTY; ARTICLE; CASE REPORT; CLINICAL FEATURE; DIAPHYSIS; DISEASE COURSE; FEMALE; FEMUR; FEMUR ECTASIA; FEMUR MALFORMATION; FRACTURE FIXATION; HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS;

EID: 1442282591     PISSN: 00219355     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200403000-00020     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Grauer JD, Amstutz HC, O'Carroll PF, Dorey FJ. Resection arthroplasty of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1989;71:669-78.
2. Harris WH, White RE Jr. Resection arthroplasty for nonseptic failure of total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 1982;171:62-7.
3. Head WC, Mallnin TI, Mallory TH, Emerson RH Jr. Onlay cortical allografting for the femur. Orthop Clin North Am. 1998;29:307-12.
4. Head WC, Wagner RA, Emerson RH Jr, Malinin TI. Restoration of femoral bone stock in revision total hip arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am. 1993;24:697-703.
5. Argenson JN, Gravler R. [Femoral revision with impacted massive or morselized graft]. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2000;86(Suppl 1):46-7. French.
6. Elting JJ, Mikhan WE, Zicat BA, Hubbell JC, Lane LE, House B. Preliminary report of impaction grafting for exchange femoral arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 1995;319:159-67.
7. Gie GA, Linder L, Ling RS, Simon JP, Slooff TJ, Timperley AJ. Impacted cancellous allografts and cement for revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1993;75:14-21.
8. van Biezen FC, ten Have BL, Verhaar JA. Impaction bone-grafting of severely defective femora in revision total hip surgery: 21 hips followed for 41-85 months. Acta Orthop Scand. 2000;71:135-42.
9. Charrols O, Kerboull L, Vastel L, Courpied JP, Kerboull M. [Femoral reconstruction with massive allograft implanted in a split femur. Mid-term results of 18 reconstructions]. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2000;86:801-8. French.
10. Gross AE, Hutchison CR, Alexeeff M, Mahomed N, Leitch K, Morsi E. Proximal femoral allografts for reconstruction of bone stock in revision arthroplasty of the hip. Clin Orthop. 1995;319:151-8.
11. Haddad FS, Spangehl MJ, Masri BA, Garbuz DS, Duncan CP. Circumferential allograft replacement of the proximal femur. A critical analysis. Clin Orthop. 2000;371:98-107.
12. Roberson JR. Proximal femoral bone loss after total hip arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am. 1992;23:291-302.
13. Zmolek JC, Dorr LD. Revision total hip arthroplasty. The use of solid allograft. J Arthroplasty. 1993;8:361-70.
14. Barger WL. Shape the implant to the patient. A rationale for the use of custom-fit cementless total hip implants. Clin Orthop. 1989;249:73-8.
15. Malkani AL, Sim FH, Chao EY. Custom-made segmental femoral replacement prosthesis in revision total hip arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am. 1993;24:727-33.
16. Sim FH, Chao EY. Hip salvage by proximal femoral replacement. J Bone Joint, Surg Am. 1981;63:1228-39.
17. D'Antonio J, McCarthy JC, Bargar WL, Borden LS, Cappelo WN, Collis DK, Steinberg ME, Wedge JH. Classification of femoral abnormalities in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 1993;296:133-9.
18. Archibeck MJ, Jacobs JJ, Roebuck KA, Glant TT. The basic science of periprosthetic osteolysis. Instr Course Lect. 2001;50:185-95.
19. Aspenberg P, Herbertsson P. Periprosthetic bone resorption. Particles versus movement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1996;78:641-6.
20. Aspenberg P, Van der Vis H. Migration, particles, and fluid pressure. A discussion of causes of prosthetic loosening. Clin Orthop. 1998;352:75-80.
21. Gruen TA, McNeice GM, Amstutz HC. "Modes of failure" of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening. Clin Orthop. 1979;141:17-27.
22. Howle DW, Vernon-Roberts B, Oakeshott R, Manthey B. A rat model of resorption of bone at the cement-bone interface in the presence of polyethylene wear particles. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1988;70:257-63.
23. Van der Vis HM, Aspenberg P, Marti RK, Tigchelaar W, Van Noorden CJ. Fluid pressure causes bone resorption in a rabbit model of prosthetic loosening, Clin Orthop. 1998;350:201-8.
24. Gross AE, Hutchison CR. Proximal femoral allografts for reconstruction of bone stock in revision arthroplasty of the hip. Orthop Clin North Am. 1998;29:313-7.
25. Haddad FS, Garbuz DS, Masri BA, Duncan CP, Hutchison CR, Gross AE. Femoral bone loss in patients managed with revision hip replacement: results of circumferential allograft replacement. Instr Course Lect. 2000;49:147-62.
26. Bohm P, Bischel O. Femoral revision with the Wagner SL revision stem: evaluation of one hundred and twenty-nine revisions followed for a mean of 4.8 years. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83:1023-31.
27. Isacson J, Stark A, Wallensten R. The Wagner revision prosthesis consistently restores femoral bone structure. Int Orthop. 2000;24:139-42.
28. Kolstad K, Adalberth G, Mailmin H, Milbrink J, Sahistedt B. The Wagner revision stem for severe osteolysis. 31 hips followed for 1.5-5 years. Acta Orthop Scand. 1996;67:541-4.
29. Wagner H. [Revision prosthesis for the hip joint in severe bone lossi. Orthopade. 1987;16:295-300. German.