The Combination of Acoustic Rhinometry, Rhinoresistometry and Flow Simulation in Noses before and after Turbinate Surgery: A Model Study

ORL

Volumn 65, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 341-347

  Grutzenmacher S ^a,b   Lang, C ^a   Mlynski, G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GREIFSWALD   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY MEDICINE GREIFSWALD   (Germany)

Author keywords

Acoustic rhinometry; Nasal airflow; Rhinoresistometry; Turbinate surgery

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; NORMAL HUMAN; NOSE AIRFLOW; NOSE AIRWAY RESISTANCE; NOSE CAVITY; NOSE SURGERY; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RHINOMETRY; RHINORESISTOMETRY;

AIRWAY RESISTANCE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EDUCATION, MEDICAL; HUMANS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; NASAL CAVITY; NASAL MUCOSA; PULMONARY VENTILATION; RHINOMANOMETRY; RHINOMETRY, ACOUSTIC; TURBINATES;

EID: 1442278938     PISSN: 03011569     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000076052     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Clement WA, White PS: Trends in turbinate surgery literature: A 35-year review. Clin Otolaryngol 2001;26:124-128.
2. Hol MK, Huizing EH: Treatment of inferior turbinate pathology: A review and critical evaluation of the different techniques. Rhinology 2000;38:157-166.
3. Giacchi RJ, Lebowitz RA, Jacobs JB: Middle turbinate resection: Issues and controversies. Am J Rhinol 2000;14:193-197.
4. Mlynski G, Loew H: Die Rhinoresistometrie: Eine Weiterentwicklung der Rhinomanometrie. Laryngorhinootologie 1993;72:608-610.
5. Hilberg O, Jackson AC, Swift DL, Pedersen OF: Acoustic rhinometry: Evaluation of nasal cavity geometry by acoustic reflection. J Appl Physiol 1989;66:295-303.
6. Lenders H, Pirsig W: Diagnostic and value of acoustic rhinometry: Patients with allergic and vasomotoric rhinitis compared with normal controls. Rhinology 1990;28:5-16.
7. Lenders HG: Akustische Rhinometrie: Eine Analyse der Messmethode und ihrer klinischen Anwendung; Habilitation, Ulm, 1992.
8. Mlynski G, Grützenmacher S, Plontke S, Grützmacher W, Mlynski B, Lang C: A method for studying nasal air flow by means of fluid dynamics experiments. Z Med Phys 2000;10:207-214.
9. Mlynski G, Grützenmacher S, Mlynski B, Koch B: Modelluntersuchungen zur Nasenmuschelchirurgie. Laryngorhinootologie 1993;72:614-617.
10. Pinkpank A: Die Relation zwischen eigener Beurteilung der Nasenatmung zur Rhinoskopie und Rhinomanometrie. HNO 1986;34:194-197.
11. Lane AP, Zweimann B, Lanza DC, Swift D, Doty R, Dhong HJ, Kennedy DW: Acoustic rhinometry in the evaluation of nasal obstruction. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1996;105:811-818.
12. Naito K, Miyata S, Saito S, Sakurai K, Takeuchi K: Comparison of perceptional nasal obstruction with rhinomanometric and acoustic rhinometric assessment. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2001;258:505-508.
13. Talmon Y, Samet A, Gilbey P: Total inferior turbinectomy: Operative results and technique. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2000;109:1117-1119.
14. Fradis M, Golz A, Danino J, Gershinski M, Goldsher M, Gaitini L, Malatskey S, Armush W: Inferior turbinectomy versus submucosal diathermy for inferior turbinate hypertrophy. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2000;109:1040-1045.
15. Cole P: Nasal and oral airflow resistors: Site, function and assessment. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1992;118:790-793.
16. Haight JSJ, Cole P: The site and function of the nasal valve. Laryngoscope 1983;93:49-55.