Electronic g-tensors of semiquinones in photosynthetic reaction centers. A density functional study

Journal of Physical Chemistry B

Volumn 108, Issue 7, 2004, Pages 2464-2469

  Kacprzak, Sylwia ^a   Kaupp, Martin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WÜRZBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPOSITION EFFECTS; CRYSTALLOGRAPHY; ELECTRON SPIN RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; HYDROGEN BONDS; MOLECULAR STRUCTURE; NEGATIVE IONS; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; POLARIZATION; PROBABILITY DENSITY FUNCTION; QUANTUM THEORY;

ELECTRONIC TENSORS; PROPANOL; SEMIQUINONES; SPIN POLARIZATION EFFECTS; SUPERMOLECULAR MODELS; TRYPTOPHAN;

PROTEINS;

EID: 1442263786     PISSN: 15206106     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/jp036322h     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Blankenship, R. E. Molecular Mechanisms of Photosynthesis; Blackwell Science: Oxford, UK, 2002.
2. Möbius, K. Biological Magnetic Resonance; Berliner, L. J., Reuben, J., Eds.; Plenum Press: New York, 1993; Vol. 13, pp 253-274.
3. Prisner, T. F. Advances in Magnetic and Optical Resonance; Warren, W., Ed.; Academic Press: New York, 1997; Vol. 20, pp 245-299 and references therein.
4. (a) Lubitz, W.; Feher, G. Appl. Magn. Reson. 1999, 17, 1.
5. (b) Levanon, H.; Möbius, K. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 1997, 26, 495.
6. Burghaus, O.; Plato, M.; Rohrer, M.; Möbius, K.; MacMillian, F.; Lubitz, W. J. Phys. Chem. 1993, 97, 7639.
7. Rohrer, M.; Plato, M.; MacMillan, F.; Grishin, Y.; Lubitz, W.; Möbius, K. J. Magn. Reson. 1995, 116, 59.
8. Zech, S. G.; Hofbauer, W.; Kamlowski, A.; Fromme, P.; Stehlik, D.; Lubitz, W.; Bittl, R. J. Phys. Chem. B 2000, 104, 9728.
9. Van Der Est, A.; Prisner, T. F.; Bittl, R.; Fromme, P.; Lubitz, W.; Möbius, K.; Stehlik, D. J. Phys. Chem. B 1997, 101, 1437.
10. MacMillan, F.; Hanley, J.; Van Der Weerd, L. J.; Knüpling, M.; Un, S.; Rutherford, A. W. Biochemistry 1997, 36, 9297.
11. Isaacson, R. A.; Lendzian, F.; Abresch, E. C.; Lubitz, W.; Feher, G. Biophys. J. 1995, 69, 311.
12. Kaupp, M. Biochemistry 2002, 41, 2895.
13. Knüpling, M.; Törring, J. T.; Un, S. Chem. Phys. 1996, 219, 291.
14. Törring, J. T.; Un, S.; Knüpling, M.; Plato, M.; Möbius, K. J. Chem. Phys. 1997, 107, 3905.
15. Kaupp, M.; Remenyi, C.; Vaara, J.; Malkina, O. L.; Malkin, V. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 2709.
16. Teutloff, C.; Hofbauer, W.; Zech, S. G.; Stein, M.; Bittl, R.; Lubitz, W. Appl. Magn. Reson. 2001, 21, 363.
17. Neyman, K. M.; Ganyushin, D. I.; Rinkevičius, Ž.; Rösch, N. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 2002, 90, 1404.
18. Engström, M.; Vahtras, O.; Ågren, H. Chem. Phys. 1999, 243, 263.
19. Malkina, O. L.; Vaara, J.; Schimmelpfennig, B.; Munzarova, M.; Malkin, V. G.; Kaupp, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 9206.
20. Sieckmann, I.; Van Der Est, A.; Bottin, H.; Sétif, P.; Stehlik, D. FEBS Lett. 1991, 98, 284.
21. Van Der Est, A.; Sieckmann, I.; Lubitz, W.; Stehlik, D. Chem. Phys. 1995, 349, 194.
22. Stowell, M. H.; McPhillips, T. M.; Rees, D. C.; Soltis, S. M.; Abresch, E.; Feher, G. Science 1997, 276, 812.
23. Jordan, P.; Fromme, P.; Witt, H. T.; Klukas, O.; Saenger, W.; Krauss, N. Nature 2001, 411, 909.
24. See results quoted in ref 3a.
25. Deligiannakis, Y.; Rutherford, A. W. BBA-Bioenerget. 2001, 1507, 226.
26. Xu, W.; Chitnis, P. R.; Valieva, A.; Van Der Est, A.; Pushkar, Y. N.; Krystyniak, M.; Teutloff, C.; Zech, S. G.; Bittl, R.; Stehlik, D.; Zybailov, B.; Shen, G.; Golbeck, J. H. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 27864.
27. Xu, W.; Chitnis, P. R.; Valieva, A.; Van Der Est, A.; Brettel, K.; Guergova-Kuras, M.; Pushkar, Y. N.; Zech, S. G.; Stehlik, D.; Shen, G.; Zybailov, B.; Golbeck, J. H. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 27876.
28. Becke, A. D. Phys. Rev. A 1988, 38, 3098.
29. Perdew, J. P. Phys. Rev. B 1986, 33, 8822.
30. Frisch, M. J.; Trucks, G. W.; Schlegel, H. B.; Scuseria, G. E.; Robb, M. A.; Cheeseman, J. R.; Zakrzewski, V. G.; Montgomery, J. A., Jr.; Stratmann, R. E.; Burant, J. C.; Dapprich, S.; Millam, J. M.; Daniels, A. D.; Kudin, K. N.; Strain, M. C.; Farkas, O.; Tomasi, J.; Barone, V.; Cossi, M.; Cammi, R.; Mennucci, B.; Pomelli, C.; Adamo, C.; Clifford, S.; Ochterski, J.; Petersson, G. A.; Ayala, P. Y.; Cui, Q.; Morokuma, K.; Malick, D. K.; Rabuck, A. D.; Raghavachari, K.; Foresman, J. B.; Cioslowski, J.; Ortiz, J. V.; Baboul, A. G.; Stefanov, B. B.; Liu, G.; Liashenko, A.; Piskorz, P.; Komaromi, I.; Gomperts, R.; Martin, R. L.; Fox, D. J.; Keith, T.; Al-Laham, M. A.; Peng, C. Y.; Nanayakkara, A.; Gonzalez, C.; Challacombe, M.; Gill, P. M. W.; Johnson, B.; Chen, W.; Wong, M. W.; Andres, J. L.; Gonzalez, C.; Head-Gordon, M.; Replogle, E. S.; Pople, J. A. Gaussian 98, Revisions A.7 and A.9; Gaussian, Inc.: Pittsburgh, PA, 1998.
31. Bergner, A.; Dolg, M.; Küchle, W.; Stoll, H.; Preuss, H. Mol. Phys. 1993, 80 1431.
32. d-Functions were taken from: Gaussian Basis Sets for Molecular Calculations; Huzinaga, S., Ed.; Elsevier: New York, 1984.
33. Godbout, N.; Salahub, D. R.; Andzelm, J.; Wimmer, E. Can. J. Chem. 1992, 70, 560.
34. •- and the SIG fragment provided somewhat different hydrogen bond lengths: 2.26 (Ser L223), 2.03 (Ile L224), and 2.47 Å (Gly L225). However, computed g-tensor components for this structure differed by less than 20 ppm.
35. Salahub, D. R.; Fournier, R.; Mlynarski, P.; Papai, I.; St-Amant, A.; Ushio, J. Density Functional Methods in Chemistry; Labanowski, J., Andzelm, J., Eds.; Springer, New York, 1991.
36. Hess, B. A.; Marian, C. M.; Wahlgren, U.; Gropen, O. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1996, 251, 365.
37. Schimmelpfennig, B. 1996 Atomic Spin-Orbit Mean-Field Integral Program, Stockholms Universitet, Stockholm, Sweden.
38. Kaupp, M.; Reviakine, R.; Malkina, O. L.; Arbuznikov, A.; Schimmelpfennig, B.; Malkin, V. G. J. Comput. Chem. 2002, 23, 794.
39. Ciofini, I.; Reviakine, R.; Arbuznikov, A.; Kaupp, M. Theor. Chem. Acc. In press.
40. J. Asher, N. Doltsinis, D. Marx, and M. Kaupp, unpublished results.
41. Similar results have also been obtained for most other main group radicals (see refs 15 and 31), and also in uncoupled DFT calculations of NMR chemical shifts for main group systems with multiple bonds (cf.: Bühl, M.; Kaupp, M.; Malkin, V. G.; Malkina, O. L. J. Comput. Chem. 1999, 20, 91, and references therein). The overestimate of the most "paramagnetic" component of the tensors by uncoupled DFT calculations appears in all cases to be related to the fact that these large components tend to be dominated by one specific low-energy excitation in the second-order perturbation expression. As the corresponding energy denominator is underestimated by gradient-corrected functionals, the observed overestimation of the tensor component arises. As the "smaller" components are not so much dependent on one excitation but feature contributions from several couplings with larger energy denominators, they tend to be less sensitive to these deficiencies of the currently available functionals.
42. Nonella, M. Photosynth. Res. 1998, 55, 253.
43. O'Malley, P. J. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1999, 1411, 101.
44. Rigby, S. E. J.; Evans, M. C. W.; Heathcote, P. Biochemistry 1996, 35, 6651.
45. O'Malley, P. J. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1998, 285, 99.
46. Kamlowski, A.; Altenberg-Greulich, B.; van der Est, A.; Zech, S. G.; Bittl, R.; Fromme, P.; Lubitz, W.; Stehlik, D. J. Phys. Chem. B 1998, 102, 8278.