A comprehensive evaluation of the environmental external costs of a fusion power plant

Fusion Engineering and Design

Volumn 56-57, Issue , 2001, Pages 95-103

  Hamacher, T ^c   Saez R M ^a   Aquilonius, K ^b   Cabal, H ^a   Hallberg, B ^b   Korhonen, R ^d   Lechon Y ^a   Lepicard, S ^g   Schleisner, L ^e   Schneider, T ^g   Ward, D ^f  

^a CIEMAT   (Spain)

^b STUDSVIK NUCLEAR AB   (Sweden)

^c MAX PLANCK INSTITUT FÜR PLASMAPHYSIK   (Germany)

^d VTT TECHNICAL RESEARCH CENTRE OF FINLAND   (Finland)

^e TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF DENMARK   (Denmark)

^f CULHAM SCIENCE CENTRE   (United Kingdom)

^g CEPN   (France)

Author keywords

Environmental external costs; ExternE methodology; Fusion power plant

Indexed keywords

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; FUSION REACTORS; PARTICULATE EMISSIONS; RADIOACTIVE WASTES;

FUSION POWER PLANTS;

NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS;

EID: 14344272921     PISSN: 09203796     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0920-3796(01)00240-X     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. A.C. Pigou, Wealth and Welfare, 1912.
2. ExternE, Externalities of Energy, Summary, Vol. 1, Luxembourg, European Commission, 1995.
3. Externalities studies: why are the numbers different?, Proceeding of the International Conference: Social Cost and Sustainability, May 1995, Heidelberg, 1996.
4. L. Schleisner, Differences in methodologies used for externality assessment, why are the numbers different, Riso National Laboratory, Roskilde, Riso-R-1126(EN), June 1999.
5. J. Raeder et al., Safety and environmental assessment of fusion power (SEAFP), European Commission DG XII, Brussels, EURFUBRU XII-217/95, 1995.
6. D.J. Ward, R.A. Forrest, Updating of technical inputs on conceptual fusion power plants, SERF2/UKAEA/1.1.1, Internal report, May 2000.
7. Interim design report-section VII:ITER Project Cost Estimate, 1995.
8. K. Schwaiger et al., Energetische Untersuchung eines Kernkraftwerkes, München, 1996.
9. L. Schleisner, Socio-economic research on fusion, SERF: 1997-98. Macro Task E2: External Costs and Benefits. Sub Task: Life Cycle assessment of a fusion power plant. Report R2.1 RISØ National Laboratory, 1998.
10. R. Suez et al., Final Report of SERF 2 External Cost macro task, Ciemat, Madrid, 2001.
11. B. Hallberg et al., Socio-economic research on fusion, SERF: 1997-98. Macro TaskE2: External Costs and Benefits. Sub Task: Evaluation of External Impacts of a Fusion Power Plant. Decommissioning and Site Restoration, Report R2.1, Studsvik ECO & Safety AB, Sweden, 1998.
12. R. Korhonen, Evaluation of external impacts of fusion power plant. Long term disposal of fusion waste, Internal Report, June 2000.
13. T. Hamacher et al., Impacts of an intense fusion economy, SOFT Madrid 2000, Proceedings of the 21st Symposium on Fusion Technology Madrid 2000, to be published in Fusion Engineering and Design.
14. T. Schneider et al., Evalaution of radiological and economic consequences associated with an accident of a fusion power plant, SOFT Madrid 2000, Proceedings of the 21st Symposium on Fusion Technology Madrid 2000, to be published in Fusion Engineering and Design.
15. Y. Lechón, Exploitation and improvements of the external costs assessment of fusion power, SOFT Madrid 2000, Proceedings of the 21st Symposium on Fusion Technology Madrid 2000, to be published in Fusion Engineering and Design.
16. R. Suez et al., Socio-economic research on fusion SERF 1997-1998, Macro Task E2. External costs and benefits. Final Report, Madrid 1999.
17. K. Aquilouivs, Sensitivity and uncertainty analysis in external cost assessments of fusion power, SOFT Madrid 2000, Proceesings of the 21st Sympossium of Fusion Technology Madrid, 2000 to be published in Fusion Engineering and Design.
18. P. Lako et al., The long-term potential of fusion power in Western Europe, ECN-C-98-071, 1998.
19. A. Rabl et al., Environmental damages and costs: an analysis of uncertainties, ExternE Core Project: Maintenance, 1997.