What do reflections tell us about the shape of a mirror?

Proceedings - 1st Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization, APGV 2004

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 115-118

  Savarese, Silvio ^a   Fei Fei, Li ^a   Perona, Pietro ^a  

^a CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Mirror surfaces; Shape from texture; Shape perception; Specular reflections

Indexed keywords

MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MIRRORS; OBJECT RECOGNITION; PATTERN MATCHING; SURFACES; TEXTURES; THREE DIMENSIONAL COMPUTER GRAPHICS;

MIRROR SURFACES; SHAPE FROM TEXTURE; SHAPE PERCEPTION; SPECULAR REFLECTIONS;

LIGHT REFLECTION;

EID: 14344259770     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1012551.1012571     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. BECK, J., AND PRAZDNY, S. 1981. Highlights and the perception of glossiness. In Perception and Psychoph., vol. 30, 407-410.
2. BLAKE, A., AND BRELSTAFF, G. 1988. Geometry from specularities, In Proc. of Int Conf. of Computer Vision, 394-403.
3. BLAKE, A., AND BÜLTHOFF, H. 1990. Does the brain know the physics of specular reflection? In Nature, vol. 343, 165-168.
4. BLAKE, A., BÜLTHOFF, H., AND SHEINBERG, D. 1993. Shape from texture: ideal observers and human psychophysics. In Vision Research, vol. 33, 1723-37.
5. FLEMING, R., TORRALBA, A., AND ADELSON, E. H. 2003. How image statistics drive shape-from-texture and shape-from-specularities. In Proc. of Third Annual Meeting of the VSS - http://joumalofvision.org.
6. FLEMING, R. W., DROR, R. O., AND ADELSON, E. H. 2003. How do humans determine reflectance properties under unknown illumination? In Journal of Vision, vol. 3, 347-368.
7. KIM, S., HAGH-SHENAS, H., AND INTERRANTE, V. 2004. Conveying shape with texture: experimental investigations of texture's effects on shape categorization judgments. In IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.
8. KNILL, D. 1998. Surface orientation from texture: Ideal observers, generic observers and the information content of texture cues. In Vision Research, vol. 38, 1655-1682.
9. KOENDERINK, J., AND DOORN, A. V. 1980. Photometric invariants related to solid shape. In Acta Optica, vol. 27, 981-996.
10. Lu, R., KOENDERINK, J., AND KAPPERS, A. M. 1999. Surface roughness from highlight structure. In Applied Optics, vol. 38, 2886-2894.
11. MALIK, J., AND ROSENHOLTZ, R. 1997. Surface orientation from texture: Isotropy or homogeneity (or both?). In Vision Research, vol. 37, 2283-2293.
12. NAYAR, S., AND OREN, M. 1995. Visual appearance of matte surfaces. In Science, vol. 267, 1153-1156.
13. OREN, M., AND NAYAR, S. 1997. A theory of specular surface geometry. In Trans. Int. Journal of Computer Vision, 105-124.
14. SAVARESE, S., FEI-FEI, L., AND PERONA, P. 2003. Can we see the shape of a mirror? In Proc. of 3rd Annual Meeting of VSS http://joumalofvision.org.
15. SAVARESE, S., CHEN, M., AND PERONA, P. 2004. Recovering local shape of a mirror surface from reflection of a regular grid. In Proc. of European Conference of Computer Vision.
16. TODD, J. T., AND AKERSTROM, R. A. 1987. Perception of three-dimensional form from patterns of optical texture. In Perception and Psychophysics, vol. 13, 242-255.
17. TODD, J. T., NORMAN, J. F., AND KOENDERINK, J. 1997. Effects of texture, illumination, and surface reflectance on stereoscopic shape perception. In Perception, vol. 26, 807-822.
18. ZAIDI, Q., AND LI, A. 2002. Limitations on shape information provided by texture cues. In Vision Research, vol. 47, 815-835.
19. ZISSERMAN, A., GIBLIN, P., AND BLAKE, A. 1989. The information available to a moving observer from specialities. In Image and Video Computing, vol. 7, 38-42.