Cambial isoperoxidases related to graft compatibility in pear-quince graft combinations

Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 83-89

  Gülen, Hatice ^a   Çelik, Menşure ^b   Polat, Mehmet ^b   Ȩris, Atilla ^a  

^a ULUDAG UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b ANKARA UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Grafting; Incompatibility; Pear (Pyrus communis); Peroxidase; Quince (Cydonia oblanga)

Indexed keywords

BIOCOMPATIBILITY; BIOMARKERS; ELECTROPHORESIS; ENZYMES; ORGANIC POLYMERS; PLANTS (BOTANY); VISUALIZATION;

CLONES; CULTIVARS; GRAFT COMPATIBILITY; ISOPEROXIDASE MARKERS;

GRAFTS;

HORTICULTURE; INCOMPATIBILITY;

CYDONIA; CYDONIA OBLONGA; PYRUS COMMUNIS;

EID: 14344256944     PISSN: 1300011X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3906/tar-0404-15     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Andrews, P.K. and C.S. Marquez. 1993. Graft incompatibility. In: Hort. Reviews. Vol. 15 (Ed. J. Janick), pp. 183-231.
2. Buchloh, G. 1960. The lignification in stock-scion junctions and its relation to compatibility. In: Phenolics in Plant in Health and Disease. (Ed. J.B. Pidham).Pergamon Press, Long Island, N.Y.
3. Çelik, M. 1982. Bazi Armut Çeşitleri lçin En Uygun S.Ö. Ayva Anaci Seçimi Ve Aşi Uyuşmazliǧinin Biyokimyasal Analiz Yöntemleri Ile Belirlenmesi. Ankara Üniv., Zir. Fak., Bahiçe Bit. Böl. Doktora Tezi, p. 94.
4. Çelik, M. 1988. Ankara koşullarinda Williams, Ankara, Akça ve Şeker Armut Çeşitleri Için En Uygun S.Ö. Ayva Anaçlarinin Seçimi Üzerinde Bir Araştirma. A. Ü. Zir. Fak. Yayinlari, No:1078, Ankara.
5. Copes, D.L. 1978. Isozyme activities differ in compatible and incompatible Douglas-fir graft unions. Forest Sci. 24: 297-303.
6. Davis, B.J. 1964. Disc electrophoresis, method and application to human serum proteins. Ann. NY. Acad. Sci. 121: 404-427.
7. Deloire, A. and C. Hebant. 1982. Peroxidase activity and lignification at the interface between stock and scion of compatible and incompatible grafts of Capsicum on Lycopersicum. Ann. Bot. 49: 887-891.
8. Gaspar, T.H., C.L. Penel, T. Thorpe and H. Grappin. 1982. Chemistry and biochemistry of peroxidases. In: Peroxidases (1970-1980), a Survey of Their Biochemical and Physiological Roles in Higher Plants. (Eds.: T.H. Gaspar, C.L. Penel, T. Thorpe and H. Grappin), University of Geneva, pp. 10-60.
9. Gulen, H., R. Arora, A. Kuden, S. L. Krebs and J. Postman. 2002. Peroxidase isozyme profiles in compatible and incompatible pear/quince graft combinations. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 127(2): 152-157.
10. Harkin, J.M. and J.R. Obst. 1973. Lignification in trees: Indication of exclusive peroxidase participation. Science. 180: 296-298.
11. Hartmann, H.T., D.E. Kester, F.T. Davies Jr., and R.L. Geneve. 1997. The biology of grafting. In: Plant Propagation: Principles and Practices. (Eds.: H.T. Hartmann, D.E. Kester, F.T. Davies, Jr. and R.L. Geneve), Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, pp. 392-436.
12. Macheix, J.J., A. Fleuriet and M.P. Quessada. 1986. Involment of phenols and peroxidases in wound healing and grafting. In: Molecular and Physiological Aspects of Plant Peroxidases. (Eds.: H. Grappin, C.L. Penel and T.H. Gaspar), University of Geneva, pp. 267-286.
13. Manganaris, A.G. and F.H. Alston. 1992. Inheritance and linkage relationships of peroxidase isoenzymes in apple. Theor. Appl. Genet. 83: 392-399.
14. Mosse, B. 1962. Graft incompatibility in fruit trees. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, England. p. 36.
15. Pirovana, L., G.A. Sacchi, A. Abruzzese, S. Musacchi, G. Bernardi, S. Sansavini and M. Cocucci. 2000. Study of gene expression in compatible and incompatible pear/pear and pear/quince grafts by mRNA differential display. Abstracts Book, VIII International Symposium on Pear, University of Bologna, Italy, pp. 109-110.
16. Santamour., F.S. Jr. 1980. How to build a better tree. New horizons from the Horticultural Research Institute, pp. 1-3.
17. Santamour., F.S. Jr. 1982. Cambial peroxidase isoenzymes in relation to systematics of Acer. Bul. Torey Bot. Club. 109: 152-161.
18. Santamour, F.S. Jr. 1988a. Graft compatibility in woody plants: an expanded perspective. J. Environ. Hort. 6(1): 27-32.
19. Santamour, F.S. Jr. 1988b. Graft incompatibility related to cambial peroxidase isozymes in Chinese chestnut. J. Environ. Hort. 6(2): 33-39.
20. Santamour, F.S. Jr. 1988c. Cambial peroxidase enzymes related to graft incompatibility in red oak. J. Environ. Hort. 6(3): 87-93.
21. Santamour, F.S. Jr. 1989. Cambial peroxidase enzymes related to graft incompatibility in red mable. J. Environ. Hort. 7: 8-18.
22. Santamour, F.S. Jr., A.J. McArdle, and R.A. Jaynes. 1986. Cambial isoperoxidase patterns in castanea. J. Environ. Hort. 4(1): 14-16.
23. Tukey, H.B. 1978. Dwarfing rootstocks for pear. In: Dwarfed Fruit Trees. (Ed. H.B. Tukey), Cornell University Press, pp. 182-189.
24. Walter, M.H. 1992. Regulation of lignification in defence. In: Plant Gene Research-Genes Involved in Plant Defense. (Eds.: T. Boller and F. Meins), Springer-Verlag, Vienna, pp. 329-352.
25. Wendel, J.F. and N.F. Weeden. 1989. Visualization and interpretation of plant isozymes. In: Isozymes in Plant Biology. (Eds.: D.E. Soltis and P.S. Soltis), Dioscordes Press, Portland, Oregon, pp. 5-44
26. Wolter, K.E. and J.C. Gordon. 1975. Peroxidase as indications of growth and differentiation in aspen callus culture. Physiol. Plant. 33: 219-223.