Program annotation in XML: A parse-tree based approach

Proceedings - Working Conference on Reverse Engineering, WCRE

Volumn 2002-January, Issue , 2002, Pages 190-198

  Power, James F ^a   Malloy, Brian A ^b  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF IRELAND   (Ireland)

^b AMRL   (United States)

Author keywords

Application software; Computer science; Independent component analysis; Information analysis; Java; Program processors; Reverse engineering; Software tools; Visualization; XML

Indexed keywords

APPLICATION PROGRAMS; COMPUTER AIDED SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; COMPUTER SCIENCE; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; FLOW VISUALIZATION; INDEPENDENT COMPONENT ANALYSIS; INFORMATION ANALYSIS; JAVA PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE; PROGRAM COMPILERS; PROGRAM PROCESSORS; REVERSE ENGINEERING; SEMANTICS; SYNTACTICS; XML;

DIFFERENT DOMAINS; JAVA; JAVA PROGRAM; LANGUAGE INDEPENDENTS; PARSE TREES; PARSER GENERATORS; PROGRAM ANNOTATION; SOURCE CODES;

C++ (PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE);

EID: 14344253832     PISSN: 10951350     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/WCRE.2002.1173077     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. A. Aho, R. Sethi, and J. Ullman. Compilers: Principles, Techniques and Tools. Addison-Wesley, 1986.
2. American National Standards Institute. International Standard: Programming Languages-C++. Number 14882:1998(E) in ASC X3. ISO/IEC JTC 1, September 1998.
3. F. Bodin, P. Beckman, D. Gannon, J. Gotwals, S. Narayana, S. Srinivas, and B. Winnicka. Sage++: An object-oriented toolkit and class library for building Fortran and C++ restructuring tools. In The second annual object-oriented numerics conference (OON-SKI), pages 122-136, Sunriver, Oregon, USA, 24-27 April 1994.
4. M. Boshernitsan and S. Graham. Designing an XML-based exchange format for Harmonia. In Seventh Working Conference on Reverse Engineering, pages 287-289, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia, 23-25 November 2000.
5. T. Dean, A. Malton, and R. Holt. Union schemas as a basis for a C++ extractor. In Eighth Working Conference on Reverse Engineering, pages 59-67, Stuttgart, Germany, 2-5 October 2001.
6. H. Deitel, P. Deitel, T. Nieto, and P. Sadhu. XML: How to Program. Prentice Hall, 2001.
7. R. Ferenc and A. Beszédes. Data exchange with the Columbus schema for C++. In 6th European Conference on Software Maintenance and Reengineering, pages 59-66, Budapest, Hungary, 11-13 March 2002.
8. R. Ferenc, S. Sim, R. Holt, R. Koschke, and T. Gymióthy. Towards a standard schema for C/C++. In Eighth Working Conference on Reverse Engineering, pages 49-58, Stuttgart, Germany, 2-5 October 2001.
9. R. Holt and A. Hassan. E/R schema for the Datrix C/C++/Java exchange format. In Seventh Working Conference on Reverse Engineering, pages 284-286, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia, 23-25 November 2000.
10. R. Holt, A. Winter, and A. Schurr. GXL: toward a standard exchange format. In Seventh Working Conference on Reverse Engineering, pages 162-171, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia, 23-25 November 2000.
11. G. Knapen, B. Lague, M. Dagenais, and E. Merlo. Parsing C++ despite missing declarations. In 7th International Workshop on Program Comprehension, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 5-7 May 1999.
12. J. Lilley. PCCTS-based LL(1) C++ parser: Design and theory of operation. http://www.empathy.com/pccts/, Version 1.5 13 July 1997.
13. J. Maletic, M. Collard, and A. Marcus. Source code files as structured documents. In 10th International Workshop on Program Comprehension, La Sorbonne, Paris, France, June 26-29 2002.
14. B. Malloy, S. Linde, E. Duffy, and J. Power. Testing C++ compilers for ISO language conformance. Dr. Dobb's Journal, 337:71-78, June 2002.
15. S. S. Muchnick. Advanced Compiler Design & Implementation. Morgan-Kaufman, 1997.
16. A. Nakhimovsky. Using parser-generators to convert legacy data formats to XML. In XML Europe, Berlin, Germany, 21-25 May 2001.
17. J. Power and B. Malloy. An approach for modeling the name lookup problem in the C++ programming language. In ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, Como, Italy, 19-21 March 2000.
18. S. Reiss and T. Davis. Experiences writing object-oriented compiler front ends. Technical report, Brown University, January 1995.
19. J. Roskind. A YACC-able C++ 2.1 grammar, and the resulting ambiguities. http://www.empathy.com/pccts/roskind.html, Indepen-dent Consultant, Indialantic FL 1989.
20. S. Sim, R. Holt, and S. Easterbrook. On using a benchmark to evaluate C++ extractors. In 10th International Workshop on Program Comprehension, La Sorbonne, Paris, France, 26-29 June 2002.
21. S. Sim and R. Koschke, editors. Workshop on Standard Exchange Format (WoSEF), Limerick, Ireland, 6 June 2000. A workshop of the 22nd International Conference on Software Engineering.
22. H. Sutter. C++ conformance roundup. C/C++ User's Journal, 19(4):3-17, April 2001.
23. World Wide Web Consortium. Extensible markup language (XML). http://www.w3.org/XML/, Revision 1.225 23 April 2002.